Spectral Resemblances and Elusive Connections: A Practice-led Research Dialogue between Poetry and Digital Imagery

• Authors: Paul Hetherington , Anita Fitton
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the early 20th century the function of poetic imagery was given international attention through the Imagist movement in London and, ever since, many poets have self-consciously employed and exploited imagist techniques. At the same time poets and visual artists have frequently explored connections between each other’s works considering, as Art Berman writes, that “the visual can provide direct and even prelinguistic knowledge since the psyche presumably has operations that precede or take logical precedence over […] language” (49). Interart comparisons suggest that poetry and the visual arts can be talked about as if “work in one medium […] were operating in another” (Dayan 3). However, it is often unclear what it might mean to describe a work of visual art as “poetic” or a poem as “visual.” This paper explores these ideas with reference to Paul Hetherington’s and Anita Fitton’s practice-led research project, Spectral Resemblances. The project is investigating some of the ways in which written poetry and still visual imagery may convey related meanings. It asks whether meaningful connections between poetic and visual imagery are at best “spectral” and elusive. It explores how the juxtapositioning of complementary works in these different media may allow resonances to play back and forth in the conceptual spaces between them.

Keywords

EN

Imagery; poetry; interart; digital; indeterminate; spectral; resemblances

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: American, British and Canadian Studies Journal
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 17-38

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-08-07

Contributors

author

Paul Hetherington

• University of Canberra and the North Melbourne Institute of TAFE

author

Anita Fitton

• University of Canberra and the North Melbourne Institute of TAFE

References

• Aichelle, Kathryn Porter. Paul Klee: Poet/Painter. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2006.
• Alexander, Michael. The Poetic Achievement of Ezra Pound. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.
• Appollinaire, Guillaume. Calligrammes. Bilingual edition, Trans. Anne Hyde Greet. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
• Barry, Ann Marie Seward. Visual Intelligence: Perception, Image, andManipulation in Visual Communication. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1997.
• Beach, Christopher. The Cambridge Introduction to Twentieth-century AmericanPoetry . Cambridge: Cambridge niversity Press , 2003.
• Beasley, Rebecca. Ezra Pound and the Visual Culture of Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
• Berman, Art. Preface to Modernism. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1994.
• Beveridge, Judith. The Domesticity of Giraffes. Wentworth Falls: Black Lightning Press, 1987.
• Bohn, Willard. Modern Visual Poetry. Cranbury, N.J.: Associated University Presses, 2001.
• Bly, Robert. Silence in the Snowy Fields: Poems. Middletown, C.T.: Wesleyan University Press, 1962.
• Bremner, Craig. “Later Readings Review.” Anita Fitton, Later Readings. Canberra: University of Canberra, 2009. n. pag.
• Cahill, James. The Lyric Journey: Poetic Painting in China and Japan. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1996.
• Dallow, Peter. “Representing Creativeness: Practice Based Approaches to Research in Creative Arts.” Art, Design & Communication in HigherEducation 2.1-2: 49-66.
• Davidson, Michael. Ghostlier Demarcations: Modern Poetry and the MaterialWorld. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
• Dayan, Peter. Art as Music, Music as Poetry, Poetry as Art: from Whistler toStravinsky and Beyond. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.
• Eliot, T.S. Selected Poems. London: Faber, 1976.
• Elkins, James. Why Are Our Pictures Puzzles? On the Modern Origins ofPictorial Complexity. London: Routledge, 1999.
• Fenollosa, Ernest and Ezra Pound. The Chinese Written Character as a Mediumfor Poetry. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.
• Fitton, Anita. “Cave Swimming.” npublished digital image, 2011.
• Fitton, Anita. “Plumber.” npublished digital image, 2011.
• Fitton, Anita. “The Pond.” npublished digital image, 2011.
• Fitton, Anita and Paul Hetherington, “Spectral Resemblances: Project Criteria and Research Question.” npublished Word document, 2011.
• Flint, F.S. “Imagisme.” Poetry: A Magazine of Verse 1.6. March 2013: 198-200.
• Gamboni, Dario. Potential Images: Ambiguity and Indeterminacy in Modern Art. London: Reaktion Books, 2002.
• Gombrich, E.H. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of PictorialRepresentation. London: The Folio Society, 2000.
• Halter, Peter. The Revolution in the Visual Arts and the Poetry of William CarlosWilliams. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
• Herbert, George. The English Poems of George Herbert. Ed. C.A. Patrides. London: Dent, 1977.
• Hetherington, Paul. Six Different Windows. Crawley, WA: UWA Publishing, 2013.
• Hetherington, Paul. “Cave Swimming.” npublished poem, 2012.
• Hughes, Glenn. Imagism & the Imagists: A Study in Modern Poetry. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1931.
• Hühn, Peter and Jens Kiefer. The Narratological Analysis of Lyric Poetry:Studies in English Poetry from the 16th to the 20th Century. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005.
• Jones, Peter. Imagist Poetry. London: Penguin, 1976.
• Little, William, H.W. Fowler, and Jessie Coulson. The Shorter Oxford EnglishDictionary on Historical Principles. 3rd ed. Rev. and ed. C.T Onions; completely reset with etymologies rev. by G.W.S Friedrichsen. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1973.
• Loizeaux, Elizabeth Bergmann. Twentieth-Century Poetry and the Visual Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
• McCorkle, James. “The Inscription of Postmodernism in Poetry.” InternationalPostmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice. Eds. Johannes William Bertens and Douwe Fokkema. Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1997.
• Nadal, Ira B. The Cambridge Companion to Ezra Pound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
• Nelson, Howard. Robert Bly: An Introduction to the Poetry. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.
• Potter, Claire. Swallow. Melbourne: Five Islands Press, 2010.
• Pound, Ezra. Personae: Collected Shorter Poems of Ezra Pound. London: Faber & Faber, 1952. Pound, Ezra. “The Serious Artist.” The New Freewoman 1. 9 (1913): 161-63. Web. 21 September 2011. <http://dl.lib.brown.edu/repository2/ repoman.php?verb=render&id=1303308737203252&view=pageturner>.
• Pound, Ezra. “Vorticism.” the Fortnightly Review 96, 1 September 1914: 461-471; also The Fortnightly Review. Web. 18 March 2013 <http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/vorticism/>.
• Rainey, Lawrence, ed. Modernism: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
• Rozik, Eli. “The Common Deep Structure of Verbal and Iconic Metaphors.” Interart Poetics: Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media. Eds.
• Ulla Britta Lagerroth, Hans Lund and Erik Hedling. Amsterdam: Edition Rodopi B.V., 1997.
• Ruthven, K.K. A Guide to Ezra Pound’s Personae (1926). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1893.
• Sandqvist, Mona. “Alchemy and Interart.” Interart Poetics: Essays on theInterrelations of the Arts and Media. Eds. Ulla Britta Lagerroth, Hans Lund and Erik Hedling. Amsterdam: Edition Rodopi B.V., 1997.
• Scofield, Martin. T.S. Eliot: The Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• Smith, Cathy. “Between-ness: Theory and Practice Within the Margins of Excess.” IDEA Journal 2003: 131-144.
• Smithson, Robert. Robert Smithson: The Collected Writings. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
• Stoichita, Victor I. A Short History of the Shadow. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.
• Tryphonopoulos, Demetres P. and Stephen J. Adams, eds. The Ezra PoundEncyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2005.
• Williams, William Carlos. Selected Poems. Ed. Charles Tomlinson. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/abcsj-2013-0011