Literary Competence of Future Philology Teachers’ Professional Development (Based on the Educational Experience of Germany)

• Authors: Ludmyla Bazyl
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The author performs a theoretical analysis of the educational experience in philology teachers’ professional training in Germany in the context of solving scientific problem of literary competence development. Internal and external factors of this process have been determined both by socio-political realities, economic, philosophical, cultural, psychological factors, and the dynamics of the literary process in developed countries, content diversity of literary studies, methodological, aesthetic, methodological factors of mastering literature process have been emphasized. Particular attention has been paid to designing strategies for studying modern literature based on Bourdieu’s theory providing a detailed understanding of specific contexts and holistic understanding of the literary field due to metadiscourse analysis. Through the use of empirical data the process of literary field theory establishing in the German literature study has been explained, attention has been focused on reviewing the G. Grass’ latest novel by literary critics under the influence of external and internal factors of literary process development that specifies educational process of literary competence development.

Keywords

EN

future philology teacher; professional training; competence; literary competence; literary field theory; context; metadiscourse; postmodern literature

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Comparative Professional Pedagogy
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 52-59

Dates

published

2015-03-01

online

2015-03-13

Contributors

author

Ludmyla Bazyl

• Postgraduate Education Institute of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Ukraine

References

• 1.Bauer, K.-O., Brindt, S., Kopka, A. (1996). Padagogische Professionalitat und Lehrerarbeit | Pedagogical Professionalism and Activity]. Weinheim und Miinchen, p. 473 (in German).
• 2.Emmerich, E. (2006). Das literarische Feld Deutschland - 15 Jahre nach der Wende | Literature Field in Germany - 15 years after the change]. Revista de Filologia Alemana, Vol. 14, p. 113-130 (in German).
• 3.Jtirgensen, Ch., Kaiser, G. (2011). Schriftstellerische Inszenierungspraktiken. Heuristische Typologie und Genese | Literary Stage practice. Heuristic typology and genesis], Typologie und Geschichte, p. 9-30 (in German).
• 4.Liessmann, K. P. (1995). Von Tomi nach Moor. Asthetische Potenzen. Nach der Postmo-derne [From Tomi to Moor. Aesthetic Potential. After the Postmodern] Kursbuch 122, p. 21-32 (in German).
• 5.Loescher, J. (2008). Kultur als Gedachtnis. Deutungskampfe im Literarischen Feld der Nachwende Kulturpoetik [Culture as Memory. Interpretation Battle at the Literary Field of the Post-cultural Poetics]. KulturPoetik, Volume 8, Issue 1, p. 86-104 (in German).
• 6.Negt, O. (1996). Der Fall Fonty. «Ein weites Feld» von Gunter Grass im Spiegel der Kritik |The Fall of Fonty. “A broad field” by Gunter Grass in the mirror of criticism]. Gottingen, Steidl, p. 495 (in German).
• 7.Schmitz, H. (1995, 26 Aug). Gutachten ueber Wcttes Feld vom G. Grass [Review on A Wide Field by G. Grass], Frankfurter Rundschau, (in German).
• 8.Soefner, H. G. (1986). Stil und Stilisierung [Style and Stylisation] 57/7. Geschichten und Funktionen eines kulturgeschichtlichen Diskurselements. p. 317-341 (in German).
• 9.Потемина, M. C. (2007). Мультимедийньїй спектакль: роман Гюнтера Грасса «Широкое поле» и литературная критика [“Wide Field” by G. Grass and Literary Critics], Коммуникативная иноязьічная компетенция как предмет педагогического и лингвистического исследования, р. 49-53 (in Russian).
• 10.Фуко, М. (1996). Воля к истине: по ту сторону знання, власти и сексуальносте. Работьі разньїх лет [Desire for Truth : beyond the knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different periods]. M. : Касталь, p. 448 (in Russian).

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/rpp-2015-0021