Postsocialism or when ‘Having’ is another Way of ‘Being’. The Reconfiguring of Identity through Land Restitution and the Narratives of the Past

• Authors: Elena Chiorean
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper I examine the consequences of the 1989 political overturn in Romania on the selfhood. To this purpose, I initiate a twofold analysis: the official discourse of both socio-political systems, socialism and liberalism, and the individual’s quotidian discourse. The first one will enable a comparative view, over the ’bottom-up’ constructed realities, and the second will account for the degree of pervasiveness and naturalization of ideological views and, in this way, of a “top-down” identity construction and its configurations. One of the most apprehensible provisions through which liberalism endeavoured to institutionalize its own way of setting out reality is land restitution. Thereafter, I will discuss the way re-appropriation was experienced and its various subjectivization trajectories, but also the wider frame of the postsocialist economic transformations: rethinking work, money, the state and the interrelations between them. This particular angle of sight will disclose the mechanisms through which liberalism has deconstructed the system of socialist meaning and representation, at the same time replacing it with a socio-political order which reconfigured these meanings.

Keywords

EN

property; ideology; selfhood; socialism; liberalism

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 39-56

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2016-01-29

Contributors

author

Elena Chiorean

• MA in Applied Anthropology at the Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca and in Sociology and Social Anthropology at the Central European University, Budapest

References

• Berger, P.L.. and Luckmann, Th. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin. (First published, 1966).
• Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Greenwood, pp. 241-258.
• Corduneanu, I. V. (2002). Cultural Identities and the Research of Recent Romanian Past. Southeastern Europe/L´Europe du Sud-Est, 29:1-16.
• Goina, C. (2005). “Ce poţi face azi nu lăsa pe mâine”: cazul colhozului-model “Viaţă Nouă”, Sântana [„Don’t do tomorrow what you can do today”: the Case of the Prototipe Kolkhoz „New Life”, Sântana]. In Dobrincu, D. and Iordachi, C. (eds.): Ţărănimea şi puterea. Procesul de colectivizare a agriculturii în România (1949-1962) [Peasantry and Power. The Collectivization of Agriculture in Romania (1949-1962)]. Iaşi: Polirom, pp. 368-392.
• Hann, C. M., Humphrey, C., Verdery, K. (2002). Introduction: Postsocialism as a Topic of Anthropological Investigation. In Hann, C.M. (ed.): Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London: Routledge, pp. 1-28.
• Humphrey, C. and Verdery, K. (2004). Introduction: Raising Questions about Property. In Humphrey, C. and Verdery, K. (eds.): Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford: Berg, pp. 1-25.
• Jenkins, R. (2008). Social Identity. New York: Routledge. (First published, 1996).
• Kideckel, D. A. (1993). The Solitude of Collectivism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
• Kideckel, D. A. (2008). Getting By in Postsocialist Romania: Labor, the Body, and Working-Class Culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Kornai, J. (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 62-91.
• Kornai, J. (2000). What the Change of System from Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1):27-42.[Crossref]
• Lampland, M. (2002). The Advantages of Being Collectivized: Cooperative Farm Managers in the Postsocialist Economy. In Hann, C.M. (ed.): Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London: Routledge, pp. 31-55.
• MacPherson, C.B. (1978). The Meaning of Property. In MacPherson, C.B. (ed.): Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 1-13.
• Marcuse, P. (1996). Privatization and Its Discontents: Property Rights in Land and Housing in the Transition in Eastern Europe. In Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (eds.): Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Postsocialist Societies (Studies in Urban and Social Change). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 119-191.
• Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Stanilov, K. (2007). Democracy, Markets, and Public Space in the Transitional Societies of Central and Eastern Europe. In Stanilov, K. (ed.): The Postsocialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 269-283.
• Verdery, K. (1996). What Was Socialism and What Comes Next?. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Verdery, K. (2000). The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Verdery, K. (2004). The Obligations of Ownership: Restoring Rights to Land in Postsocialist Transylvania. In Humphrey, C. and Verdery, K. (eds.): Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford: Berg, pp. 139-159.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/subbs-2015-0009