The Cognitive Profile of a Talented Foreign Language Learner. A Case Study

• Authors: Adriana Biedroń , Anna Szczepaniak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article examines a variety of cognitive individual variables of a talented foreign language learner. The research complies with the qualitative and quantitative criteria of choice of a talented learner proposed by Arancibia et al., (2008); Hartas et al., (2008); Hewston et al., (2005), and Skehan, (1998). Cognitive variables included tested: foreign language aptitude, verbal and non-verbal intelligence, learning styles, and learning strategies. The purpose of the research was to construct an extended cognitive profile of a 21-year-old student proficient in three languages. The research revealed that the subject is linguistically talented, especially in the area of phonological, analytical, and memory abilities. It is hypothesized that her superior abilities result from an extraordinarily efficient short-term phonological memory (Mackey et al., 2002). She uses miscellaneous learning strategies and her learning styles are versatile. The final conclusion is that research into linguistic talent is scarce, therefore further investigation, especially in the field of working memory of talented foreign language learners, is required.

Keywords

EN

language aptitude; linguistic abilities; talent; cognitive factors; learning styles and strategies

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Psychology of Language and Communication
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 53-71

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2009-06-15

Contributors

author

Adriana Biedroń

• The Pomeranian Academy, Słupsk

author

Anna Szczepaniak

• The Pomeranian Academy, Słupsk

References

• Arancibia, W., Lissi, M.R., & Narca, M. (2008). Impact in the school system of a strategy for identifying and selecting academically talented students: the experience of Program PENTA- UC. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 53-63.
• Atkins, P.W.B., & Baddeley, A. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537-552.[Crossref]
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language acquisition device. Psychological Review, 105, 158-173.[Crossref]
• Bates, J., & Munday, S. (2005). Able, Gifted and Talented. London: The SEN series.
• Brzezinski, J., Gaul, M., Hornowska, E., Machowski, A., & Zakrzewska, M. (1996). Skala inteligencji D. Wechslera dla doroslych. Wersja zrewidowana. WAIS-R (Pl). Podrěcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
• Carroll, J.B. (1959). Use of the Modern Language Aptitude Test in Secondary Schools. Yearbook of the National Council on Measurements Used in Education, 16, 155-159.
• Carroll, J.B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K.C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, M. A: Newbury House.
• Carroll, J.B. (1985). Second language abilities. In R.J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Human abilities: an information-processing approach (pp. 83-101). New York: W.H. Freeman.
• Carroll, J.B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Modern Language Aptitude Test. MLAT. Manual 2002 Edition. N. Bethesda, Maryland: Second Language Testing, Inc.
• Corno, L, Cronbach, L.J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D.F., Mandinach, E.B., Porteus, A.W., & Talbert, J.E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Crowell, S.E. (2004). The neurobiology of declarative memory. In: J.H. Schumann, (Ed.), The Neurobiology of Learning: Perspectives from Second Language Learning (pp. 75-109). Mahwah: LEA.
• De Bot, K. (2006). The plastic bilingual brain: Synaptic pruning or growth? Commentary on Green et al. In M. Gullberg, & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 127-132). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Dörnyei, Z, & Skehan, P. (2005). Individual differences in second language learning. In: C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long, (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 589-630). United Kingdom: Blackwell.
• Ehrman, M.E. (1996). Understanding Second Language Learning Difficulties. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Ehrman, M. (1998). The Modern Language Aptitude Test for predicting learning success and advising students. Applied Language Learning, 9(1-2), 31-70.
• Ehrman, M.E., & Oxford, R.L. (1995). Cognition plus: correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 7/1, 67-89.[Crossref]
• Ellis, R. (1995). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, N.C., & Sinclair, S.G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 234-250.
• Ely, Ch., M. (1995). Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in EFL/ESL Classroom (pp. 216-217). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson International.
• Engle, R.W., Laughlin, J.E., Tuholski, S.W., & Conway, A.R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latentvariable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128/3, 309-331.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9/2, 147-171.[Crossref]
• Fein, D., & Obler, L.K. (1988). Neuropsychological study of talent: a developing field. In L.K. Obler & D. Fein (Ed.), The Exceptional Brain (pp. 3-15). NY, London: The Guilford Press.
• Golestani, N., Paus, T., & Zatorre, R.J. (2002). Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron, 35, 997-1010.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., LeBihan, D., & Pallier, C. (2006). Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17/3, 575-582.[Crossref]
• Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 1-14.
• Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J., & Ehrman, M.E. (2000). A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: the CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390-405[Crossref]
• Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19/3, 379-400.
• Hartas, D., Lindsay, G., & Muijs, R. D (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY summer school: emerging issues and future considerations. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 5-18.[Crossref]
• Hewston, R., Campbell, R.J., Eyre, D., Muijs, R.D., Neelands, J.G., & Robinson, W. (2005). A baseline review of the literature on effective pedagogies for gifted and talented students. Occasional Paper 5. Coventry: The University of Warwick.
• Ioup, G., Boustagi, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Re-examining the CPH. A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73-98.
• Krashen, S.D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. W: A. Healy, L. Bourne (Ed.), Foreign Language Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 339-364.
• Morgan, G., Smith, N., Tsimpli, I., & Woll, B. (2007). Classifier learning and modality in a polyglot savant. Lingua, 117/7, 1339-1353.
• Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81-108.
• Neufeld, G. (1979). Towards a theory of language learning aptitude. Language Learning, 29, 227-241.[Crossref]
• Něcka, E. (2003). Inteligencja. Geneza, Struktura, Funkcje. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Obler, L. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Issues (pp. 141-159). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
• O'Maley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Oxford, R.L. (1990a). Styles, Strategies, and Aptitude: Connections for Language Learning. In T.S. Parry, & C.W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered (pp. 67-125). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
• Oxford, R.L. (1990b). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
• Oxford, R.L. (1995). Style Analysis Survey. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in EFL/ESL Classroom (pp. 208-215). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/ Thomson International.
• Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
• Reid, J.M. (Ed.), (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle/ Thomson International.
• Reid, J.M. (Ed.), (1998). Understanding Learning Styles in the Second Language Classroom. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
• Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.[Crossref]
• Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 113-133). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Robinson P. (2005). Attention and memory during SLA. In: C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 631-678). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Robinson P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In: R.M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in Second Language. (pp. 256-286). Cambridge: CUP.
• Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.[Crossref]
• Rubin, J., & Wenden, A. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
• Sasaki, M. (1999). Second Language Proficiency, Foreign Language Aptitude, and Intelligence. Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
• Sawyer, M. & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 319-354). Cambridge: CUP.
• Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior-genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In: R.J. Sternberg, & E.L. Grigorenko, (Eds.), Intelligence, Heredity and Environment (pp. 3-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 127-158.
• Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
• Schneiderman, E.I., & Desmarais, C. (1988). The talented language learner: some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4/2, 91-109.[Crossref]
• Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209-231.
• Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21-50.[Crossref]
• Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
• Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 69-95). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Smith N., & Tsimpli I. (1991). Linguistic modularity? A case study of a ‘savant’ linguist. Lingua, 84, 315-351.[Crossref]
• Sparks, R.L., Artzer, M., Ganschow, L., Siebenhar, D., Plageman, M., & Patton, J. (1998a). Differences in native-language skills, foreign-language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high-, average-, and low-proficiency foreign language learners: two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181-216
• Sparks, R.L., Javorsky, J., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1998b). Factors in the Prediction of Achievement and Proficiency in a Foreign Language. Applied Language Learning, 9/1, 71-105.
• Sternberg, R.J. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In P. Robinson. (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 13 - 43). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2000). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: CUP.
• Threlfall, J., & Hargreaves, M. (2008). The problem-solving methods of mathematically gifted and older average-attaining students. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 83-98.[Crossref]
• Wesche, M.B., Edwards, H. and Wells, W. (1982). Foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 127 - 140.[Crossref]
• Wojtowicz, M. (2006). Test Zdolności Jězykowych, TZJ (The Language Abilities Test). Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/V10057-009-0004-7