Can recycling compensate for speeding on highways? Similarity and difficulty of behaviors as key characteristics of green compensatory beliefs

• Authors: Katarzyna Byrka , Katarzyna Kaminska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

People believe that the effects of unecological behaviors may be compensated for by engaging in alternative conservation activities. The problem is, however, that those who hold such beliefs are less likely to engage in real behaviors. Understanding the structure of compensatory beliefs could potentially minimize this negative effect. In a pair of studies (qualitative and quantitative) we explored two aspects that appear key for compensatory beliefs 1) the similarity and 2) the relative difficulty of behaviors. We found that people spontaneously proposed compensatory behaviors which belonged to the same pro-ecological domain as the corresponding initial behaviors (Study 1). However, participants in the quantitative study agreed more often that they should compensate for one behavior with another when both behaviors belonged to the same cognitive category and simultaneously the compensatory behavior was relatively less demanding than the initial one (Study 2).

Keywords

EN

Green compensatory beliefs; difficulty of behaviors; similarity; compensatory behaviors; spillover effects

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 46
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 477-487

Dates

published

2015-09-01

online

2015-11-17

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Byrka

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw Faculty, Poland

author

Katarzyna Kaminska

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw Faculty, Poland

References

• Baumeister, R.F., & Heatherton, T.F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1-15.[Crossref]
• Burger, J.M. (1999). The Foot-in-the-Door Compliance Procedure: A Multiple-Process Analysis and Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303-325. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2[Crossref]
• Byrka, K. (in press). Łańcuchowe zmiany zachowań w kontekście ochrony środowiska i promocji zdrowia. [Chain changes in behaviors in the context of environemntal conservation and health promotion] Warszawa: PWN.
• Cialdini, R.B., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 295-300. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.3.295[Crossref]
• Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407[Crossref]
• Crano, W.D., & Sivacek, J. (1982). Social Reinforcement, Self-Attribution, and the Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon. Social Cognition, 1(2), 110-125. http://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1982.1.2.110[Crossref]
• Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 754-765. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.754[Crossref]
• Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists (1 edition). Mahwah, N.J: Psychology Press.
• Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Foss, R.D., & Dempsey, C.B. (1979). Blood donation and the foot-in-thedoor technique: A limiting case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 580-590. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.580[Crossref]
• Geller, H., & Attali, S. (2005). The experience with energy efficiency policies and programmes in IEA countries. Learning from the Critics. Paris: IEA. IEA Information Paper. Retrieved from http://www04.abb.com/db/db0003/db002698.nsf/4e128623f4b79832c1256a5d0049ce68/0912873430b22467c12571da0032d460/$FILE/The%20Experience%20With%20Energy%20Efficiency%20Policies%20and%20Programmes%20in%20IEA%20Countries.pdf
• Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1999). Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x [Crossref]
• Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
• Kaiser, F.G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for Attitude Research. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Sage Publications Inc.), 14(4), 351-367. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366452[WoS][Crossref]
• Kaiser, F.G., & Schultz, P.W. (2009). The Attitude-Behavior Relationship: A Test of Three Models of the Moderating Role of Behavioral Difficulty 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(1), 186-207. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00435.x [Crossref]
• Kaiser, F.G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing People’s General Ecological Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Measure1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 952-978. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x [Crossref]
• Kaiser, F.G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531-1544. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003[Crossref]
• Kaklamanou, D., Jones, C.R., Webb, T.L., & Walker, S.R. (2013). Using Public Transport Can Make Up for Flying Abroad on Holiday: Compensatory Green Beliefs and Environmentally Significant Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 184-204. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513488784[WoS][Crossref]
• Klein, W.M., & Goethals, G.R. (2002). Social reality and self-construction: A case of“ bounded irrationality?.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(2), 105-114.[Crossref]
• Knäuper, B., Rabiau, M., Cohen, O., & Patriciu, N. (2004). Compensatory health beliefs: scale development and psychometric properties. Psychology & Health, 19(5), 607-624. http://doi.org/10.1080/0887044042000196737[Crossref]
• Kronick, I., Auerbach, R.P., Stich, C., & Knäuper, B. (2011). Compensatory beliefs and intentions contribute to the prediction of caloric intake in dieters. Appetite, 57(2), 435-438. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.306[Crossref][WoS]
• McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55(5), 531-537. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.531[Crossref]
• Miquelon, P., Knäuper, B., & Vallerand, R.J. (2012). Motivation and goal attainment. The role of compensatory beliefs. Appetite, 58(2), 608-615. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.025[WoS][Crossref]
• Radtke, T., Scholz, U., Keller, R., & Hornung, R. (2011). Smoking is ok as long as I eat healthily: Compensatory Health Beliefs and their role for intentions and smoking within the Health Action Process Approach. Psychology & Health, 27(sup2), 91-107. http://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.603422[Crossref][WoS]
• Stern, P.C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. http://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175[Crossref]
• Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 93-103. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2[Crossref]
• Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and Painless? The Limitations of Spillover in Environmental Campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(2), 141-163. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1[Crossref]
• Thøgersen, J., & Noblet, C. (2012). Does green consumerism increase the acceptance of wind power? Energy Policy, 51, 854-862. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.044[WoS][Crossref]
• Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 225-236. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5[Crossref]
• Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A.R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., & Vandenbergh, M.P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004[Crossref]
• Wright, B.D., & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL, MESA Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ppb-2015-0054