Maternity and Absence in Shakespearean Romance

• Authors: Helen Hopkins
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The equivocation of the private life of Elizabethan and Jacobean subjects with the public life of monarchy and state endowed mothers with an import, and therefore a power, not previously acknowledged. These changes provoked a fear of female disruption to patriarchal structures which found its way onto Shakespeare’s stage by the representation of mothers as ‘unnatural’ agents of chaos, associated with witchcraft, murder, dangerous ambition, and infidelity; if not by complete absence, which “posits the sacrifice of the mother’s desire as the basis of the ideal society” (Rose, 1991: 313). I suggest that in the late romances, specifically The Winter's Tale and The Tempest, Shakespeare found a form that could demonstrate the complexity of the mother’s position, while still resolving the action with a satisfactory ending that presented a stable continuation of patriarchal lineage. The fathers rely on a fantasy of parthenogenesis to relocate the role of the mother in themselves, ensuring the children are free from her corruptive influence and the bloodlines are safe. However, as all themes return to maternity - chastity, fertility, lineage for example - the fantasy of eradicating the mother is shown to be limited even in the artificial realm of the romance.

Keywords

EN

Shakespeare; romance; gender; maternity; patriarchy; parthenogenesis; The Tempest; The Winter’s Tale.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Messages, Sages and Ages
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 17-27

Dates

published

2016-08-01

online

2016-08-04

Contributors

author

Helen Hopkins

• Institute of Humanities and Creative Arts University of Worcester Henwick Grove, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK

References

• Adelman, J. 1999. “Masculine Authority and the Maternal Body: The Return to Origins in Cymbeline.” In: Ryan, K. (ed.), Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Addison Wesley: Longman. 107-133.
• Belsey, C. 1985. The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London: Routledge. Bevington, D. M. 1996. “The Domineering Female in 1 Henry VI.” Shakespeare Studies vol. 2. 51-58.
• Callaghan, D. 2000. Shakespeare Without Women: Representing Gender and Race on the Renaissance Stage. London: Routledge.
• Dunworth, F. 2012. Mothers and Meaning on the Early Modern English Stage. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Felperin, H. 1999. “‘Tongue-tied, Our Queen?’: The Deconstruction of Presence in The Winter’s Tale.” In: Ryan, K. (ed.), Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Addison Wesley: Longman. 187-205.
• Hackett, H. 1999. “‘Gracious be the Issue’: Maternity and Narrative in Shakespeare’s Last Plays.” In: Knowles, J. R. (ed.). Shakespeare’s Late Plays: New Readings. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 25-39.
• Kahn, C. 1980. “The Providential Tempest and the Shakespearean Family.” In: Kahn, M. M. (ed.),Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays. London: John Hopkins Press. 217-243.
• McEachern, C. 1996. The Poetics of English Nationhood 1590-1612. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Neely, C. T. 1999. “The Winter's Tale: Women and Issue.” In: Ryan, K. (ed.), Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Addison Wesley: Longman. 169-188.
• Orgel, S. 1986. “Prospero's Wife.” In: Ferguson, M. W., Quilligan M., and Vickers, N. J. (eds.), Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 50-64.
• Park, K. 2006. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books.
• Penuel, S. 2007. “Male Mothering and The Tempest.” In: Moncrief, K. M. and McPherson, K. R. (eds.), Performing Maternity in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate. 115-127.
• Rose, M. B. 1991. “Where are the Mothers in Shakespeare? Options for Gender Representation in the English Renaissance.” Shakespeare Quarterly vol. 42, no. 3. 291-314.
• Shakespeare, W. 1954. The Tempest. Ed. Frank Kermode. London: Methuen/Routledge.
• Shakespeare, W. 1996. The Winter’s Tale. Ed. Stephen Orgel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, K. M. 2007. “Martial Maids and Murdering Mothers: Women, Witchcraft and Motherly Transgression in Henry VI and Richard III.” Shakespeare Yearbook vol. 3. 143-160.
• Stimpson, C. R. 1991. “Forword.” In: Newman, K. (ed.), Fashioning Femininity and English Renaissance Drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. xi-xiv.
• Tennenhouse, L. 1999. “Family Rites: Patriarchal Strategies in Shakespearean Romance.” In: Ryan, K. (ed.), Shakespeare: The Last Plays. Addison Wesley: Longman. 43-60.
• Thompson, A. 1995. “‘Miranda, Where's Your Sister?’ Reading Shakespeare’s The Tempest.” In: Kamps, D. E. (ed.), Shakespeare and Gender: A History. London: Verso. 168-177.
• Traub, V. 1995. “Jewels, Statues, and Corpses: Containment of Female Erotic Power in Shakespeare’s Plays.” In: Kamps, D. E. (ed.), Shakespeare and Gender: A History. London: Verso. 120-141.
• Wilcox, H. 1994. “Gender and Genre in Shakespeare’s Tragicomedies.” In: Hoenselaars, A. J. (ed.), Reclamations of Shakespeare. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press. 129-138.
• Wilson, R. 1994. “Observations on English Bodies: Licensing Maternity in Shakespeare’s Late Plays.” In: Burt, R. and Archer, J. M. (eds.), Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property and Culture in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 121-150.
• Woodford, D. C. 2007. “Nursing and influence in Pandosto and The Winter’s Tale.” Moncrief, K. M. and McPherson, K. R. (eds.), Performing Maternity in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate. 183-196.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/msas-2016-0002