Prenatal Googling: Online Information Seeking by Israeli Women During Pregnancy

• Authors: Eimi Lev
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In recent years, the internet has become a popular medium for pregnant women seeking pregnancy-related information (Gao et al., 2012; Lagan, Sinclair & Kernohan, 2010; Romano, 2007; Song, West, Lundy & Smith-Dahmen, 2012). This study which utilized a qualitative approach explores Israeli women’s online information seeking during pregnancy. Israel is an especially interesting and important case study for exploring pregnancy-related internet use, because Israel has the highest rate of prenatal testing in the world (Lavi, 2010). The findings of this study indicated that the most prominent type of information sought by Israeli pregnant women online was focused on prenatal tests. The internet as a source of pregnancy-related information seems to function not just as a means to fulfill personal informational needs, but also to represent a broader social phenomenon of a highly medicalized pregnancy that seem to intensify uncertainty and therefore, to increase the need to rely on the internet during pregnancy.

Keywords

EN

internet; pregnancy; health information seeking; prenatal tests; Israel

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 69-87

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2015-05-06

Contributors

author

Eimi Lev

• Department of Communication Tel-Aviv University

References

• Aaronson, L. S., Mural, C. M., & Pfoutz, S. K. (1988) Seeking information: Where do pregnant women go? Health Education Quarterly, 15(3): 335-345.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Babrow, A. S. (2001) Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51(3): 477-497.
• Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998) Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. S. (2002) Uses and gratifications of the internet. In C. A. Lin & D. J. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society (pp. 379-407). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
• Chung, D. S., & Sujin, K. (2008). Blogging activity among cancer patients and their companions: Uses, gratifications, and predictors of outcomes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2): 297-306[Crossref]
• Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Crum, J. A. (2000) The Whole nine months and then some: Pregnancy, childbirth, and early parenting resources on the internet. In M. S. Wood & J. M. Coggan (eds.), Women’s health on the internet (pp. 99-111). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
• December, J. (1996) Units of analysis for internet communication. Journal of Communication, 46(1): 14-38.[Crossref]
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research third edition (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• de Jong, A., Dondorp, W.J., Die-Smulders, D.E, Frints, S.E.M.,de Wert, G.M. (2010). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Ethical issues explored. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18: 272–277.[Crossref]
• Dervin, B. (1983) Information as a user construct: The relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation. In S.A. Ward & L.J. Reed (eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 153-184). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Dervin, B. (1992) From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. Glazier & R. Powell (eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp.61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
• Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006) Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2): 193-210[Crossref]
• Dragonas, T., & Christodoulou, G. N. (1998). Prenatal Care. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(2): 127-142.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Elsenbruch, S., Benson, S., Rücke, M., & Dudenhausen, J. (2007) Social support during pregnancy: Effects on maternal depressive symptoms, smoking and pregnancy outcome. Human Reproduction, 22(3): 869-877.
• Flick, U. (2002) An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
• Fox, S. (2011) Accessing Health Topics on the Internet., Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC. Web site: (consulted, 30, August, 2012).
• Gao, L.L., Larsson, M., & Luo, S.Y. (2012) Internet use by Chinese women seeking pregancy-related information. Midwifery. (consulted, 8, March, 2013).[Crossref]
• Gofin, R., Adler, B., & Palti, H. (2004) Screening tests in prenatal care: A national study in Israel. Israeli Medical Association Journal, 6: 535-539.
• Hanna-Leena, M., & Lauri, S. (1999) Fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth: Experiences of women who have recently given birth. Midwifery, 15(3): 177-182.
• Heper, M.M., Cohen, R.L., Beiteman, E.T., & Eaton, L. (1968) Life-events and acceptance of pregnancy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 12: 183-188.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2003) Around the World Wide Web in 80 days. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3): 304-325.[Crossref]
• Jones, K. (1990) Expectant fears. Nursing Times, 86: 36-38.
• Katz, E., Blumer, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974) Uses of mass communication by the individual. In W.P. Davidson (Ed.), Mass communication research: Major issues and future directions (pp.11-35). New York: Praeger.
• Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Hass, H. (1973) On the use of mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38: 164-181.[Crossref]
• Lagan, B., Sinclair, M., & Kernohan, W. G. (2006) Pregnant women’s use of the internet: A review of published and unpublished evidence. Evidence Based Midwifery, 4(1): 17-23.
• Lagan, B., Sinclair, M., & Kernohan, W. G. (2010) Internet use in pregnancy informs women’s decision making: A web-based survey. Birth, 37: 106-115.[PubMed]
• Lavi, S. (2010) The paradox of Jewish bioethics in Israel: The case of reproductive technologies. In A. Voigt (Ed.), Religion in bioethischen Diskursen: Interdisziplinäre, internationale und interreligiöse Perspektiven, 23: 81-102.
• Lemire, M., Pare, G., Sicotte, C., & Harvey, C. (2008) Determinants of internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(11): 723-734.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Lorence, P. L., Park, H., & Fox, S. (2006) Assessing health consumerism on the web: A demographic profile of information-seeking behaviors. Journal of Medical Systems, 30(4): 251-258.[Crossref]
• Mano, Mesch, & Tsamir (2011) Social Inequalities in Access and Use of Information and Health Electronic Services in Israel. Maccabi Health Services Research Fund: Tel Aviv.
• McQuail, D. (1994) The rise of media of mass communication. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Mass communication theory: An introduction (pp.1-29). London: Sage.
• Mishori-Dery, A., Carmi, R., & Shoham-Vardi, I. (2007) Different perceptions and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among service providers and consumers in Israel. Community Genetics, 10(4): 242-251.[Crossref]
• Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004) How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health Information: A cross-cultural review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(5): 497-510.
• Neelapala, P., Duvvi, S. K., Kumar, G., & Kumar, B. N. (2008) Do gynecology outpatients use the internet to seek health information? A questionnaire survey. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2): 300-3004.
• Newhagen, J.E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996) Why communication researchers should study the internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46: 4-13.[Crossref]
• Nwagwu, W. E. (2007). The Internet as a source of reproductive health information among adolescent girls in an urban city in Nigeria. BMC Public Health, 7(354). unpaginted, Retrieved September 1, 2012 from:
• Rapp, R. (1994) The power of ‘positive’ diagnosis: Medical and maternal discourses on amniocentesis. In D. Bassin, M. Honey, & M. M. Kaplan (Eds.), Representation of motherhood (pp. 204-219). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Remennick, L. (2006) The quest for the perfect baby: Why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health and Illness, 28(1): 21-53.[PubMed]
• Robertson, A. (2006) Medlineplus medical encyclopedia. (consulted, 18, Aug, 2012).
• Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Romano, A. (2007) A changing landscape: Implications of pregnant women’s internet use for childbirth educators. Journal of Prenatal Education, 16(4): 18-24.
• Rubin, A.M. (1983) Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27: 37-51.[Crossref]
• Rubin, A.M. (1994) Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs, 60, 98-105.
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1): 3-37.
• Shiloh, S., Ben-Sinai, R., & Keinan, G. (1999) Effects of controllability, predictability, and information seeking style on interest in predictive genetic testing. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10): 1187-1195.[Crossref]
• Singh, D., Newburn, M., Smith, N., & Wiggins, M. (2002) The information needs of first-time pregnant mothers. British Journal of Midwifery, 10(1): 54-58.[Crossref]
• Sjöström, H., Langius-Eklöf, A., & Hjertberg, R. (2004) Well-being and sense of coherence during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83(12): 1112-1118.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Song, F.W., West, J.E., Lundy, L., & Smith-Dahmen, N. (2012) Women, Pregnancy, and Health Information Online: The Making of Informed Patients and Ideal Mothers. Gender & Society, 26: 773-798.
• Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004) Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2): 259-288.[Crossref]
• Stern, M.J., Cotten, S. R., & Drentea, P. (2012) The separate spheres of online health gender, parenting, and online health information searching in the information age. Journal of Family Issues, 33(10): 1324–1350[Crossref]
• Talosig-Garcia, M., & Davis, S. (2005) Information-seeking behavior of minority breast cancer patients: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1): 53-64.[Crossref]
• Tang, E., & Lee, W. (2006) Singapore internet users’ health information search: Motivation, perception of information sources, and self efficacy. In M. Murero & R. E. Rice (Eds.), The internet and health Care: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 107-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Terrell, P. E. (2007) Counseling pregnancy, politics, and biomedicine: Empowering discernment. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Pastoral Press.
• Tipping, V. G. (1981) The vulnerability of a primipara during the antepartal period. Maternal Baby Nursing Journal, 10: 61-77.
• Turner, D. W. (2010) Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3): 754-760.
• Usui, N., Kamiyama, M., Tani, G., Kanagawa, T., & Fukuzawa, M. (2011) Use of the medical information on the internet by pregnant patients with a prenatal diagnosis of neonatal disease requiring surgery. Pediatric surgery international, 27(12): 1289-1293.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Wald, H. S., Dube, C. E., & Anthony, D. C. (2007) Untangling the web: The impact of internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(3): 218-224.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Warren, C. A. (2002) Qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Weiss, M. (2002) The chosen body: The politics of the body in Israeli society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Young, I. M. (1995) Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation. In N. Tuana & R. Tong (eds.), Feminism and philosophy: Essential readings in theory, reinterpretation, and application (pp. 407-430). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2013-0011