Taking Collaborative Stances to Tell the Story. A Socio-linguistic Approach to Nick Hornby’s A Long Way Down

• Authors: Dorina-Daniela Vasiloiu
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the present study, I seek to examine narrative in consideration of three of its most important dimensions: the social (others’ narratives), the cognitive (acquisition of knowledge through stories), and the linguistic (acquiring and producing knowledge through language). There is no point of contention that ‘narrative’ is essentially communicative and dependent on a sociolinguistic and cultural context. Yet, with regard to fictional narratives, recent studies on text processing challenge the view of text as communication in its conventional sense. I explore the way(s) in which fictional worlds communicate from the constructivist standpoint and set out to develop the notion of narratorial stance. I then make use of the concept in the close reading section of the paper in order to examine and exemplify the modes in which Hornby’s homodiegetic narrators represent themselves and the others in their ‘turn-at-talk’ or stance-taking acts

Keywords

EN

(narrative) communication; narratorial stance; stance taking; plurality; intersubjectivity; socio-linguistics

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: American, British and Canadian Studies Journal
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 199-213

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-08-07

Contributors

author

Dorina-Daniela Vasiloiu

• Heidelberg University

References

• Bruner, Jerome. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986.
• Crossley, Nick. Intersubjectivity. The Fabric of Social Becoming. London: Sage Publications, 1996.
• Dixon, Peter, and Marisa Bortolussi. “Text Is Not Communication: A Challenge to a Common Assumption.” Discourse Processes 31.1 (2001): 1-25.
• ---. “Literary communication: Effects of reader - narrator cooperation.” Poetics 23 (1996): 405-430.
• Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen. “Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction.” Text and Talk 32.4 (2012): 433-451.
• Du Bois, John W. “The stance triangle.” Stancetaking in Discourse. Ed. Robert Englebretson. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. 139-182.
• Herman, David. Story Logic. Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2002.
• Hornby, Nick. A Long Way Down. London: Penguin Book, 2005.
• Kärkkaäinen, Elise. “Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity.” Text and Talk 26.6 (2006): 699-731.
• Mar, Raymond A., and Keith Oatley. “The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience.” Perspectives on PsychologicalScience 3.3 (2008): 173-192.[WoS]
• Niemelä, Maarit. Resonance in Storytelling: Verbal, Prosodic and EmbodiedPractices of Stance Taking. Oulu: University of Oulu, 2011.
• Nünning, Vera. “Ethics and Aesthetics in British Novels at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century.” Ethics in Culture. The Dissemination of Valuesthrough Literature and Other Media. Eds. Astrid Erll, Herbert Grabes, and Ansgar Nünning. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. 369-391.
• Nünning, Vera, and Ansgar Nünning. An Introduction to the Study of English andAmerican Literature. Trans. Jane Dewhurst. Stuttgart: Klett, 2009.
• Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself As Another. Trans. Kathleen Blamey. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
• Tomasello, Michael. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/abcsj-2013-0015