Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)

• Authors: František Ochrana , Kristýna Hrnčířová
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Through the institute of public procurement a considerable volume of financial resources is allocated. It is therefore in the interest of contracting entities to seek ways of how to achieve an efficient allocation of resources. Some public contract-awarding entities, along with some public-administration authorities in the Czech Republic, believe that the use of a single evaluation criterion (the lowest bid price) results in a more efficient tender for a public contract. It was found that contracting entities in the Czech Republic strongly prefer to use the lowest bid price criterion. Within the examined sample, 86.5 % of public procurements were evaluated this way. The analysis of the examined sample of public contracts proved that the choice of an evaluation criterion, even the preference of the lowest bid price criterion, does not have any obvious impact on the final cost of a public contract. The study concludes that it is inappropriate to prefer the criterion of the lowest bid price within the evaluation of public contracts that are characterised by their complexity (including public contracts for construction works and public service contracts). The findings of the Supreme Audit Office related to the inspection of public contracts indicate that when using the lowest bid price as an evaluation criterion, a public contract may indeed be tendered with the lowest bid price, but not necessarily the best offer in terms of supplied quality. It is therefore not appropriate to use the lowest bid price evaluation criterion to such an extent for the purpose of evaluating work and services. Any improvement to this situation requires a corresponding amendment to the Law on Public Contracts and mainly a radical change in the attitude of the Office for the Protection of Competition towards proposed changes, as indicated within the conclusions and recommendations proposed by this study.

Keywords

EN

Public procurement; criteria for evaluation of public contracts; estimated price of a public contract; final price of a public contract; impact of the lowest bid price criterion on the final price of a public contract; the lowest bid price; principle of economy

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 41-59

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2015-07-27

Contributors

author

František Ochrana

• Center for Social and Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague.

author

Kristýna Hrnčířová

• Center for Social and Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague.

References

• Arrow, K. 1971. Essays on the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Amsterdam-London: North-Holland.
• CSO. 2014. Czech Statistical Office. Available at (last accessed February 15, 2015).
• Iimi, A. 2006. “Auction Reforms for Effective Official Development Assistance.” Review of Industrial Organization 28(2), 109 – 128.[Crossref]
• Jurčík, R. 2007. “The Economic Impact of the EC Procurement Policy.” Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska ekonomika 7, 333 – 337.
• Kameník, M. (ed.), P. Nikolovová, J. Palguta, F. Pertold, J. Soudek, M. Vozár, K. Andrlová and P. Prchal. 2011. Otevřenost zadávacích řízení v ČR. Praha: Oživení, o.s.
• Meričková, B., J. Nemec, E. Sičáková Beblavá and M. Beblavý. 2010. Kontrahovanie služieb vo verejnom sektore. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovensko.
• Meričková Mikušová, B. and J. Stejskal. 2014. “Hodnota statku kolektivní spotřeby.” Politická ekonomie 62(2), 216 – 231.
• Mikušová Meričková, B., Nemec, J. 2013. “Contract Management and its Impact on contracting Public Services: Slovak Republic.” Ekonomický časopis, 61(7), 690 – 699.
• MMR. 2014. Výroční zpráva o stavu veřejných zakázek v České republice za rok 2013 [Annual report on the state of public procurement in the Czech Republic in 2013]. Prague: Ministry of Regional Development.
• Nemec, J. 2012. “Zmluvné zabezpečovanie verejných služieb.” Ekonomický časopis 50(6), 9 – 11.
• Nemec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and M. Grega. 2014. “Contracting, Outsourcing, Procurement: Selected Factors Limiting their Success in the CEE Region.” 18th IRSPM Conference, 9 – 11 April, Carleton University. Ottawa, Canada. Available at (last accessed October 15, 2014).
• Nemec, J., B. Mikušová Meričková and Z. Vozárová. 2013. “Management of Contracting Public Services and its Quality in Slovakia.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 5(1), 55 – 74.
• Neumann, J. von and O. Morgernstern. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Nikolovová, P., J. Palguta, F. Pertold and M. Vozár. 2012. Veřejné zakázky v ČR. Co říkají data o chování zadavatelů? Praha: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.
• OECD. 2003. Transparency in Government Procurement: The Benefit of Efficient Governance and Orientations for Achieving It. Paris: OECD.
• Pavel, J. 2014. “Factors Affecting the Value of Compliance Costs of Public Procurement.” 19th international expert conference “Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance”, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 11 – 12 April 2014. In Sedmihradská, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the 19thInternational Conference Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2014. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 222 – 227.
• Pavel, J. and R. Kubík. 2011. “Faktory ovlivňující intenzitu konkurenčního efektu při zadávání veřejných zakázek na stavební práce v ČR.” In Kubátová, K. (ed.). Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance. Praha: Oeconomia, 3 – 10.
• Pavel, J. and E. Sičáková Beblavá. 2008. “Transparentnosť trhu verejného obstarávania.” Ekonomický časopis 56(2), 168 – 181.
• Prager, J. 1994. “Contracting out Government Services. Lessons from the Private Sector.” Public Administration Review 54, 176 – 184.[Crossref]
• Půček, M. and F. Ochrana. 2014. “Theory and Practice of the Public Sector Savings: The Case of Czech Regions.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 42E, 203 – 224.
• Sičáková Beblavá, E. and M. Beblavý. 2009. “Rozhodovanie slovenských miest o postupoch obstarávania verejných služieb.” Ekonomický časopis 57(7), 667 – 681.
• Soukopová, J. and I. Malý. 2013. “Competitive Evironment in Waste Management and its Impact on Municipal Expenditures.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(4), 173 – 183.
• Strand, I., P. Ramada, E. Canton et al. 2011. Public Procurement in Europe. Cost and Effectiveness (Prepared for the European Commission, March 2011). London: PwC, London Economics and Ecorys.
• Vlček P. 2004. “K problematike hodnotenia efektívnosti zabezpečovania verejných služieb na báze syntetického ukazovateľa.” Ekonomika a spoločnosť 5(1), 74 – 81.
• Vozárová, Z. 2012. Kontrahovanie služeb vo veřejném sektore. [Contracting of Services in the Public Sector]. Dissertation thesis. Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banském Bystrici. Economic Faculty.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/nispa-2015-0003