Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 4 | 1 | 86-98

Article title

Subjective perceptions of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) university teachers’ professional beginnings: Quantitative research into pedagogical content knowledge

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The aim of this paper is to present methodology and results of a quantitative phase within a research into English for Specific Purposes university teachers and their subjectively perceived changes in pedagogical content knowledge from a retrospective view of their professional beginnings. The introduction describes the investigated issues and explains key concepts. The first chapter refers to the theoretical background of teacher professional development. Since the quantitative research phase is a part of a mixed research design, the second chapter deals with the whole research including the research objective and questions. The third chapter is devoted to the quantitative research phase during which an anonymous electronic questionnaire was sent to the whole population of Czech university teachers of English for Specific Purposes and processed statistically as well as descriptively. The fourth chapter presents the obtained quantitative data discussed within the individual components of pedagogical content knowledge - conceptions of purposes for teaching subject matter, curricular knowledge, knowledge of instructional strategies, and knowledge of students’ understanding. The conclusion summarises all the information and proposes some recommendations for pedagogical practice.

Publisher

Year

Volume

4

Issue

1

Pages

86-98

Physical description

Dates

published
2016-01-01
online
2016-02-09

Contributors

  • Masaryk University, Faculty of Education Institute for Research in School Education Poříčí 31a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic

References

  • ANDERSON, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.
  • BAGARIČ, V., & DJIGUNOVIČ, J. M. (2007). Defining communicative competence. Metodika, 8(1), 94-103.
  • BARTÁK, J. (2008). Jak vzdělávat dospělé [How to educate adults]. Praha: Alfa Nakladatelství.
  • BERGMAN, M. M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271-275.[Crossref]
  • BERLINER, D. C. (1995). Teacher expertise. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (p. 46-52). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • BEVAN, R. M. (2004). Filtering, fragmenting, and fiddling? Teachers’ life cycles, and phases in their engagement with research. Teacher Development, 8(2), 325-339.
  • CANGELOSI, J. S. (2014). Classroom management strategies: Gaining and maintaining students’ cooperation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • CHRÁSKA, M. (2007). Metody pedagogického výzkumu: Základy kvantitativního výzkumu [Methods of pedagogical research: Fundamentals of quantitative research]. Praha: Grada. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (2001). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/elp/elpreg/Source/Key_reference/CEFR_EN.pdf
  • COOK, V. (2001). Second language learning and language teaching. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • DAKOWSKA, M. (2011). Teaching English as a foreign language. Warsawa: Wydavnictwo naukowe PWN.
  • DAY, CH., SAMMONS, P., STOBART, G., KINGTON, A., & QUING, G. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting lives, work and effectiveness. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
  • FAR, M. M. (2008). On the relationship between ESP & EGP: A general perspective. English for Specific Purposes World, 7(1), 1-11.
  • FESSLER, R., & INGRAM, R. (2003). The teacher career cycle revisited: New realities, new responses. In Davies, B. & West-Burnham, J. (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (s. 584-590). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
  • FIORITO, L. (2005). Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Available from http://www.usingenglish.com/teachers/articles/teaching-english-for-specific-purposes-esp.html
  • FULLER, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.[Crossref]
  • GAVORA, P. (2000). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu [Introduction to pedagogical research]. Brno: Paido.
  • GAVORA, P. (2005). Učitel a žáci v komunikaci [Teacher and students in communication]. Brno: Paido.
  • GAVORA, P. (2012). Tvorba výskumného nástroja pre pedagogické bádanie [Creating research tool for pedagogical research]. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.
  • GLATTHORN, A. (1995). Teacher development. In Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (s. 41-46). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • GROSSMAN, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • GUSKEY, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.
  • HARDING, K. (2007). English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • HENDL, J. (2008). Kvalitativní výzkum: Základní teorie, metody a aplikace [Qualitative research: Basic theories, methods and applications]. Praha: Portál.
  • HUTCHINSON, T., & WATERS, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • JANÍK, T., MAŇÁK, J., & KNECHT, P. (2009). Cíle a obsahy školního vzdělávání a metodologie jejich utváření [Objectives and contents of school education and methodology of their formation]. Brno: Paido.
  • JANÍKOVÁ, V. (2011). Výuka cizích jazyků zaměřená na žáka [Foreign language teaching focused on student]. In Janíková, V. a kol. (Ed.), Výuka cizích jazyků [Foreign language teaching] (p. 50-77). Praha: Grada.
  • JAŠKOVÁ, J. (2015, in print). Subjektivní percepce profesních počátků vysokoškolských učitelů odborné angličtiny: Kvalitativní výzkum didaktických znalostí obsahu [Subjective perceptions of English for Specific Purposes university teachers’ professional beginnings: Qualitative research into pedagogical content knowledge]. Pedagogická orientace, 25(5), 700-721.
  • JOYCE, B., & SHOVERS, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA USA: ASCD.
  • JUKLOVÁ, K. (2013). Začínající učitel z pohledu profesního vývoje [Beginning teacher from the perspective of professional development]. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
  • KAGAN, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.[Crossref]
  • KOHOUTEK, R. (1998). Metoda dotazníku pro pedagogy [Method of questionnaire for pedagogues]. Brno: CERM.
  • KORTHAGEN, F. KESSELS, J., KOSTER, B., LAGERWERF, B., & WUBBELS, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • LIGHTBOWN, P. M., & SPADA, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MAŇÁK, J. (1998). Rozvoj aktivity, samostatnosti a tvořivosti žáků [Development of pupils’ activity, independence and creativity]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  • MAYNARD, T., & FURLONG, J. (1995). Learning to teach and models of mentoring. In Kelly, T. & Mayes, A. S. (Eds.), Issues in mentoring (p. 10-30). London: Routledge.
  • MITCHELL, R., & MYLES, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. 2nd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • MUŽÍK, J. (2004). Androdidaktika [Androdidactics]. Praha: ASPI.
  • NIAS, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge. PALMER, D. J., STOUGH, L. M., BURDENSKI, T. K., & GONZALES, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist 40(1), 13-25.
  • PELIKÁN, J. (2011). Základy empirického výzkumu pedagogických jevů [Basics of empirical research of pedagogical phenomena]. Praha: Karolinum.
  • PÍŠOVÁ, M., NAJVAR, P., JANÍK, T., HANUŠOVÁ, S., KOSTKOVÁ, K., JANÍKOVÁ, V., ... ZERZOVÁ, J. (2011). Teorie a výzkum expertnosti v učitelské profesi [Theory and research of experts in teacher profession]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  • RAMSDEN, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
  • RANDALL, M., & THORNTON, B. (2001). Advising and supporting teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • REMMIK, M., KARM, M., & LEPP, L. (2013). Learning and developing as a university teacher: Narratives of early career academics in Estonia. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 330-341.
  • RYAN, K. (1986). The induction of new teachers. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
  • SHULMAN, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • SHULMAN, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.[Crossref]
  • SHULMAN, L. S., & SHULMAN, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.[Crossref]
  • SPILKOVÁ, V. (2011). Development of student teachers’ professional identity through constructivist approaches and self-reflective techniques. Orbis Scholae, 5(2), 117-138.
  • STEFFY, B. E., WOLFE, M. P., PASCH, S. H., & ENZ, B. J. (Eds.). (2000). Life cycle of the career teacher. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  • ŠIMONÍK, O. (1994). Začínající učitel: Některé pedagogické problémy začínajících učitelů [Beginning teacher: Some pedagogical problems of beginning teachers]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  • ŠVAŘÍČEK, R., & ŠEĎOVÁ, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách: Pravidla hry [Qualitative research in pedagogical sciences: Rules of the game]. Praha: Portál.
  • Van DRIEL, J. H., VERLOOP, N., & De VOS, W. (1998). Developing science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.[Crossref]
  • VanPATTEN, B., & WILLIAMS, J. (2007). Early theories in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (p. 17-35). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • VAŠUTOVÁ, J. (2002). Strategie výuky ve vysokoškolském vzdělávání [Teaching strategies in university education]. Praha: Pedagogická fakulta UK.
  • VEENMAN, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178. [Crossref]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_jolace-2016-0007
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.