Self-Evident Experience: A Challenge to the Empirical Study of Religion

• Authors: Walter Renner
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Empirical psychology’s philosophy of science traditionally orients by Popper’s Critical Rationalism. This paradigm has been successful with observable behavior and some aspects of emotion and cognition. Still, phenomena like spirituality, empathy, or love have been neglected because they can neither be easily communicated nor instantly replicated. I propose to enlarge the scope of empiricism by accepting Self-Evident Experience (SEE) as a source of “soft” empirical data, as long as they (a) can be interpreted within a rationalist framework and (b) are supported by cumulative experiences by others in the course of time. Applying this approach to SEE of a spiritual or religious nature, the theological system of the individual’s denominational affiliation serves as the rational framework (a), and experiences similar to others serve as the accumulated “database” (b), both supporting the validity of the experience. In the sense of Critical Rationalism, apart from arguments (a) and (b), criteria for “falsifying” SEE are suggested: Experiences which are in line with an individual’s or society’s expectations and which lack an impact on the individual’s further course of life will be attributed less validity than experiences which put the individual at risk in today’s climate of skepticism and which substantially influence his or her life.

Keywords

EN

Critical Rationalism; empirical psychology; Self-Evident Experience; mysticism

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Open Theology
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1

Dates

received

2015-07-11

accepted

2015-09-23

online

2015-10-27

Contributors

author

Walter Renner

• Pan-European University, Faculty of Psychology, Bratislava

References

• Aspell, J. E. & Blanke, O. “Understanding the Out-of-Body Experience from a Neuroscientific Perspective.” In Psychological Scientific Perspectives on Out of Body and Near Death Experiences, Psychology Research Progress, edited by C. D. Murray. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2009.
• Davis, C. F. The evidential force of religious experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
• Doblin, R. “Pahnke’s ‘Good Friday Experiment’: A Long-Term Follow-Up and Methodological Critique. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 23 (1991): 1-15.
• Dulles, A. Models of Revelation (2nd ed.). Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1992.
• Feyerabend, P. K. Wider den Methodenzwang (3rd rev. ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983.
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. “Mapping the Moral Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2011): 366-385.
• Green, C. E. Out-of-the-Body Experiences. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1968.
• Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. “Psilocybin Can Occasion Mystical-Type Experiences Having Substantial and Sustained Personal Meaning and Spiritual Significance.” Psychopharmacology 187 (2006): 268–83.
• Grof, S. The Cosmic Game: Explorations of the Frontiers of Human Consciousness. Albany: Sunny Press, 1998.
• Haidt, J. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108 (2011): 814-834.
• Haidt, J. & Joseph, D. “Intuitive ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.” Daedalus (2004, Fall), 55-66.
• Haidt, J. & Kesebir, S. “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology , edited by S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey, (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
• James, W. The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. Lexington, KY., 1902/2014.
• Kuhn, T. S. Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. (2nd, rev. ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979.
• Löffler, W. Wissenschaftstheorie für Theologie-DoktorandInnen (I). University of Innsbruck, Faculty of Theology: Innsbruck, 2010.
• Mezzich, J. E., Kleinman, A., Fabrega, H. & Parron, D. L. (Eds.). Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis: A DSM-IV Perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1996.
• Nelson, J. M. Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality. New York: Springer, 2009.
• Pahnke, W. “Drugs and Mysticism.” International Journal of Parapsychology 8 (1996): 295-314.
• Pahnke, W. & Richards, W. A. “Implications of LSD and Experimental Mysticism.” Journal of Religion and Health 5 (1966): 175-208.
• Popper, K. Logik der Forschung. London: Routledge, 2005/1935.
• Roberts, T. B. & Hruby, P. J. “Toward an Entheogen Research Agenda.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 42 (2002): 71-89.
• Shweder, R. A. “The Cultural Psychology of Suffering: The Many Meanings of Health in Orissa, India (and Elsewhere).” Ethos 36 (2008): 60-77.
• Swinburne, R. (2013). The Existence of God (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Tugwell, S. (Ed.). Albert and Thomas. Selected Writings. Mahwah (NJ): Paulist Press, 1988.
• Wiebe, P. H. Visions of Jesus. Direct Encounters from the New Testament to Today. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
• Zaleski, C. Otherworld Journeys. Accounts of Near Death Experience in Medieval and Modern Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/opth-2015-0023