From Cow to Cradle. Mutations and Meanings of Rural Household in Post-socialism

• Authors: Vintilă Mihăilescu
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article points at the path to modernization of the recent Romanian households, meaning, in this case, the out ruling of productive activities from the household’s space and time (Max Weber). A brief social history of the household (gospodărie) tries to trace back this longue durée process focusing on the shift in the work ethics from a normative model of the ‘good householder’ to an ‘aesthetisation of life’ (Max Weber) and symbolic emancipation. The main interest of the article concerns the relatively new phenomenon of ‘rustic houses’, which is less an architectural, than a lifestyle choice. Contrasted with the former ‘pride houses’ that spread all over the Romanian villages in the last decade, the peasant rustic taste seems to express a kind of return to the local and the past articulated with a modern concern for comfort and appearance: ‘rustic is traditional and modern in the same time!’ – claimed one of our informants. Rusticity thus becomes a (post)modern simulacrum of genuine peasant life. The final part of the article tries to transcend this mere semantic overview in search of its deeper and subjective motivations. In doing so, the article is approaching these recent rural households in the terms of Axel Honneth’s social recognition theory. It also suggests that, in this respect, the rustic taste expresses an existential search for authenticity.

Keywords

EN

domestic; rustic; modernity; simulacrum; social recognition; authenticity

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 35-63

Dates

published

2011-06-01

online

2015-05-04

Contributors

author

Vintilă Mihăilescu

• National School of Political and Administrate Sciences

References

• Andreesco, I., Mihaela B. (1986) Mourir à l’ombre des Carpathes. Paris: Editions Payot.
• Andreesco, I. (1996) Le hors-la et le chant funéraire du sapin en Oltenie. Cahiers de littérature orale, 39-40, 117-37.
• Baudrillard, J. (1981) Simulacres et Simulation. Paris: Editions Galilée.
• Bourdieu, P. (1979) La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de minuit.
• Broch, H. (2001) Quelques remarques à propos du kitsch. Paris: Editions Allia.
• Caillé, A. (2007) Introduction. In A. Caillé (eds.) La quête de reconnaissance. Nouveau Phénomène social total. Paris: Editions de la découverte / Bibliothèque du M/A/U/S/S: 5-14.
• Chiribucă, D. and Ţigănaş, S. (2010) (eds.). Arhitect în România. Studiu de fundamentare a politicilor naţionale pentru arhitectură. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Eikon.
• Chirot, D. (1976) The Romanian Communal Village: An Alternative to the Zadruga. In R. F. Byrnes (ed.) Communal Families in the Balkans: The Zadruga. Essays by Philip E. Mosely and Essays in His Honor, pp. 139-159. Notre Dame, London: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
• Cimpoieru, C. (2010) A new peasant culture: from rurality to rusticity in a Romanian village. In A VII-a Conferinţă Naţională a Societăţii de Antropologie Culturală din România, Bucureşti, 24-26 septembrie.
• Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement):95-120.[Crossref]
• Coroş, C. (2000) ‘Casele făloase’. Habitat, rudenie şi schimb în satul Şotânga, jud. Dâmboviţa. Teză de licenţă în sociologie, Universitatea din Bucureşti.
• Crăciun, E. M. (2009) An ethnography of fake brands in Turkey and Romania. PhD dissertation, University College London.
• Creed, G. (1995) Agriculture and domestication of industry in rural Bulgaria. American Ethnologist, 22(3): 528-548.[Crossref]
• Dejours, C. (2007) Psychanalyse et psychodynamique du travail : ambiguités de la reconnaissance. In A. Caillé (ed.) La quête de reconnaissance. Nouveau Phénomène social total, pp.58-70. Paris: Editions de la découverte / Bibliothèque du M/A/U/S/S.
• Dolan, A. J. (1999) ‘I’ve always fancied owning me own lion’. Ideological motivations in external house decoration by recent homeowners. In I. Cieraad (ed.) At Home. An Anthropology of Domestic space. Syracuse, pp.60-72. NY: Syracuse University Press.
• Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. London: Ark.
• Drazin, A. (2001) A Man will get Furnished: Wood and Domesticity in Urban Romania. In Daniel Miller (ed.) Home possessions, pp.173-200. Oxford, NY: Berg.
• Drazin, A. (2005) Architecture without Architects: Building Home and State in Romania. Home Cultures, 2(2): 195-220.
• Ferguson, J. (1999) Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkely: University of California Press.
• Garoflid, C. (1938) Regimul agrar în România. Enciclopedia României, vol.I, pp. 577-585. Bucureşti: Imprimeria Naţională.
• Giurescu, D. (1990) The Raising of Romania’s Past. London: World Monuments Fund, New York and Architecture Design and Technology Press.
• Grimshaw, C. and Rasmussen, I. (2006) The New Country Style England. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
• Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Kideckel, D. (2006) Colectivism şi singurătate în satele româneşti. Ţara Oltului în perioada comunistă şi în primii ani după Revoluţie. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
• Kideckel, D. (2010) România postsocialistă. Munca, trupul şi cultura clasei muncitoare. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
• Kris, E. (2005) Le style rustique. Le moulage d’après nature. Paris: Editions Macula.
• Linholm, C. (2008) Culture and authenticity. London and New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
• MacClancy, J. (1997) Anthropology, art and contest. In MacClancy (ed.) Contesting Art: Art, Politics and Identity in the Modern World, pp.1-25. New York: Berg.
• MacClancy, J. (1997). Contesting Art: Art, Politics and Identity in the Modern World. New York: Berg.
• Mahon, M. (2000) The Visible Evidence of Cultural Producers. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29: 467-492.[Crossref]
• Mandras, H. (1995) Les sociétés paysannes. Paris : Editura Gallimard.
• Mihăilescu, V., Nicolau, V., Gheorghiu, M. and Drinovan, G. (1993) Snagov. Trois mises en perspective au sujet de la ‘systématisation’. Romanian Journal of Sociology, 4(1): 32-47.
• Mihăilescu, V., Nicolau, V., Gheorghiu, M. and Olaru, C. (1994) Blocul între loc şi locuire. Teme şi probleme de etnologie urbană. Revista de Cercetări Sociale, 1:70-89.
• Mihăilescu, V. and Nicolau, V. (1995) Du village à la ville et retour. La maisnie mixte diffuse en Roumanie. Bulletin of the Ethnographical Institute, XLIV: 77-84.
• Mihăilescu, V. (2000) La maisnie diffuse, du communisme au capitalisme: questions et hypotheses. Balkanologie, IV(2): 73-90,
• Mihăilescu, V. (2002) Vecini şi Vecinătăţi în Transilvania. Bucureşti: Editura Paideia.
• Mihăilescu, V. (2008) Quelle anthropologie pour quelle société? Société post-paysanne et ethnologie post-nationale en Roumanie. Anthropologie et Société, 32(1-2): 217-239.
• Mihăilescu, V. (2009) Locuinţa ţărănească şi metamorfozele lemnului. Secolul 21, 166-171.
• Mihăilescu, V. and Bogdan, I. (2009) ‘Produse de calitate’ şi patrimonializarea gustului în România. Sociologie Românească, VII(3): 37-50.
• Miller, D. (1988) Approprieting the State on the Council Estate. Man 23(2):353-372.
• Miller, D. (2001) Behind Closed Doors. In D. Miller (ed.) Home possessions, pp. 1-19. Oxford, New York: Berg.
• Moisa, D. (2010) Maisons de rêve au Pays d’Oaş. (Re)construction des identités sociales à travers le bâti dans la Roumanie socialiste et postsocialiste. Thèse
• présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval, Québec.
• Monterescu, D. (2009) To Buy or Not to Be: Trespassing the Gated Community. Public Culture, 21(2): 403-430.
• Muggleton, D. (2000) Inside subculture. The Postmodern Meaning of Style. Oxford, NY: Berg.
• Noica, C. (1989) [1943] Ce e etern şi ce e istoric în cultura românească. In C. Noica. Istoricitate şi eternitate. Repere pentru o istorie a culturii româneşti, pp.20-40. Bucureşti: Editura Capricorn.
• O’Leary, A. S. (2006) Rustic revisited. New York: Watson-Guptill Publication.
• Petrescu, P. (1975) Transformări în arhitectura populară românească. Studii şi cercetări de istoria artei. Seria artă plastică, XXII: 139-147.
• Pine, B. J.II, Gilmore, H. J. (2010) Economia experienţei. Orice afacere e o scenă şi tot ce faci e un spectacol. Bucureşti: Editura Publica.
• Popescu, C. (2004) Le style national roumain. Construire une nation à travers l’architecture. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
• Ricœur, P. (2004) Parcours de la reconnaissance. Paris: Editura Gallimard.
• Rotariu, T. (2010) Studii demografice. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
• Sandu, D. (2007) Community selectivity of temporary emigration from Romania. Romanian Journal of Population Studies, 1-2: 11-45.
• Sandu, D. (2010) Lumile sociale ale migraţiei româneşti în străinătate. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
• Stahl, H. H. (1938) Organizarea socială a ţărănimii. Enciclopedia României, vol. I., pp.559-576. Bucureşti: Imprimeria Naţională.
• Stahl, H. H. (1958-1965) Contribuţii la studiul satelor devălmaşe româneşti, vol.I (1958), vol.II (1959), vol.III (1965). Bucureşti: Editura Academiei.
• Stahl, P. H. (1964) Case noi ţărăneşti. Studii şi cercetări de istoria artei, XI: 15-33.
• Stahl, P. H (1973) L’organisation magique du territoire villageois roumain. L’homme, XIII(3):150-162.
• Stahl, P. H. (2000) Triburi şi sate din sud-estul Europei. Bucureşti: Editura Paideia.
• Szelenyi, I., Manchin, R., Juhász, P., Magyar, B. and Martin, B. (1988) Socialist Entrepreneurs. Embourgeoisement in Rural Hungary. Cambridge: University of Wisconsin Press, Madison and Polity Press.
• Vasile, M. (2010) Territoriality and kinship in early Europe. The Romanian case and the theses of Henri H. Stahl. Sociologie Românească, VIII(2): 21-44.
• Voirol, O. (2007) ‘Axel Honeth et la sociologie. Reconnaissance et théorie critique à l’épreuve de la recherche sociale’. In A. Caillé (ed.) La quête de reconnaissance. Nouveau Phénomène social total, pp.243-268. Paris: Editions de la découverte / Bibliothèque du M/A/U/S/S.
• von Hirschhausen, B. (1997) Les nouvelles campagnes roumaines. Paradoxes d’un ‘retour’ paysan. Paris: Editions Belin.
• Vulcănescu, M. (1997) Teoria şi sociologia vieţii economice. Prolegomene la studiul morfologiei economice a unui sat. In M. Vulcănescu. Prolegomene sociologice la satul românesc, pp.148-166. Bucureşti: Editura Eminescu.
• Tudora, I. (2009) Case frumoase/case urâte în peisajul bucureştean. In V. Mihăilescu (ed.) Etnografii urbane, pp. 51-64. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
• Tylor, C. (2006) Etica autenticităţii. Cluj: Editura Idea Design & Print.
• Weber, M. (1934/1993) Etica protestantă şi spiritul capitalismului. Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas.
• Weber, M. (1995) Economie et société / 2. L’organisation et les puissances de la société dans leur rapport avec l’économie. Paris: Editura Plot.
• *** (2009) Migration and Remittances Trends 2009. In Migration and Development Brief, 11, November 3, Migration and Remittances Team, Development Prospects Group, World Bank.
• *** (2009) O ţară şi două agriculturi. România şi reforma Politicii Agricole Comune a UE, CRPE, Policy Memo nr. 4, octombrie, expert politici agricole: Lucian Luca, editor: Cristian Ghinea.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2011-0010