On focus marking and predication. Evidence from Polish with some notes on Hausa

• Authors: Przemysław Tajsner
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose: The primary aim of the paper is to provide a new, derivational analysis of two types of Polish sentences with the occurrence of a particle to, which syntactically code focus and topic. These are: to-clefts (To Janek napisał list. ‘It was Janek who wrote the letter’), and topic-to sentences (Janek to napisał list. ‘As for Janek, he wrote the letter’). The secondary aim is to reflect on the relevance of the isomorphism of focus markers and non-verbal copulas in Polish with some reference to Hausa. Method: The approach follows a minimalist method but departs from cartographic accounts with dedicated heads in sentence left-periphery. Instead, it postulates that focus and topic are interpretive by-effects of Specification Predication. In this, the paper extends and modifies Kiss’s (2006, 2010) central idea that focusing is predication. Result & Conclusion: The account proves successful in explaining a few syntactic constraints, doing so in a simple, unitary fashion. Viewing focus as a derivative of predication is a step towards understanding the relation between narrow syntax and information structure.

Keywords

EN

focus; predication; topic; derivation; cartography

• Publisher: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk
• Journal: Lingua Posnaniensis
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 57
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 113-138

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2016-06-29

Contributors

author

Przemysław Tajsner

• Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

References

• Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33. 238-266.
• Bailyn, John. 2001. On scrambling: A reply to Boskovic and Takahashi. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 635-658.
• Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Rizzi, Luigi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 2, 16-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Boeckx, Cedric. 2006. Linguistic minimalism: origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Boeckx, Cedric & Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (eds.). 2003. Multiple WH-fronting. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Bondaruk, Anna. 2010. To as averb or as a pronoun: The case of Polish copular constructions. In Cyran, Eugeniusz & Szymanek, Bogdan (eds.), Verb structures: Between phonology and morphosyntax, 53-73. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
• Bondaruk, Anna. 2013. Copular clauses in English and Polish. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
• Borsley, Robert & R ivero, Maria-Luisa. 1994. Clitic auxiliaries and incorporation in Polish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 373-423.
• Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 351-383
• Bošković, Željko. 2004. Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion, and scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 613-638.
• Bošković, Željko & Takahashi, Daiko. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 347-366.
• Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591-656.
• Bowers, John. 2003. Predication. In Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Blackwell Reference Online. 12 May 2007.
• Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47. 257-281.
• Büring, Daniel. 2006. Focus projection and default prominence. In Molnar, Valéria & W inkler, Susanne (eds.), The architecture of focus, 321-346. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
• Bury, Dirk. 2003. Phrase structure and derived heads. London: University College London. (Doctoral dissertation.)
• Bury, Dirk. 2007. Verb movement and VSO-VOS alternations. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 77-91.
• Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure, Vol. 3, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Sauerland, Uli & Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.), Interfaces+Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from semantics, 1-29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert & Otero, Carlos P. & Z ubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, 133-166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33-49.
• Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 239-297.
• Citko, Barbara. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118. 261-295.[Crossref]
• Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move and labels. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Wh- movement: Moving on, 21-46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1993. A grammar of Mupun. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
• Frampton, John & Gutmann, Sam. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In Epstein, Samuel David & Seely, T. Daniel (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 90-105. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
• Frege, Gottlob. 1891. Function and concept. In Geach, Peter & Black, Max (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of G. Frege. 1980 edn. 21-41. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Concept and object. In Geach, Peter & Black, Max (eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of G. Frege. 1980 edn. 42-55. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Green, Melanie. 2007. Focus in Hausa. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Hinzen, Wolfram. 2008. Prospects for an explanatory theory of semantics. Biolinguistics 2(4). 348-363.
• Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
• Huber, Christian. 1999. Issues in syntax and interpretation of Sumerian clauses. In Proceedings of Workshop on diachronic and synchronic variations in the phonology, morphology, and syntax of Sumerian. Oxford: Oriental Institute.
• Huber, Stefan. 2000. Es-Clefts und det-Clefts. Zur Syntax, Semantik und Informations- struktur von Spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Schwedischen. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International.
• Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kiss, Katalin É. 2003. Argument scrambling, operator movement and topic movement in Hungarian. In Simin, Karimi (ed.), Word order and scrambling, 22-43. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Kiss, Katalin É. 2006. Focusing as predication. In Molnár, Valéria & W inkler, Susanne (eds.), The architecture of focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Kiss, Katalin É. 2010. Structural focus and exhaustivity. In Zimmermann, Malte & Féry, Caroline (eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological and experimental perspectives, 64-88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. The flexible nature of verb movement. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
• Kosta, Peter & Franks, Steven L. & R adeva-Bork, Teodora & Schurcks, Lilia (eds.). 2014. Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Féry, Caroline & Fanselow, Gisbert & Krifka, Manfred (eds.), Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure(ISIS) 6. 13-56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
• Lechner, Winfried. 2005. Interpretive effects of head-movement. Ms. University of Tübingen (lingBuzz/000178).
• Li, Charles N. N. & Thompson, Sandra. A. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, Charles N. N. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Subject and topic, 457-461. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. In Simin, Karimi (ed.), Word order and scrambling, 177-200. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Mokrosz, Ewelina. 2014. Exhaustive to and infinitives in Polish. Paper presented at 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Poznań 2014.
• Moro, Andrea. 2008. The Boundaries of Babel. The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Murakami, Madoka. 2011. Verb movement: The contrast between English and Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47. 569-583.
• Nagaya, Naonori. 2007. Information structure and constituent order in Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 8(1). 343-372.
• Paris, Marie-Claude. 1998. Focus operators and types of predication in Mandarin. Cahiers de linguistique - Asie Orientale 27(2). 139-159.
• Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers. Utrecht University.
• Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Focus: The PF interface. In Reinhart, Tanya. (ed.), Interface strategies. Reference-set computation, 125-164. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 3, 223-251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Wh movement: Moving on, 97-134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the Minimalist Program. In Boeckx, Cedric, The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism, 195-219. Oxford: OUP.
• Rothstein, Susan. 1983. The syntactic forms of predication. Cambridge, MA: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
• Rothstein, Susan. 2006. Predication. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. Second edition, Vol. 10, 73-76. Oxford: Elsevier.
• Rutkowski, Paweł. 2006. From demonstratives to copulas: A cross-linguistic perspective and the case of Polish. Journal of Universal Language 7. 147-173.
• Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1. 69-119.
• Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax. the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The Handbook of phonological theory, 550-569. London: Blackwell.
• Surányi, Balázs. 2005. Head movement and reprojection. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae. Sectio Linguistica. Tomus XXVI. 313-342.
• Surányi, Balázs. 2008. Cyclic spell out and reprojection in head movement. In Hartmann, Jutta & Hegedűs, Veronika & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 293-337. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Szczegielniak, Adam. 1997. Deficient heads and long head movement in Slovak. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 5. 312-333.
• Tajsner, Przemysław. 2008. Aspects of the grammar of focus: A minimalist view. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Tajsner, Przemysław. 2015. On specification and the derivation of copular to-clauses in Polish. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 50(4). 25-66.
• Tajsner, Przemysław & Cegłowski, Piotr. 2006. Topicalization and object fronting in Polish: A view from a minimalist perspective. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna (ed.), IFAtuation: A life in IFA. A Festschrift for professor Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of His 70th birthday, 99-131. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Wedgwood, Dan. 2003. Predication and information structure. A dynamic account of the Hungarian pre-verbal system. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. (Doctoral dissertation.)
• Wedgwood, Dan. 2006. Predication, focus, and the positions of negation in Hungarian. Lingua 116. 351-376.
• Wiland, Bartosz. 2008. Circumstantial evidence for syntactic head movement. In Abner, Natasha & Bishop, Jason (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 440-448. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
• Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203-238.
• Williams, Edwin. 1987. NP trace and theta-theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 10. 203-238.
• Witkoś, Jacek. 2007. Polish and the A-type scrambling. In Kosta, Peter & Schürcks, Lilia. (eds.), Linguistic investigations into formal description of Slavic languages, 165-180. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Wolff, H. Ekkehard, & Löhr, Doris. 2006. Encoding focus in Kanuri verbal morphology: Predication focus and the ‘Kanuri focus shift’. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 46. 185-209.
• Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 2005. Phrasal stress, focus, and syntax. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The syntax companion. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/linpo-2015-0006