New Zealand early childhood curriculum: The politics of collaboration

• Authors: Sandy Farquhar
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki (Ministry of Education [MoE],1996), is frequently hailed as a community inspired curriculum, praised nationally and internationally for its collaborative development, emancipatory spirit and bicultural approach. In its best form community can be collaborative, consultative, democratic, responsive and inclusive. But community and collaboration can also be about exclusion, alienation and loss. This paper engages with Te Whāriki as a contestable political document. It explores this much acclaimed early childhood curriculum within a politics of community, collaboration and control. Driving the direction of the paper is a call for a revitalised understanding of curriculum as practices of freedom, raising issues of how to work with difference and complexity in a democratic and ethical manner. The paper concludes that although official curriculum is unavoidably about control, there is a world of difference in the ways such control might be exercised. The real curriculum exists where teachers are working with children - it is in the everyday micro-practices that impacts are felt and freedoms played out.

Keywords

EN

early childhood; curriculum; politics; practices of freedom; New Zealand

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Pedagogy
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 57-70

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2016-03-05

Contributors

author

Sandy Farquhar

• University of Auckland, Faculty of Education and Social Work, School of Learning, Development and Professional Practice, 78 Epsom Avenue, Auckland, 1035, New Zealand

References

• Bhabha, H. (1990). Nation and narration. New York: Routledge.
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
• Connolly, W. (2013). The fragility of things. Self-organizing process, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
• Duhn, I. (2006). The making of global citizens: Traces of cosmopolitanism in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(3), 191-202.
• Farquhar, S. (2010). Ricoeur, identity and early childhood. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Foucault, M. (1989). Foucault live: Interviews, 1966-84 (J. Johnston, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).
• Foucault, M. (1994). The masked philosopher. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics. The essential works 1 (pp. 321-328). London: Penguin.
• Foucault, M. (2001). The subject and power. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power: The essential works 3 (pp. 326-48). London: Penguin.
• Ministry of Education. (2005 ). Kei tua o te pae assessment for learning: Early childhood exemplars. Wellington: Learning Media.
• Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki: He Whāriki Matauranga Mō Ngā Mokopuna o Aotearoa, Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
• May, H. (2009). Politics in the playground: The World of Early Childhood Education in New Zealand. Dunedin: Otago University Press.
• May, H. (1999). “[e-mail]: Mapping the landscape of the ‘century of the child’.” New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 9, 117-132.
• Moss, P. (2007). Meetings across the paradigmatic divide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 229-245.
• Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. Public policy, children and childhood. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
• Mouffe, C. (1988). Radical democracy: Modern or postmodern? In A. Ross (Ed.), Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Mutch, C., & Trim, B. (2013). Improvement, accountability and sustainability: A comparison of developments in the early childhood and schooling sectors. In J.
• Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki. New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. (pp. 71-91). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
• Nuttall, J. (2013). Weaving Te Whāriki. Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
• Pinar, W. (2009). The worldliness of a cosmopolitan education. Passionate lives in public service. New York: Routledge.
• Reedy, T. (2013). Toku rangatiratanga na te mana-matauranga. ‘Knowledge and power set me free …’. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki. Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 35-53). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
• Ricoeur, P. (2006). On Translation. (E. Brennan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Ricoeur, P. (2000). The just. (D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. (K. Blamey, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Ritchie, J. (2013). Te Whāriki and the promise of early childhood care and education grounded in a commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki. Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. (pp. 141-156). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
• Te One, S. (2013). The context for Te Whāriki: Contemporary issues of influence. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki. Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. (pp. 7-34). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
• Touraine, A. (1997). What is democracy? (Transl. D. Macey). Boulder, CO: Westview Press HarperCollins.
• Treaty of Waitangi Act, No. 114. (1985). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1975/0114/latest/DLM435368.html?src=qs
• Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), 6-23.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/jped-2015-0013