“What’s the Big Deal to Be Romanian if You Don’t Have What to Eat” : Food Practices in “Transition”

• Authors: Ciocănel Alexandra
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article examines some of the main changes in food practices from the first half of 1990s shaped by the new political and economic environment. Based mainly on an analysis of press articles from this period, three main themes are identified in the discussion of alimentation: “hunger”, queues, and new configurations of commerce. This article suggests that these are entangled in a changing culture of shortages specific to the 1980s through an adaptation of older practices of consumption and commercialization of food, discursive tropes and moral judgments. In this way, a simultaneously prospective and retrospective orientation appears in which some of the ethos of the previous social order is used in new ways of making sense of the present. Food plays an important role in this orientation, its rationalization and precariousness specific to the 1980s being now replaced by new worries and uncertainties raised by the economic measures of “transition”.

Keywords

EN

transition; culture of shortages; food practices; change

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Review of Social Research
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 40-48

Dates

published

2016-05-01

received

2016-02-27

accepted

2016-04-29

online

2016-08-06

Contributors

author

Ciocănel Alexandra

• University of Bucharest

References

• Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic Content Analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1): 65–77.
• Burawoy, M., and Verdery, K. (1999). ‘Introduction’ In Burawoy, M., and K. Verdery (eds.) Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World, pp. 1-18. Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Caldwell, M. L. (2009). ‘Introduction’ In Caldwell, M. L (ed.) Food and Everyday Life After State Socialism, pp. 1–28. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Campeanu, P. (1994). România. Coada pentru hrană. Un mod de viaţă. [Romania. Queue for Food. A Way of Life] Bucharest: Litera.
• Chelcea, L. (2002). ‘The Culture of Shortage During State-Socialism: Consumption Practices in a Romanian Village in the 1980s’. Cultural Studies, 16(1): 16–43.
• Collier, S. J. (2011). Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Gille, Z. (2009). ‘The Tale of the Toxic Paprika. The Hungarian Taste of Euro-Globalization’. In Caldwell, M. L (ed.) Food and Everyday Life After State Socialism, pp. 57–77. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Gupta, A. (2006). Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State. In Sharma, A. and Gupta A. (eds.) The Anthropology of the State. A Reader, pp. 211–242. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Humphrey, C. (2012). ‘Favors and “normal heroes.”’ HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(2): 22-41.
• Jung, Y. (2009). ‘From Canned Food to Canny Consumers. Cultural Competence in the Age of Mechanical Production’. In Caldwell, M. L (ed.) Food and Everyday Life After State Socialism, pp. 29–56. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Konstantinov, Y. (1996). Patterns of Reinterpretation. Trader-Tourism in the Balkans (Bulgaria) as a picaresque metaphorical enactment of post-totalitarism. American Ethnologist, 23(4): 762–782.[Crossref]
• Luhmann, N. (2000). The Reality of Mass Media. Standford: Stanford University Press.
• Ries, N. (2009). Potato ontology: Surviving postsocialism in Russia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(2): 181–212.
• Romanian Peasant Museum. (2008). Marturii orale. Anii ’90 si bucurestenii.[Oral Witnesses. 1990’s and Bucharest’s Residents] Bucharest: Paideia.
• Thompson, E. P. (1971) ‘The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century’. Past & Present, 50: 76-136.
• Verdery, K. (2003). Socialismul. Ce a fost si ce urmeaza. [What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next] Bucharest: European Institute.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/irsr-2016-0006