Book Review: Dependency and Development. The Political Economy of Romanian Capitalism

• Authors: Norbert Petrovici
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 137-152

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2016-01-29

Contributors

author

Norbert Petrovici

• Sociology Department, Babeş-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca

References

• Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Anderson, P. (2013a). Consilium. New Left Review, 83(sept.-oct.).
• Anderson, P. (2013b). Imperium. New Left Review, 83(sept.-oct.).
• Ban, C. (2015). Beyond Anticommunism The Fragility of Class Analysis in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 29(3): 640-650.[Crossref][WoS]
• Bockman, J. (2011). Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Bockman, J., and Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a Labouratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism1. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2): 310-352.[Crossref]
• Bohle, D., and Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Itacha and London: Cornell University Press.
• Brenner, R. (2006). An Alternative Approach to the Long Downturn The Economics of Global Turbulence: the Advanced Capitalist Economies from Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945-2005. London: Verso, pp. 27-40.
• Burawoy, M. (2001). Neoclassical Sociology: From the End of Communism to the End of Classes. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4): 1099–1120.[Crossref]
• Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization studies, 26(8): 1229-1250.[Crossref]
• Chibber, V. (2003). Locked in Place: State-building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
• Cucu, A.-S. (2014). Producing knowledge in productive spaces: ethnography and planning in early socialist Romania. Economy and Society, 43(2): 211-232.[WoS][Crossref]
• Cucu, A.-S., and Culic, I. (2012). Procese de configurare a claselor sociale în România. O analiză relaţională a căsătoriilor pentru cinci generaţii [Processes of social class configuration in Romania: a correspondence analysis of marriages across five generations]. In T. Rotariu and V. Voineagu (Eds.), Inerţie şi schimbare. Dimensiuni sociale ale tranziţiei în România [Inertia and change. Social dimensions of transition in Romania]. Iaşi: Polirom, pp. 159-170.
• Culic, I. (2002). Câștigătorii: elita politică și democratizare în România 1989-2000. Cluj: Limes.
• Culic, I. (2006). From amateur revolutionaries to professional politicians: the Transformation of the romanian political elite, 1990-2004. International Journal of Sociology, 36(1): 69-92.[Crossref]
• Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Vol. 25). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Eyal, G., Szelényi, I., and Townsley, E. (1998). Making Capitalism without Capitalists: Class Formation and Elite Struggles in Post-Communist Central Europe. London: Verso.
• Eyal, G., Szelényi, I., and Townsley, E. (2001). The Utopia of Postsocialist Theory and the Ironic View of History in Neoclassical Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4): 1121–1128.[Crossref]
• Hall, P. A., and Soskics, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (2009). Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in European Economy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kocka, J. (1995). The middle classes in Europe. The Journal of Modern History, 67(4): 783-806.[Crossref]
• Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Love, J. L. (1996). Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Underdevelopment in Rumania and Brazil. Stanford Stanford University Press.
• MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (2007). Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton and Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
• Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. (2007). An introduction to market devices. The sociological review, 55(2): 1-12.
• Nölke, A., and Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(04): 670-702.[Crossref][WoS]
• Pasti, V. (1997). The Challenges of Transition: Romania in Transition. Boulder: East European Monographs.
• Petrovici, N. (2006). Relaţii de putere în cadrul elitei politice româneşti la sfârşitul anilor ‘80 şi începutul anilor ‘90 [Power relations within the Romanian political elite at the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s]. Sociologie Romaneasca, IV(1): 119-145.
• Poenaru, F. (2011). Care e problema cu PSD-ul? [What’s the problem with PSD?]. Critic Atact, 15.11.2011, (20.11.2011).
• Stark, D., and Bruszt, L. (1998). Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Williams, M. (2014). The End of the Developmental State? New York and Oxon: Routledge.
• Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.). (1999). The Developmental State. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
• Zamfir, C. (2004). O analiză critică a tranziției: ce va fi “după” [A critical analysis of transition: what is going to be “after”]. Iași: Polirom.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/subbs-2015-0012