Less than Friends, More than Acquaintances: Artists, Markets and Gallery Openings in New York

• Authors: Martin G Fuller
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article describes one way that unknown and ‘emerging’ artists with limited exhibition history or reputation take steps towards developing their careers. Artists cannot apply directly for exhibition opportunities, therefore they develop social associations with gallerists that are described as being ‘kind-of-friendly-with’. Using a descriptive ethnographic narrative drawn from a case study of artists as they navigate an evening of commercial gallery openings in New York’s Chelsea district, it is argued that establishing a career in contemporary visual art depends on the ability to render one’s self visible to other participants in an art world. Rather than viewing the symbolic value of artworks as antagonistic with the economic art market, artists seek to establish social associations in which different forms of value are interrelated. In conclusion it is suggested that this is an art world in which the ‘economic world reversed’ is inversed.

Keywords

EN

contemporary art; artists; careers; New York; art galleries

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 120-129

Dates

published

2015-10-01

received

2014-10-01

accepted

2015-02-15

online

2015-10-30

Contributors

author

Martin G Fuller

References

• Ault, J. (2002). Alternative Art, New York, 1965-1985: A Cultural Politics Book for the Social Text Collective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Becker, H. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. Media, Culture and Society, 2, 261–293.
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed. Poetics, 12(4), 311–356.[Crossref]
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Market of Symbolic Goods. Poetics, 14(1), 13–44.[Crossref]
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge, MA: Columbia University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bruyne, P. de, & Gielen, P. (Eds.). (2011). Community Art: The Politics of Trespassing. Amsterdam: Valiz.[WoS]
• Bürger, P. (1984). Theory of the Avant-Garde. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Busta, C. (2011). Body Doubles. In I. Graw, D. Birnbaum, & N. Hirsch (Eds.), The Reutrn of the Human Figure in Semiocapitalism. Berlin: Sternberg.
• Crane, D. (1987). The Transformation of the Avant-Garde: The New York Art World, 1940-1985. London: University of Chicago Press.
• Durkheim, E. (2001). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Galenson, D. W. (2000). The Careers of Modern Artists: Evidence from Auctions of Contemporary Art. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24, 87–112.
• Galenson, D. W. (2011). Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Gertler, M. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic Geography of Context, or The Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99.[Crossref]
• Graña, C. (1990). The Ideological Significance of Bohemian Life. In M. Graña & C. Graña (Eds.), On Bohemia: The Code of the Self-Exiled (pp. 3–12). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–80.[Crossref]
• Guilbaut, S. (1983). How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: Abstract Expressionism, Freedom and the Cold War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Halle, D., & Tiso, E. (2009). The Sociology of the New Art Gallery Scene in Chelsea, Manhattan. In J. Amariglio, J. W. Childers, & S. E. Cullenberg (Eds.), Sublime Economy: on the intersection of art and economies. London: Routledge.
• Heinich, N. (1998). Le Triple Jeu de l’Art Contemporain. Sociologie des Arts Plastiques. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
• Kostelanetz, R. (2003). Soho: The Rise and Fall of an Artists’ Colony. New York: Routledge.
• Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lloyd, R. (2005). Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Postindustrial City. New York: Routledge.[WoS]
• McRobbie, A. (2004). Making a Living in London’s Small-Scale Creative Sector. In D. Power & A. J. Scott (Eds.), Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture. Oxford: Routledge.
• Molotch, H., & Treskon, M. (2009). Changing Art: SoHo, Chelsea and the Dynamic Geography of Galleries in New York City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 517–541.[WoS]
• Paper Monument (Ed.). (2009). I Like Your Work: Art and Etiquette. Brooklyn: Paper Monument.
• Quemin, A. (2006). Globalization and Mixing in the Visual Arts: An Empirical Survey of “High Culture” and Globalization. International Sociology, 21(4), 522–550.[Crossref]
• Roberts, D. (2012). From the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism to the Creative Economy: Reflections on the New Spirit of Art and Capitalism. Thesis Eleven, 110(1), 83–97.[Crossref]
• Seigel, J. (1999). Bohemian Paris: Culture, Politics, and the Boundaries of Bourgeois Life, 1830-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Simpson, C. R. (1981). SoHo: The Artist in the City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Urry, J. (2003). Social Networks, Travel and Talk. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 155–175.[Crossref]
• Velthuis, O. (2003). Symbolic Meaning of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries. Theory and Society, 32(2), 181–215.
• Velthuis, O. (2013). Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art: Why Local Ties Remain Dominant in Amsterdam and Berlin. European Societies, 15(2), 290–308.[Crossref][WoS]
• Zhao, S. (2003). Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 445–455.
• Zolberg, V., & Cherbo, J. M. (1997). Outsider Art: Contesting Boundaries in Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2015-0011