Indo-Aryan ergativity and its analogues in languages of Central and Western Eurasia

• Authors: Boris Zakharyin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Boris Zakharyin. Indo-Aryan ergativity and its analogues in languages of Central and Western Eurasia. The Poznań Society for the Advancement of Arts and Sciences, PL ISSN 0079-4740, pp. 63-75 Ergativity, being a typologically significant feature, serves as basis for a bunch of genetically and structurally different languages of Eurasia. The paper suggests the bird’s eye view of its manifestation in the selected samples of Indo-Iranian, Tibeto-Burman, Caucasian and Euskara (the Basque language of Spain). The provided analysis allows to assume that split ergativity displayed by certain Indo-Iranian languages is of the same (participial) origin and partially may have also been influenced by contact-factors. Consistent ergativity characterizing the majority of the Caucasian languages and Euskara is a phenomenon of semo-syntactic nature realizing itself on all the grammatical levels.

Keywords

EN

ergativity; Eurasia; Indo-Iranian; Tibeto-Burman; Burushaski; Caucasian; Euskara; semosyntactic

• Publisher: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk
• Journal: Lingua Posnaniensis
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 57
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 63-76

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2016-06-29

Contributors

author

Boris Zakharyin

• Moscow State University

References

• Anderson, Stephen R. 1976. On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic, 1-23. New York.
• Bossong, Georg. 1984. Ergativity in Basque. Linguistics 23. 341-392.
• Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Lehmann, Winfred P. (ed.), Syntactic Typology, 329-395. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fussman, Gerard. 1972. Atlas linguistique des parlers dardes et kafirs. 2 vols. Paris: École Française d’Extrême Orient.
• Itziar Laka 1996 = Brief grammar of Euskara. The Basque Language, ‘Brief_grammar_euskara’ (pdf).
• Khokhlova, Ludmila V. 2001. Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001. Papers from the International Symposium on South Asian Languages: Contact, Convergence and Typology, 159-184. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Kibrik, A.E. 1992. Ocherki po obschim i prikladnym voprosam jazykoznanija (Essays on the general and applied problems of linguistics). Moscow: Moscow State University.
• Klimov, G.A. 1983. Printsipy kontensivnoj tipologii (Principles of the contensive typology). Moscow: Nauka.
• Koshal, Sanyukta. 1979. Ladakhi Grammar. Delhi-Varanasi-Patna: Motilal Banarsidass.
• Koul, Omkar N. & H ook, P.E. (eds.). 1984. Aspects of Kashmiri Linguistics. New Delhi: Bahri Publications.
• Liperovsky, Vladimir P. 2007. Notes on the marking of actants in Braj (in comparison with Modern Standard Hindi). In Masica, Colin P. (ed.), Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics, 144-152. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
• Liperovsky, Vladimir P. 2011. Ocherk grammatiki sovremennogo braja (Grammatical Sketch of Modern Braj). Moscow: Nauka.
• Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity, Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
• Meschaninov, Ivan I. 1967. Ergativnaya konstruktsiya v yazykakh razlichnykh tipov (Ergative Construction in Different Types Languages). Leningrad: Nauka.
• Montaut, Annie. 2004. A Grammar of Hindi. Lincom-Europa: Lincom GmbH.
• Strand, R.F. 1973. Notes on the Nūristāni and Dardic languages. Journal of the American Oriental Society 93(3).[Crossref]
• Stroński, Krzysztof. 2011. Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Zakharyin, Boris A. 1987. Tipologija jazykov Juzhnoj Azii (The Typology of the Languages of South Asia). Moscow: Moscow State University.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/linpo-2015-0012