Using Analogies in Teaching Physics: A Study on Latvian Teachers' Views and Experience

• Authors: Lolita Jonāne
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The role of analogies as tools for teaching difficult science concepts has been widely discussed in science education. The application of analogies in the context of sustainable education involves richer potential. The purposeful use of appropriate analogies can facilitate analogical thinking and transfer skills, as well as develop abilities which are required for life and lifelong learning, including successful integration into modern society and facility within our technology saturated world. Analogical thinking supports development of students’ higher order thinking skills. The aim of this study was to identify Latvian physics teachers’ views on the importance of analogies and the methodology of their usage in physics education, as well as to discover innovative examples of analogies. The study involves both quantitative and qualitative methodology: survey of 35 secondary school physics teachers and group interviews with 18 experienced physics teachers. The findings reveal that, in general, now and then Latvian physics teachers use analogies in their pedagogical practice, although they are mostly simplistic and with illustrative character. Some teachers use analogies in order to help students build new knowledge through activating, transferring, and applying existing knowledge and skills in unfamiliar situations.

Keywords

EN

analogy; analogical thinking; transfer skills; teaching physics; teachers' views

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 53-73

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2015-11-26

Contributors

author

Lolita Jonāne

• Department of Physics and Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Daugavpils University, 1 Par‚des Street, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia

References

• Aubusson, P., Treagust, D., & Harrison, A. (2009). Learning and teaching science with analogies and metaphors. In S. M. Ritchie, K. Tobin, & W. M. Roth (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Australasia (pp. 199-216). Sense Publishers.
• Brown, D., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Factors influencing understanding in a teaching experiment. Instructional Science, 18, 237-261.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cruz-Hastenreiter, R. (2015). Analogies in high school classes on quantum physics. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 38-43.
• Dilber, R., & Duzgun, B. (2008). Effectiveness of analogy on students' success and elimination of misconceptions. Physics Education, 2(3), 174-183.
• Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
• Duit, R., Roth, W. M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (2001). Fostering conceptual change by analogies - between Scylla and Carybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 283-303.
• EC (European Commission). (2007). Science education now: A new pedagogy of the future of Europe. European Commission. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf
• EC (European Commission). (2013). Final Report Summary - ANALOGIES - KAPON (Analogical reasoning and conceptual change in physics education). Retrieved August 26, 2015, from http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/60416_en.html
• Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on reflective practice. Retrieved February 21, 2015, from http://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/files/opencetl/file/ecms/web-content/Finlay-(2008)- Reflecting-on-reflective-practice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
• Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). London: Cambridge University Press.
• Gentner, D. (2002). The analogy in scientific discovery: The case of Johannes Kepler. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 21-39). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher.
• Gerretson, H., Howes, E., Campbell, S., & Thompson, D. (2008). Interdisciplinary mathematics and science education through robotics technology: Its potential for Education for Sustainable Development (A case study from the USA). Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10(1), 32-41.
• Geske, A., Grīnfelds, A., Kangro, A., Kiseļova, R., & Mihno, L. (2013). OECD starptautiskie izglītības vides un skolēnu novērtēšanas pētījumi [OECD international educational environment and student assessment research]. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.
• Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 113-125). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
• Goodman, G. S. (2008). Coming to critical constructivism: Roots and branches. In G. S. Goodman (Ed.), Educational psychology: An application of critical constructivism (pp. 33-52). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
• Harrison, A. G., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Using analogies in middle and secondary science classrooms: The FAR guide - an interesting way to teach with analogies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies: Friend or foe? In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11-24). Dordecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
• Hofstadter, D. R., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.
• Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morisson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234-259). Oxford University Press.
• Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Huberman, M., Bitter, C., Anthony, J., & O'Day, J. (2014). The shape of deeper learning: Strategies, structures, and cultures in Deeper Learning Network High Schools. American Institutes for Research.
• Izglītības satura un eksamin‚cijas centrs [Curriculum Development and Examination Center]. (2008). Projekts "M‚cību satura izstr‚de un skolot‚ju t‚l‚kizglītība dabaszin‚ tÚu, matem‚tikas un tehnoloģiju priekšmetos. M‚cību saturs un prasības t‚ apguvei. Fizikaî [ESF National Programme Project "Production of education content and promoting teachers’ qualification in science, mathematics and technology. Learning content and requirements for it acquisition. Physicsî]. ISEC.
• James, M. C., & Scharmann, L. C. (2007). Using analogies to improve the teaching performance of preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 565-585.
• Jonāne, L. (2008). The didactical aspects of integrated natural science content model for secondary school education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 9(1), 45-57.
• Kim, Y. M., & Ruy, K. R. (2001). Effect of instruction using animation analogy on the middle school students' learning about electric current. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 38(6), 777-781.
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and instruction, 11, 357-380.
• Orgill, M. K. (2013). How effective is the use of analogies in science textbook? In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 79-99). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.) (2012). Education for life and work. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Pipere, A., & MiËule, I. (2014). Mathematical identity for a sustainable future: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 5-31. doi: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0001
• Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: Empirical studies. Physics Education Research, 3(020104), 1-16.
• Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Volume 1: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177-192.
• Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. (2010). Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030. gadam [Sustainable Development Strategy "Latvia 2030î]. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://www.pkc.gov.lv/images/LV2030/LIAS_2030_en.pdf
• Soobik, M. (2014). Teaching methods influencing the sustainability of the teaching process in technology education in general education schools. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 89-101. doi: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0005
• Sriram, K., Ganesh, L. S., & Mathumathi, R. (2013). Inferring principles for sustainable development of business through analogies from ecological systems. IIMB Management Review, 25(1), 36-48.
• Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers' analogical explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 227-242.
• Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for pre-service and in-service teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 85-101.
• Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., Venville, G. J., & Dagher, Z. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 213-229.
• UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). (2011). Learning for the future: Competences in Education for Sustainable Development. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://www.lne. be/themas/natuur-en-milieueducatie/algemeen/nmeinternationaal/ECE_CEP_ AC13_2011_6-20COMPETENCES-20EN.pdf
• Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). The role of analogies in promoting conceptual change in biology. Instructional Science, 24(4), 295-320.
• Vosniadou, S. (1988). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: A developmental perspective. Champaign, IL: Reading Research and Education Center.
• Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44-56.
• Wittrock, M. C., & Alesandrini, K. (1990). Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 489-502.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/jtes-2015-0011