The birth of the adjective class as a problem of translation

• Authors: Luca Alfieri
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper seeks to analyze the translation of grammatical terminology. One of the main differences between the Greek-Latin parts of speech theory and that of traditional later European linguistics (from Port Royal onwards) lies in the existence of the adjective as an independent word class. The paper examines the definitions of the categories of noun, verb and epithet/adjective from Dionysius Thrax through the 17th century, with the aim of showing that the birth of the adjective as an independent word class, along with the stabilization of the labels nomen substantivum and adjectivum with reference to the common noun and the adjective, hides a problem in meta-semiotic translation. Specifically, the issue concerns the translationreinterpretation of Aristotle’s metaphysics in light of Neo-platonic ontology during the Middle Ages, as well as its influence on the reinterpretation-translation of the Greek-Latin parts of speech theory between Late Antiquity and the Renaissance.

Keywords

EN

history of linguistic thought; history of parts of speech theory; ancient grammatical theories

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Open Linguistics
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1

Dates

received

2015-02-20

accepted

2015-02-27

online

2015-04-30

Contributors

author

Luca Alfieri

• Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

References

• Alfieri, Luca. 2006. Genesi e storia della denominazione nomen substantīvum. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, s. IX, v. XVII, f. 1, pp. 75–104.
• Alfieri, Luca. 2014. The birth of a grammatical category: the case of the adjective class. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 52.1, pp. 141–175.
• Arens, Hans. 1980. ‘Verbum cordis’: Zur Sprachphilosophie des Mittelalters. In Koerner, Konrad E.F. (ed.), Studies in medieval linguistic thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 13–28.
• Arens, Hans. 1984. Aristotele’s theory of language and its tradition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Arnauld, Antoine and Claude Lancelot. 1660. Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris: Pierre le Petit. [Page numbers refer to the edition Paris: Prault, 1754].
• Auroux, Sylvain. 1988. La grammaire générale et les fondements philosophiques des classements des mots. Langages 92, pp. 79–91.
• Ax, Wolfram. 1986. Laut, Stimme und Sprache. Studien zu drei Grundbegriffe der antichen Sprachtehorie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Ax, Wolfram. 1991. Sprache als Gegenstand der alexandrinischen und pergamenischen Philologie. In Schmitter, Peter (ed.), Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 275–301.
• Belardi, Walter. 1975. Il linguaggio nella filosofia di Aristotele. Roma: K Editrice.
• Belardi, Walter. 1985. Filosofia grammatica e retorica nel pensiero antico. Roma: Il Calamo.
• Belardi, Walter. 1990. Aspetti del linguaggio e della lingua nel pensiero degli Stoici. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, classe di scienze morali, s. 9, v. 1, pp. 1–25, 91–207.
• Blank, David and Catherine Atherton. 2003. The Stoic contribution to traditional grammar. In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–27.
• Brandenburg, Philipp. 2005. Apollonios Dyskolos über das Pronomen. Einführung, Text Übersetzung und Erklärung. Leipzig: Sauer.
• Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. 1971. Speculative Grammar of the Middle Age. Paris: Mouton.
• Busse, Adolphus (ed.). 1897. Ammonius Hermiae in Aristotelis “Perì Hermeneias” Commentarius. Commentaria in Aristotelem Greca, Vol. IV.5. Berolini: Reimer.
• de Rijk, Lambertus M. 1981. Die Wirkung der neuplatonischen Semantik auf das mittelalterliche Denken über das Sein. In Beckmann, Jan (ed.), Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 19–35.
• Di Benedetto, Vincenzo. 1958–1959. Dioniso Trace e la techne a lui attribuita. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Serie 2, n. 27, pp. 169–210; n. 28, pp. 87–118.
• Di Benedetto, Vincenzo. 1973. La Techne spuria. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Serie 3, n. 3, pp. 797–814.
• Di Benedetto, Vincenzo. 1999. At the origin of Greek grammar. Glotta 68, pp. 19–39.
• Di Benedetto, Vincenzo. 2000. Dionysius Thrax and the Tékhnē Grammatikḗ. In Auroux, Sylvain et al. (eds.), History of the Language Science. An International Handbook of the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginning to the Present. 1st vol. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 394–400.
• Dickey, Eleanor. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fredborg, Karin M. 1980. Universal grammar according to some 12th-century grammarians. In Koerner, Konrad E. F. (ed.), Studies in medieval linguistic thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 69–84.
• Geyer, Bernhard (ed.). 1919. Peter Abelards Philosophische Schriften. Münster: Aschendorff.
• GG = Uhlig, Gustav et al. (ed.). 1883–1901 [repr. 1965–1990]. Grammatici Graeci. Hildesheim: Olms.
• GL = Keil, Heinrich et al. (ed.). 1855–1880 [repr. 1961–81]. Grammatici Latini. Hildesheim: Olms.
• Gusmani, Roberto. 2004. Su una recente interpretazione della teoria aristotelica del linguaggio. Incontri Linguistici 27, pp. 149–69.
• Gusmani, Roberto. 2005. L’argomento linguistico nel libro gamma della Metafisica di Aristotele. Incontri Linguistici 28, pp. 169–82.
• Hockett, Charles F. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 10, pp. 210–34.
• Hunt, Richard W. 1980. Collected Papers on the History of Grammar in the Middle Ages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Iovino, Rossella. 2012. La sintassi dei modificatori nominali in latino. Müchen, Lincolm Europa.
• Jolivet, Jean. 1981. Rapports entre la grammaire et l’ontologie au Moyen Âge. In Beckmann, Jan (ed.), Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 135–164.
• Lallot, Jean. 1988. Origines et développement de la théorie des parties du discours en Grèce. Langages 23, issue 92, pp. 11–23.
• Lallot, Jean. 1992. L’adjectif dans la tradition grammaticale grecque. Histoire, Épistémologie, Langage 14, pp. 25–35.
• Lallot, Jean. 1998. [2nd ed.]. La grammaire de Denys le Thrace. Traduite et annotée. Paris: CNRS Éditions
• Lallot, Jean. 1999. Strates chronologiques dans le lexique technique des grammairiens grecs. L’exemple des noms des parties du discours. Mémoire de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, N.S. 6, pp. 51–66.
• Luhtala, Anneli. 2005. Grammar and Philosophy in Late Antiqity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Maierù, Alfonso. 1972. Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
• Matthaios, Stephanos. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
• Melanchthon, Philip. 1533. Grammatica graeca. Haganoae: Ioannes Secerius.
• Melanchthon, Philip. 1558. Grammatica latina. Augusta Vindelicorum: Weyssenhorn.
• Padley, George A. 1976. Grammatical theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Pattin, Adrien. 1971. Simplicius. Commentaire sur le Catégories d’Aristote, transl. by Guillaume de Moerbeke, 1st vol. Louvain & Paris: Publications universitaires.
• Pinborg, Jan. 1967. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster: Aschendorff.
• Ramus, Petrus. 1576 [15481]. Petri Rami grammatica latina. Aliquot in locis aucta et emendata. Frankfuhrt: Sebastianum Henriepetri.
• Robins, Robert H. 1957. Dionysus Thrax and the Western grammatical tradition. Transactions of the Philological Society 56, pp. 67–107. [Reprinted in Robins 1970: 113–54].
• Robins, Robert H. 1966. The development of the word class system of the European grammatical tradition. Foundation of language 2, pp. 3–19. [Reprinted in Robins 1970: 185–203].
• Robins, Robert H. 1970. Diversion of Bloomsbury. Selected writings in linguistics. Amsterdam & London: John Benjamins.
• Robins, Robert H. 1995. The Autenticity of the Techne. The status quaestionis. In Law, Vivien and Ineke Sluiter (eds.), Dionysius Thrax and the Technê Grammatikê. Münster: Nodus, pp. 13–26.
• Robins, Robert H. 1997. Storia della linguistica. Bologna: Il Mulino. [Italian transl. of A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longman, 1967].
• Sanctius, Franciscus B. 1587. Minerva seu de de causis linguae latinae. Salamanca: G. Scioppius.
• Sigier de Courtrai = Wallerand, Gaston (ed.). 1913. Les Œuvres de Sigier de Courtrai. Les Philosophes Belges. Louvain: Institut supérieur de philosophie de l’Université.
• Scaliger, Julius C. 1540. De causis linguae latinae. Lyon: S. Gryphius.
• Schenkeveld, Dirk M. 1993. Pap. Hamburg 128: A Hellenistic Ars Poetica. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 97, pp. 67–80.
• Swiggers, Pierre and Alfonse Wouters. 1996. Conent and Contest in (Translating) Ancient Grammars. In Swiggers P. and A. Wouter (eds.), Ancient Grammar: Content and Context. Leuven & Paris: Peeters, pp. 123–161.
• Swiggers, Pierre and Alfonse Wouters. 2011. Grammatical doxography in antiquity: The (hi)stories of the parts-of-speech systems. In Hasser, Gerda (ed.), History of Linguistics 2008. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 69–91.
• Thomas Aquinas = Fretté, Stanislaus E. and Paul Maré (eds.). 1872–1880. Thomas Aquinas. Opera Omnia. Paris: Ludovicum Vives.
• Thurot, Charles. 1868. Notices et Extrait des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque impériale et autres bibliothèques, vol. 22.2. Paris: Imprimeur Impérial.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/opli-2015-0007