Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2015 | 25 | 4 | 421-429

Article title

The Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity – Interpretations, Challenges, Suggestions

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article deals with one of the most problematic principles of just war theory. It looks at the usage of the terms civilian, innocent and non-combatant and suggests how they can be interpreted. The principle of non-combatant immunity remains a real challenge for just war theory in the 21st century as it is designed to protect a specific group of people in times of war. The article considers the problematic issue of targeting non-combatants in war times as well as suggesting how we might better comprehend the problem.

Publisher

Journal

Year

Volume

25

Issue

4

Pages

421-429

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-10-01
online
2015-10-06

Contributors

  • Institute of Ethics and Bioethics, Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov, 17. Novembra 1, 08078 Prešov, Slovakia

References

  • Abdullah, S. (2002). The soul of a terrorist: Reflections on our war with the “other”. In Chris E. Stout (Ed.), The psychology of terrorism: A public understanding ( pp. 129-141). London: Praeger.
  • Bass, G. J. (2004). Jus post bellum. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 384-412. Retrieved from: https://www.princeton.edu/~gjbass/docs/juspost.pdf [Crossref]
  • Eco, U. (2004). Five moral pieces. London: Seker & Warburg.
  • Fisher, D. (2011). Morality and war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • French, S. E. (2003). Murderers, not warriors. In J. P. Sterba (Ed.), Terrorism and international justice (pp. 31-46). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Graham, G. (2008). Ethics and international relations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Guthrie, C., & Quinlan, M. (2007). Just war. The just war tradition: Ethics in modern warfare. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Johnson, J. T. (2000). Maintaining the protection of non-combatants. Journal of Peace Research, 37(4), 421-448.[Crossref]
  • Kapitan, T. (2015, June 30). Can terrorism be justified? Retrieved from: http://www.niu.edu/phil/~kapitan/pdf/CanTerrorismbeJustified.pdf
  • Novotny, D. D. (2007). What is terrorism? In E. V. Linden (Ed.), Focus on terrorism, Volume 8 (pp. 23-32). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Ohlsson, R. (1979). The moral import of evil. Stockholm: Akademilitt.
  • Orend, B. (2006). The morality of war. Toronto: Broadview Press.
  • Primoratz, I. (2002). State terrorism and counterterrorism. Retrieved from: http://tamilnation.co/terrorism/igor.htm
  • Rawls, J. (1993). The law of peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(4), 36-68.[Crossref]
  • Slim, H. (2007). Killing civilians. London: Hurst Publishers Ltd.
  • Stahn, C., & Kleffner, J. K. (Eds.). (2008). Jus post bellum. Towards a law of transition from conflict to peace. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. Retrieved from: http://www.elac.ox.ac.uk/downloads/Rodin_Two_Emerging_Issues_of_Jus_Post_Bellum.pdf
  • Velek, J. (2013). Státnik v roli tragického hrdiny? Spravedlivá válka a nejvyšší ohrožení. Filosofický časopis, 61(4), 497-523.
  • Walzer, M. (2004). Arguing about war. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_humaff-2015-0034
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.