The Spread of Asian Tiger Mosquitoes and Related Health Risks Along the French Riviera: An Analysis of Reactions and Concerns Amongst the Local Population

• Authors: Cécilia Claeys , Elise Mieulet
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Since the early 2000s, the accidental introduction of the tiger mosquito has exposed Europe to new diseases previously observed in Southern countries, leading to the onset of new nuisances and health risks. In France, the area first affected was the French Riviera. Based on the results of a qualitative and quantitative survey, this article analyses the reactions and concerns amongst the local population regarding the spread of Asian tiger mosquitoes and the related health risks. While residents are well aware of the mosquitoes’ presence and perceive a related increase in nuisances at different levels, they tend to play down the related health risks, notably due to the high degree of trust placed in the French healthcare system. It is the wealthiest inhabitants that are most affected by the problem, which primarily affects villa districts. Finally, cultural resistance has hindered the success of awareness-raising campaigns due to the stigma associated with mosquitoes.

Keywords

EN

asian tiger mosquito; population reactions; population concerns; qualitative and quantitative sociological survey

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 151-173

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2015-05-06

Contributors

author

Cécilia Claeys

• Population Environment & Development Laboratory, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille

author

Elise Mieulet

• Population Environment & Development Laboratory, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille

References

• Alaszewski, A. (2003) ‘Risk, Trust and Health’, Health, risk & society, Vol. 5, No.3, November 2003.
• Bakir, V. (2010) ‘Media and risk: old and new research directions’, Journal of Risk Research Vol. 13, No. 1, January 2010, pp. 5-18.
• Bartley, M. and D. Blane and S. G, Davey (1998) The Sociology of Health Inequalities. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
• Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. SAGE Publications.
• Beck, U. (1999) World risk society. Malden, MA: Polity.
• Beck, U. (2007) ‘Beyond class and nation: reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world’, The British Journal of Sociology, Volume 58 Issue 4, pp. 679-704.
• Boltanski, L. (1971) Les usages sociaux du corps, Annales Économies, sociétés, civilisations, 26(1), pp. 205–233.
• Bourdieu, P. (1979) The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relations to Culture. University of Chicago Press.
• Castel, R. (1995) Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Paris, Fayard.
• Claeys, C. and L. Nicolas (2009), ‘ Le moustique fauteur de troubles’, Ethnologie Française. XXXIX, 1-janvier, pp. 109–116.
• Crawshaw, P. and R. Bunton (2009) ‘Logics of practice in the ‘risk environment’’, Health, Risk and Society, 11 (3): 269–282.
• Derex, J. M. (2008) ‘Géographie sociale et physique du paludisme et des fièvres intermittentes en France du XVIIIe au XXe siècles’, Histoire, économie & société, 2(27) : 39-59.
• Douglas, M. and A. B. Wildavsky (1982) Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers.
• Douglas, M. And M. Calvez, (1990) ‘The self as risk taker: A cultural theory of contagion in relation to AIDS’, The Sociological Review, 38(3):445–464.
• Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Londres & New York: Routledge.
• Epstein, P. R. (2007) ‘Chikungunya fever resurgence and global warming’, The American Society of Tropical Medecine and Hygiene, 76(3): 403–404.
• Erickson, R. A. and S. M. Presley S. M. and L. J. S. Allen and K. R. Long and S. B. Cox (2010) ‘A stage-structured, Aedes albopictus population model’, Ecological Modelling, Volume 221, Issue 9, 10 May 2010, pp. 1273–1282
• Fillion, E. (2009) À l’épreuve du sang contaminé. Pour une sociologie des affaires médicales. Paris, EHESS.
• Frewer L. J. and J. Scholderer and L. Bredahl (2003) ‘Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: The mediating role of trust’, Risk analysis, 23 (6):1117–1133.[PubMed]
• Gallopin, C. (2009) ‘Vers une démocratie totalitaire ?’, Erès/VST-vie sociale et traitements, Vol. 4, N°104:78–81.
• Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.
• Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
• Grize J. B, Adam J. M, Bouacha M. A. (2004). Textes et discours: catégories pour l’analyse. Dijon, Éditions Universitaires de Dijon.
• Grize J. B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communications. Paris, PUF, 1996.
• Habermas, J. (German (1962) English Translation 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Thomas Burger, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press.
• Inglehart, R. (1999) ‘Globalization and postmodern values’, The Washington Quarterly, 23(1): 215–228.
• Marmot, M and Wilkinson (1999) Social determinants of health. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 64–80.
• Merrien, F. X. (1997) L’Etat-providence. Paris, PUF (Que sais je? N°3249).
• Merrien, F. X. and R. Parchet and A. Kernen (2005) L’Etat social. Une perspective internationale. Paris, Armand Colin (Collection U).
• Nicol A. M. and C. and W. McDowall and K. Bartlett and N. (2008) ‘Communicating the risks of a new, emerging pathogen: the case of Cryptococcus gattii’, Risk analysis, Vol. 28, no. 2, 2008: 373–386.
• Oliver-Smith, A. and S. M. Hoffman (2002) Theorizing Disasters: Nature, Power and Culture. in Oliver-Smith A., Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster, Santa Fe, School of American Research Press.
• Petrie, K. J. and A. W. Weinman (1997) Perceptions of health & illness. Amsterdam: Harwood academic publishers.
• Pidgeon, N. and al., (1992) Risk perception. The Royal Society, ed. Risk: analysis, perception and management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group. London: The Royal Society, 89–134.
• Raude, J. and M. Setbon (2009) ‘The role of environmental and individual factors in the social epidemiology of chikungunya disease on Mayotte Island’, Health and Place, vol. 15: 659–669.
• Reiter, B. P. (2010) ‘Yellow fever and dengue: a threat to Europe?’. Euro Surveill, 15 (10)[PubMed]
• Rohrmann, B. (1992) ‘The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness’, Acta Psychologica, 81: 169–192.[Crossref]
• Rosanvallon, P. (1981) La crise de l’Etat-providence. Paris, Seuil.
• Sandman, P. M. and N. D. Weinstein and W.K. Hallman (1998) ‘Communications to Reduce Risk Underestimation and Overestimation’, Risk Decision and Policy, 3(2):,93–108.
• Setbon, M. and J. Raude (2008) ‘Chikungunya on Reunion Island: social, environmental and behavioral factors in an Epidemic Context’, Population-E, vol. 63(3): 491–518.
• Siegrist, M. (2000) ‘The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology’, Risk Analysis, 20 (2): 195–204.[PubMed]
• Siegrist, M. and G. Cvetkovich (2000) ‘Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge’, Risk Analysis, 20 (5): 713–719.[PubMed]
• Silver, J. B. (2008) Mosquito ecology: Field Sampling Methods. Third Edition, Springer.
• Slovic, P. (2000) The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
• Slovic, P. and M. L. Finuca and E. Peters and D. G. Mac Gregor (2004) ‘Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality’, Risk Analysis, 24(2): 311–322.
• Sourisseau, M. and C. Schilte and N. Casartelli et al. (2007) ‘Characterization of reemerging chikungunya virus’, PLoS Pathog. 3 (6).[PubMed]
• Vazeille, M. and C. Jeannin and E. Martin and F. Schaffner and A. Failloux (2008). ‘Chikungunya: A risk for Mediterranean countries?’, Acta Tropica, 105 (2008) 200–202.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Wilkinson, I. (2009) ‘Grasping the Point of Unfathomable Complexity: The New Media Research and Risk Analysis’, Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, January 2010, pp.19–28.
• Wynne, B. (1982) Institutional mythologies and dual societies in the management of risk, In: H.C. Kunreuther and E.V. Ley, eds. The risk analysis controversy. An institutional perspective. Berlin: Springer, 127–143.
• Wynne, B. (1989) Frameworks of rationality in risk management: towards the testing of naive Sociology, In: J. Brown, ed. Environmental threats: perception, analysis and management. London: Belhaven Press, 33–47.
• Zimmerman, R. (1993) ‘Social Equity and Environmental Risk’, Risk Analysis, 13: 649–666.
• Zinn, J. O. (2008) ‘Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty’, Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 10, No. 5: 439–450.
• Zinn, J. O. (2009) ‘The sociology of risk and uncertainty: A response to Judith Green’s ‘Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’?’, Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 11, No. 6, December 2009, pp. 509–526.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2013-0015