Construction of Private Space in An Urban Semioscape: A Case Study in the Sociolinguistics of Globalisation

• Authors: Milan Ferenčík
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Across the world urban semioscapes emerge from multiple and mutually interlocking social activities of the members of sociocultural groups and are established through the deployment of layered configurations of semiotic resources and discourses which index patterns of these activities as well as the underlying norms and values of these groups. A particularly conspicuous semiotic practice which has established itself as a distinct semiotic layer in Slovakia’s urban semioscape is one through which social agents declare certain segments of space as private. By erecting ‘private property’ signs they impose a certain ‘power regime’ on a physical territory but also imprint upon that space a particular ideological meaning. This practice is particularly salient in Slovakia’s geopolitical environment in which the notion of ‘privateness’ was excluded from official ideology under socialism. As language is a principal semiotic mode for the construction of the practice of constructing private space, the practice can also be looked upon as a sociolinguistic phenomenon indexing the post-1989 political and economic transformation processes in Slovakia; that is, the re-establishment of ‘private ownership’ within the larger processes of ‘rectification’ which post-socialist societies underwent in the transformation period. My argument is that the practice is a manifestation of geocultural globalisation on a local scale-level which leads to the emergence of new forms of locality. In the paper I employ Blommaert’s (2010) innovative conceptual toolbox of the sociolinguistics of globalisation’ along with the analytical practices and procedures of geosemiotics and linguistic landscape, and apply them to the corpus of signs which I believe index this practice and establish the topography of private space’ in the urban semioscape examined.

Keywords

EN

construction of private space; geosemiotics; linguistic landscape; social semiotics; sociolinguistics of globalisation; space as social practice; privatisation

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 25
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 365-379

Dates

published

2015-10-01

online

2015-10-06

Contributors

author

Milan Ferenčík

• Institute of British and American Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov, 17 Novembra 1, 08078 Prešov, Slovakia

References

• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Ben-Rafael, E. (2009). A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape. Expanding the scenery (pp. 40-54). New York and London: Routledge.
• Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., & Barni, M. (2010). Introduction. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp. xi-xxvii). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
• Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, Vol. XXXI. Advances in discourse processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bunčák, J., Džambazovič, R., Hrabovská, A., & Sopóci, J. (2011). K niektorým otázkam sociálnej stratifikácie slovenskej spoločnosti [Social stratification issues in Slovak society]. Sociológia, 43(5), 495-527.
• Canagarajah, S. (2007). The ecology of global English. International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(2), 89-100.
• Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ferenčík, M. (2014). Zákaz vjazdu - súkromný pozemok: konštruovanie súkromného priestoru v miestnej jazykovej krajine [No entry - private property: constructing private property in a local linguistic landscape]. In J. Kesselová, M. Imrichová, & M. Ološtiak (Eds.), Registre jazyka a jazykovedy (II) (pp. 295-302). Prešov: Prešovská univerzita.
• Gajdoš, P. (2009). Globalizačné súvislosti urbánneho vývoja a jeho sociálno-priestorové špecifiká [Globalisation context of urban development and its socio-spatial particularities]. Sociológia, 41(4), 304-328.
• Gal, S. (2005). Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public/private. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 23-37.
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
• Hampl, M. et al. (1996). Geografická organizace společnosti a transformační procesy v České republice [Geographical organisation of society and transformation processes in the Czech Republic]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
• Jaworski, A., & Yeung, S. (2010). Life in the Garden of Eden: The naming and imagery of residential Hong Kong. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp. 153-181). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
• Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
• Laihonen, P. (2015a). Indexing the local, state and global in the contemporary linguistic landscape of a Hungarian town in Slovakia. In J. Wachtarczyková, L.Satinská, & S. Ondrejovič (Eds.), Jazyk v politických, ideologických a interkultúrnych vzťahoch [Language in political, ideological and intercultural relations]. Sociolinguistica Slovaca, 8. Bratislava: VEDA. (forthcoming)
• Laihonen, P. (2015b). Beware of the dog! Private linguistic landscapes in two ‘Hungarian’ villages in South-West Slovakia. Language Policy, 14(1).
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell Publishing.
• Marcuse, P., & van Kempen, R. (Eds.) (2000). Globalising cities: A new spatial order? Oxford: Blackwell.
• Ondrejovič, S. (2013). Jazyková situácia a jazyková politika - druhé dejstvo [Language and language politics - the second act]. In S. Ondrejovič, J.Vrábľová, & A. Krausová (Eds.), Jazyk a diskurz v kultúrnom a politickom kontexte [Language and discourse in a cultural and political context] (pp. 23-30). Bratislava: VEDA.
• Patterson, M. (2011). In between public and private: Emerging spaces in cities. Retrieved from http://individual.utoronto.ca/matt_page/patterson_2011_betweenpublicprivate.pdf
• Pavlenda, V. et al. (1965). Politická ekonómia socializmu [Political economics of socialism]. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo politickej literatúry.
• Pavlenko, A. (2009). Language conflict in post-Soviet linguistic landscapes. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 17(1-2), 247-274.
• Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. London and New York: Routledge.
• Satinská, L. (2013). Jazyková krajina - naša realita v nápisoch. [Language country: Slovak reality in signs]. Romboid, 48(1), 82-85.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003) Discourses in place. Language in the material world. London and New York: Routledge.
• Sloboda, M. (2009). State ideology and linguistic landscape: A comparative analysis of (post)communist Belarus, Czech Republic and Slovakia. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 173–188). London, New York: Routledge.
• Steger, M. B. (2005). Ideologies of globalization. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(1), 11-30.
• Shohamy, E., & Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 313-331). London and New York: Routledge.
• Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wierzbicka, A. ([1991] 2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Yurchak, A. (2000). Privatize your name: Symbolic work in a post-Soviet linguistic market. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 406-434. [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/humaff-2015-0029