Multi-Sensory Learning Strategies to Support Spelling Development: a Case Study of Second-Language Learners with Auditory Processing Difficulties

• Authors: Annalene van Staden , Nicole Purcell
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Research confirms the multifaceted nature of spelling development and emphasizes the importance of both cognitive and linguistic skills (such as working and long-term memory, phonological processing, rapid automatized naming, orthographic awareness, mental orthographic images, semantic knowledge and morphological awareness) that affect spelling development. This has clear implications for many second-language spellers (L2) with auditory processing difficulties because writing systems are graphic representations of spoken language, and literacy development involves learning the association between the printed and oral forms of language (also known as phonological awareness and processing). In the present investigation, the researchers sampled second-language spellers (n = 22) with significant auditory processing delays and implemented an intervention programme that utilized visual and tactile coding strategies as part of the multi-sensory intervention therapy programme (for a period of six months). Post-test results were very promising and showed that L2 English-language spellers significantly improved in both short-term memory processing, phonological awareness and spelling performances. Considering this investigation’s contribution to effectively supporting the spelling development of children with auditory processing delays, the researchers are confident that it will expand and improve existing theoretical accounts of literacy (and spelling) acquisition in the field of psycholinguistics, whilst also facilitating the academic success of the growing L2 learner population in South Africa (and internationally).

Keywords

EN

English second-language spellers; auditory-processing difficulties; short-term memory; phonological awareness; visual and tactile coding; multi-sensory learning strategies

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Journal on Language, Literature and Culture in Education
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 40-61

Dates

published

2016-06-01

online

2016-07-06

Contributors

author

Annalene van Staden

• Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State, South Africa

author

Nicole Purcell

• University of the Free State, South Africa

References

• Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Reid, M., & Merzenich, M.M. (2000). Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. PNAS, 97(12), 6832-6837.[Crossref]
• Alptekin, C. Özemir,O., & Çereti, G. (2014). Effects of variations in reading span task design on the relationship between working memory capacity and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 536-552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12089.[Crossref]
• Arfe, B., Rossi, C., & Sicoli, S. (2015). The contribution of verbal working memory to deaf children’s oral and written production. Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2014, 1-12. doi:10.1093/deafed/env005[Crossref]
• Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 1-6.
• Baschera, G. M. (2011). Modeling and evaluation of computer assisted spelling learning in dyslexic children. Unpublished PhD Thesis, ETH, Zurich.
• Basso Garcia, B. R., Mammarella, I. C., Tripodi, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Visuospacial working memory for locations, colours, and binding in typically developing children and in children with dyslexia and non-verbal learning disability. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 17-33.[Crossref]
• Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flowers’ model of skilled writing to explain developing writing. In E. C. Butterfield (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice. Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 1-30). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Bourke, L., Davies, S. J., Summer, E., & Green, C. (2013). Individual differences in the development of early writing skills: testing the unique contribution of visuospatial working memory. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(2), 315-335.
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2009). Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(8), 724-751.[Crossref]
• Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R.I. (2000). Theorizing about the relation between American Sign language and reading. In C. Chamberlain, J. Morford & R. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 221-59). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Darch, C., Kim, S., Johnson, S., & James, H. (2000). The strategic spelling skills of students with learning disabilities: The results of two studies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(1), 15-26.
• De Sousa, D. S., & Broom, Y. (2011). Learning to read in English: Comparing monolingual English and bilingual Zulu-English Grade 3 learners. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 1(1), 1-18.
• Dubitsky, J. (2014). An investigation to evaluate the benefits of the integrated listening systems (Ils) in primary/early elementary classrooms (kindergarten-third grade): The case of Valley View Academy in Northern California. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, California.
• Ehri, L. C., (2005). Development of sight word reading: phases and findings. In: M.J.H. Snowling (Ed.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 135-145). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Emmorey, K., & J. A. Petrich (2012). Processing orthographic structure: Associations between print and fingerspelling. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(2), 194-204. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr051.[Crossref]
• Fox, E. (1994). Grapheme-phoneme correspondence in dyslexic and matched control readers. British Journal of Psychology, 85(1), 41-53. Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic books.[Crossref]
• Gerton, B. K., Brown, T. T., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Kohn, P., Holt, J. C., & Olsen, R. K. (2004). Shared and distinct neurophysiological components of the digits forward and backward task as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1781-1787.[Crossref]
• Grant, A., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E. (2011). Reading in English as a first or second language: The case of Grade 3 Spanish, Portuguese, and English speakers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 67-83.
• Hahn, N., Foxe, J. J., & Molholm, S. (2014). Impairments of multisensory integration and cross-sensory learning as pathways to dyslexia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 384-392.[Crossref]
• Haptonstall-Nykaza, T. S., & Schick, B. (2007). The Transition from Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(2), 172-83.[Crossref]
• IBM CORPORATION. 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, New York.
• Iliadou, V., Bamiou, D. E., Kaprinis, S., & Kandylis, G. (2009). Auditory processing disorders in children suspected of learning disabilities - A need for screening? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73(7), 1029-1034.[Crossref]
• Jansen, L. (2013). SA’s shocking literacy stats. Durban. IOL News. Retrieved from: http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/sa-s-shocking-literacy-stats-1.1595411#.Vb_E7fOqqko
• Jerger, J., & Musiek, F. (2000). Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 11(2), 467-474.
• Johnson, R. E. (1994). Possible influences on bilingualism in early ASL acquisition. Teaching English to Deaf and Second-Language Students, 10(2), 9-17.
• Jongejan, W., Verhoefen, L., & Siegel, L.S. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 835-851.[Crossref]
• Keogh, K., & Pearson, J. (2014). The sensory strength of voluntary visual imagery predicts visual working memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 1-13.[Crossref]
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & Castles, A. (2009). Assessing spelling skills and strategies: A critique of available resources. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14(1), 113-150.
• Lehmann, S., & Murray, M.M. (2005). The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(2), 326-334.
• Listen & Learn Centre (2010). Auditory processing disorder and reading difficulties. Retrieved from: www.listenandlearn.com.au
• Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1-15.[Crossref]
• Maerlender, A. (2010). Short‐term memory and auditory processing disorders: Concurrent validity and clinical diagnostic markers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(10), 975-984.
• Malstädt, N., Hasselhorn, M., & Lehmann, M. (2012). Free recall behaviour in children with and without spelling impairment: The impact of working memory sub capacities. Dyslexia, 18, 187-198.[Crossref]
• Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A.A., & Lieberman, A.M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in Deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16(2), 164-88.[Crossref]
• Miller, C. A., & Wagstaff, D. A. (2011). Behavioral profiles associated with auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment. Journal of communication disorders, 44(6), 745-763.
• Ouimet, T., & Balaban, E. (2009). Auditory stream biasing in children with reading impairments. Dyslexia, 16, 45-65.[Crossref]
• Padden, C.A. (2006). Learning to fingerspell twice: Young signing children’s acquisition of fingerspelling. In B. Schick, M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Advances in the Sign Language Development of Deaf Children (pp. 189-201). New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0.[Crossref]
• Peters, M. L. (2013). Spelling: caught or taught?: a new look. London: Routledge.
• Pietersen, J., & Maree, K. (2007). Overview of statistical techniques. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (pp. 225-252). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
• Puente, A., J., Alvarado, M., & Herrera, V. (2006). Fingerspelling and sign language as alternative codes for reading and writing words for Chilean deaf signers. American Annals of the Deaf, 151(3), 299-310.[Crossref]
• Rapcsak, S.Z., Henry, M.S., Teague, S.L., Carnahan, S.D., & Beeson, P.M. (2007). Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia? Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2519-2524.[Crossref]
• Rosen, S. (1999). Language Disorders: A problem with auditory processing? Current Biology, 9(18), R698-R700.[Crossref]
• RSA DBE (2014). Republic of South Africa Department of Basic Education. 2014. Report on the annual national assessment of 2014 grades 1-6 & 9. Pretoria: Government Printer.
• Sharma, M., Purdy, S.C., & Kelly, A.S. (2009). Comorbidity of Auditory Processing, language, and Reading Disorders. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 706-722.[Crossref]
• Simonsen, F., & Gunter, L. (2001). Best practices in spelling instruction: A research summary. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 97-105.
• Stredler-Brown, A., & Johnson, C.D. (2004). Functional auditory performance indicators: An integrated approach to auditory skill development (3rd Ed.). Retrieved from: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/download/pdf/FAPI_3-1-04g.pdf
• Van Berkel, A. (2004). Learning to spell in English as a second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics for Language Teaching, 42, 239-257.
• Van Staden, A. (2010). Improving the spelling ability of Grade 3 learners through visual imaging teaching strategies. Per Linguam, 26(1), 13-28.
• Wang, M., & Geva, E. (2003). Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 1-25.[Crossref]
• Williams, J.T., & Newman, S.D. (2016). Connections between fingerspelling and print: The impact of working memory and temporal dynamics on lexical activation. Sign Language Studies, 16(2), 157-18.
• Wolter, J.A., Self, T., & Apel, K. (2011). Initial mental graphemic representation acquisition and later literacy achievement in children with language impairment: a longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 543-555. [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/llce-2016-0003