God’s Power and Almightiness in Whitehead’s Thought

• Authors: Palmyre M.F. Oomen
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Whitehead’s position regarding God’s power is rather unique in the philosophical and theological landscape. Whitehead rejects divine omnipotence (unlike Aquinas), yet he claims (unlike Hans Jonas) that God’s persuasive power is required for everything to exist and to occur. This intriguing position is the subject of this article. The article starts with an exploration of Aquinas’ reasoning towards God’s omnipotence. This will be followed by a close examination of Whitehead’s own position, starting with an introduction to his philosophy of organism and its two-sided concept of God. Thereupon, an analysis of Whitehead’s idiosyncratic view on God’s agency will show that, according to this conception, God and the World depend upon each other, and that God’s agency is a non-coercive but persuasive power. The difference between coercion and persuasion will be explained as well as the reason why God, according to Whitehead’s conception, cannot possibly coerce. Finally, a discussion of the issue of divine almightiness will allow for a reinterpretation of divine almightiness from a Whiteheadian perspective, which will show how despite Whitehead’s rejection of God’s omnipotence, his concept retains essential elements of God as pantokrator (and thus markedly differs from Hans Jonas’ concept).

Keywords

EN

Alfred North Whitehead; Thomas Aquinas; Hans Jonas; God’s power; almightiness; omnipotence; pantokrator; God’s self-limitation; philosophy of organism; process thought; persuasion; coercion; God andWorld as opposites

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Open Theology
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1

Dates

received

2015-08-22

accepted

2015-08-31

online

2015-10-14

Contributors

author

Palmyre M.F. Oomen

• Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

References

• Arendt, Hannah. “What is Authority?” In Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin Books, 2006, 91-141 (org. 1954).
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae (1267-1273). Translations I have used: New English Translation of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae (Summa Theologica), by Alfred J. Freddoso (http://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/TOC-part1.htm); The Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Benziger Bross, edition 1947); and Summa Theologiae: Latin text and English translation, edited by Blackfriars, London/New York, 1967-1975.
• Basinger, David. “Human Coercion: A Fly in the Process Ointment?” Process Studies 15/3 (1986): 161-171. [Crossref]
• Basinger, David. “Divine Power: Do Process Theists Have a Better Idea?” In Process Theology, edited by R. Nash. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1987, 197-213.
• Basinger, David. Divine Power in Process Theism: A Philosophical Critique. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.
• Brink, Gijsbert van den. Almighty God: A Study of the Doctrine of Divine Omnipotence. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1993 [Ph.D. Dissertation, Univerity of Utrecht].
• Brock, Stephen L. “The ratio omnipotentiae in Aquinas.” Acta Philosophica 2/1 (1993): 17-42.
• Cobb, Jr., John B. A Christian Natural Theology: Based on the Thought of Alfred North Whitehead. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1965.
• Cobb, Jr., John B. God and the World. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1969.
• Cooper, Burton Z. “How Does God Act in our Time? An Invitation to a Dialogue between Process and Liberation Theologies.” Union Seminary Quartely Review 32 (1976-1977): 25-35.
• Davis, Stephen T. “Critique by Stephen T. Davis [on Griffin’s Theodicy].” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. Davis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981, 125-128.
• Davis, Stephen T. (Ed.). Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981.
• Ely, Stephen L. The Religious Availability of Whitehead’s God: A Critical Analysis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1942.
• Evans, Donald D. The Logic of Self-Involvement: A Philosophical Study of Everyday Language with Special Reference to the Christian Use of Language about God as Creator. London: SCM Press, 1963.
• Ford, Lewis S. “Divine Persuasion and the Triumph of Good.” In Process Philosophy and Christian Thought, edited by D. Brown, R.E. James & G. Reeves. Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971, 287-304 (1st publ. 1967)
• Ford, Lewis S. “The Power of God and the Christ.” In Religious Experience and Process Theology, edited by H.J. Cargas & B. Lee. New York: Paulist Press, 1976, 79-92.
• Ford, Lewis S. “Divine Persuasion and Coercion.” Encounter 47/3 (1986): 267-273.
• Ford, Lewis S. “Contrasting Conceptions of Creation.” Review of Metaphysics 45/1 (1991): 89-109.
• Frankenberry, Nancy. “Some Problems in Process Theodicy.” Religious Studies 17/2 (1981): 179-197. [Crossref]
• Geach, Peter. Providence and Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
• Griffin, David R. “Creation out of Chaos and the Problem of Evil.” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. Davis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981, 101-119.
• Griffin, David R. “Creation «Ex Nihilo», The Divine «Modus Operandi», and the «Imitatio Dei».” In Faith and Creativity, edited by G. Nordgulen & G. Shields. St. Louis, Missouri: CBP Press, 1987, 95-123.
• Hare, Peter H. & Edward H. Madden. “Evil and Persuasive Power.” Process Studies 2/1 (1972): 44-48. [Crossref]
• Hartshorne, Charles. “Whitehead’s Idea of God.” In The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, edited by P.A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor, 1951, 513-559. (1e ed. 1941).
• Henrix, Hans Hermann. “Machtentsagung Gottes?” In «Landschaft aus Schreien»: Zur Dramatik der Theodizeefrage, edited by J.B. Metz. Mainz: Matthias Grünewald, 1995, 118-143.
• Henry, Carl F.H. “The Stunted God of Process Theology.” In Process Theology, edited by R. Nash. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1987, 357-376.
• Hick, John H. “Critique by John H. Hick [on Griffin’s Theodicy].” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. Davis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981, 122-123.
• Johnson, A.H. “Some Conversations with Whitehead Concerning God and Creativity.” In Explorations in Whitehead’s Philosophy, edited by L.S. Ford & G.L. Kline. New York: Fordham University Press, 1983, 3-13.
• Jonas, Hans. “The Concept of God after Auschwitz: A Jewish Voice.” Journal of Religion 67 (1987): 1-13. This is Jonas’ own translation of his originally German article: “Der Gottesbegriff nach Auschwitz.” In Fritz Stern & Hans Jonas. Reflexionen finsterer Zeit. Tübingen: Mohr, 1984, 61-86. [Crossref]
• Jonas, Hans. “Is Faith Still Possible? Memories of Rudolf Bultmann and Reflections on the Philosophical Aspects of His Work.” In Hans Jonas, Mortality and Morality: A Search for the Good After Auschwitz, edited and with an introduction by Lawrence Vogel. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1996, 144-164. (1st publ. 1982).
• Jüngel, Eberhard. “Gottes ursprüngliches Anfangen als schöpferische Selbstbegrenzung: Ein Beitrag zum Gespräch mit Hans Jonas über den «Gottesbegriff nach Auschwitz».” In Gottes Zukunft Zukunft der Welt, edited by H. Deuser, G.M. Martin, K. Stock & M. Welke. München: Kaiser Verlag, 1986, 265-275.
• Kraus, Elizabeth M. “God the Savior.” In New Essays in Metaphysics, edited by R.C. Neville. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987, 199-215.
• Lubarsky, Sandra B. “Jonas, Whitehead, and the Problem of Power.” In The Legacy of Hans Jonas: Judaism and the Phenomenon of Life, edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson & Christian Wiese. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2008, 397-417. (= Ch. XVI).
• Madden, Edward H. & Peter H. Hare. “Evil and Unlimited Power.” Review of Metaphysics 20 (1966): 278-289.
• McInerny, Ralph. “Aquinas on Divine Omnipotence.” In L’Homme et son univers au moyen âge: Actes du septième congrès international de philosophie medievale, edited by C. Wenin. Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut Superieur de Philosophie, 1986, 440-444.
• Oomen, Palmyre M.F. “The Prehensibility of God’s Consequent Nature.” Process Studies 27/1-2 (1998): 108-133. (available at: www.palmyreoomen.nl). [Crossref]
• Oomen, Palmyre M.F. “Consequences of prehending God’s consequent nature in a different key.” Process Studies 27/3-4 (1998): 329-331. (available at: www.palmyreoomen.nl). [Crossref]
• Oomen, Palmyre. “Immanence and Divine Persuasion: Whitehead’s Provocative View on the Laws of Nature.” In Process Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution, edited by G.J.Y. Debrock. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi Press, 2003, 87-102. (available at: www.palmyreoomen.nl).
• Oomen, Palmyre. “No Concretion without God.” In La science et le monde moderne d’Alfred North Whitehead: Actes des Journées d’étude internationales tenues à l’Université catholique de Louvain 2003, edited by F. Beets, M. Dupuis & M. Weber. Frankfurt / Lancaster: Ontos Verlag, 2006, 203-220. [=Chromatiques whiteheadiennes III]. (available at: www.palmyreoomen.nl).
• Oomen, Palmyre. “Language about God in Whitehead’s Philosophy: Dissimilarities and Similarities between Aquinas and Whitehead.” Open Theology 1 (2015): 342–353.
• Peters, Ted. Anticipating Omega: Science, Faith , and Our Ultimate Future. Gottingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.
• Peterson, Michael L. “God and Evil in Process Theology.” In Process Theology, edited by R. Nash. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1987, 117-139.
• Roth, John K. “Critique by John K. Roth [on Griffin’s Theodicy].” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. Davis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981, 119-122.
• Sontag, Fr. “Critique by Frederick Sontag [on Griffin’s Theodicy].” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. Davis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981, 123-125.
• Tanner, Kathryn. God and Creation in Christian Theology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
• Tracy, Thomas F. “Special Divine Action and the Laws of Nature.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by R.R. Russell, N. Murphey & W.R. Stoeger. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications / Berkeley, CA: The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2008, 249-283.
• Van den Brink, Gijsbert. see: Brink, Gijsbert van den.
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press, 1967 (1st ed. 1925). (=SMW).
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. New York: Meridian, 1960 (1st ed. 1926). (=RM).
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. (Corrected edition, edited by D.R. Griffin & D.W. Sherburne.) New York: Free Press, 1978 (1st ed. 1929). (=PR).
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967 (1st ed. 1933). (=AI).
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968 (1st ed. 1938). (=MT).
• Whitehead, Alfred North. “Immortality.” In The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, edited by P.A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor, 1951, 682-700 (1st ed. 1941). (=Imm).
• ---

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/opth-2015-0013