The Affective Self-regulation of Covert and Overt Reasoning in a Promotion vs. Prevention Mind-set

• Authors: Alina Kolańczyk , Marta Roczniewska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The main hypothesis of studies presented in this article is that episodic implicit evaluations (affects) toward task-relevant objects determine thinking and decisions by actively placing them within or outside the scope of attention. In these studies we also aimed to test the impact of regulatory focus on implicit evaluations and goal pursuit. We applied the Promotion-Prevention Self-control Scale as a measure of mind-set during thinking in the Wason Selection Task (WST) in Study 1 and Island Decision Game (IDG) in Study 2. Directly after learning of the tasks, participants evaluated (in affective priming paradigm) objects that constituted the task’s content. The findings are in line with the hypothesis stating that goals influence the way in which objects are automatically evaluated. The effects of promotion mind-set were more pronounced in both studies. Promotion-focused individuals positively assessed objects that serve as a confirmation. The implicit evaluations by prevention-oriented individuals disclosed their falsifying approach to the WST. The positive implicit evaluation of correct objects suggests their sensitivity to information useful for falsification and is consistent with their tendency to cautiously self-control thinking.

Keywords

EN

affect; self-regulation; attention; reasoning; promotion versus prevention focus Wason Selection Task

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 46
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 228-238

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2015-05-22

Contributors

author

Alina Kolańczyk

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Sopot,Polna Street 16/20, 81-745 Sopot

author

Marta Roczniewska

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Sopot

References

• Aarts, H., Custers. R., & Holland, R. W. (2007). The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuit: When goals and negative affect are coactivated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 2, 165-178. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.165.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Barrett, L.F. (2012). Emotions are real. Emotion, 12, 3, 413- 429. DOI: 10.1037/a0027555[WoS][PubMed][Crossref]
• Brendl, C.M., Markman, A.B., & Messner, C. (2003). The devaluation effect: Activating a need devalues unrelated objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 463-473. DOI: 10.1086/346234.[Crossref]
• Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33-44. DOI: 10.1037/h0058484.[Crossref]
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675.[Crossref]
• Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 2, 129-142. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.129.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1-27. DOI:10.1080/02699930125908.[Crossref]
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50, 2, 229-238. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.2.229.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Ferguson, M. J. (2008). On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 6, 1268-1294. DOI: 10.1037/a0013263.[WoS][Crossref]
• Ferguson, M.J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5, 557-572. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Förster, J., & Higgins T. E. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science: Journal of the American Psychological Society, 16, 8, 631-636.[Crossref]
• Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009.[Crossref]
• Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 6, 1001-1013. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 12, 1280-1300. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.[Crossref]
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23. DOI: 10.1002/ ejsp.27.[Crossref]
• Holyoak, K. J., & Cheng, P. W. (1995). Pragmatic reasoning with a point of view. Thinking and reasoning, 1, 4, 289-313. DOI: 10.1080/13546789508251504.[Crossref]
• Jakitowicz, M. (2008). Attitude in Wason Selective Task. New approach. 2nd Biennial Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology.Personality, Emotion, and Cognition, Warszawa, September 18-21.
• Johnson, R.E., Chang, Ch., & Lord, R.G. (2006). Moving from cognition to behavior: What the research says. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3, 381-415. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.381[Crossref]
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1970). A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 134-148. DOI: 10.1016/0010- 0285(70)90009-5.[Crossref]
• Kolańczyk, A. (2008). Wpływ samokontroli na wartościowanie treści związanych z zadaniem. [The effect of self-control on evaluation of meanings related to a task]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 14, 2, 201-214.
• Kolańczyk, A. (2011). Uwaga ekstensywna. Model ekstensywności vs. intensywności uwagi. [Extensive attention. The extensive vs. intensive attention model]. Studia Psychologiczne [Psychological Studies], 49, 3, 7 - 27.
• Kolańczyk, A. (2012). Building bridges in psychology as exemplified by creative intuition. (in:) M.W. Eysenck, M. Fajkowska, T.
• Maruszewski (eds.) Warsaw Lectures on Personality and Social Psychology. Personality, Cognition and Emotion. Vol. 2, 67-88.
• Kolańczyk, A. (2014). Samo się nie myśli. Afektywne sterowanie procesami poznawczymi. [It does not think itself. Affective steering of cognitive processes.] Sopot: Smak Słowa.
• Kolańczyk, A., Reszko, M. & Mordasiewicz P. (2013). Attentional control and retrieval induced forgetting. Self-regulation perspective. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 44,1, 56-69. DOI -10.2478/ppb-2013-0007[Crossref]
• Kolańczyk, A., Bąk, W., & Roczniewska, M. (2013). Skala Samoregulacji Promocyjnej i Prewencyjnej (SSPP), Psychologia Społeczna. tom 8, 2, 25, 203-218.
• Lewicka, M. (1992). Pragmatic reasoning schemata with differing affective value of a consequent of logical implication. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 237-252
• Lewicka, M., Czapiński, J., & Peeters, G. (1992). Positive-negative asymmetry or “When the heart needs a reason”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 425-434. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220502[Crossref]
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.608. [Crossref]
• Pawłowska-Fusara, M. (2004). Afekt i pamięć mimowolna. (In:) A. Kolańczyk, A. Fila-Jankowska, M. Pawłowska-Fusiara, & R.
• Sterczyński. Serce w rozumie. Afektywne podstawy orientacji w otoczeniu. (82-112). Gdańsk: GWP Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33-60. DOI: 10.1080/14792779108401856.[Crossref]
• Roczniewska, M., & Kolańczyk, A. (2012). Cel uświęca środki, a niekiedy przeszkody? Preferencje zależne od nastawienia regulacyjnego. [Automatic evaluation as a function of regulatory focus and goal pursuit]. Psychologia Społeczna, [Social Psychology], 7, 5 (20), 34-47.
• Roczniewska, M. & Kolańczyk, A. (2014). Competence over communion. Implicit evaluation of personality traits during goal pursuit. Polish Psychological Bulletin , 45 (4), 418-425. DOI - 10.2478/ppb-2014-0046.[Crossref]
• Roczniewska, M., Retowski, S., Osowiecka, M., Wrońska, M. & Słomska, I. (2013). Work Regulatory Focus Scale - Polish adaptation. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12 (2), 115-136.
• Rothermund, K. (2011). Counter-regulation and control-dependency affective processing biases in the service of action regulation. Social Psychology, 42, 1, 56-66. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000043.[WoS][Crossref]
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 2. 198-211. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198.[Crossref]
• Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L. Gil, Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F., (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1, 36-45. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.36.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ppb-2015-0031