A Place-Based Approach in EU Regional Development and Its Application in Latvia

• Authors: Līga Baltiņa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The EU’s regional development policy is gradually moving from the redaction of regional disparities towards regional development growth. The role and involvement of regional and local authorities in regional development policy is increasing. Global changes and challenges call for a growing need to develop more efficient regional development policy instruments that would result in growth and increased quality> of life. Place-based approach is a strategic approach aimed at the development of territorial resources. The aim of this research is to evaluate the role of place-based approach in regional development, to identify and assess the main elements and opportunities brought by the implementation of such an approach.

Keywords

EN

place-based approach; regional development; territorial cohesion

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 34-53

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-05-17

Contributors

author

Līga Baltiņa

• Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Latvia Aspazijas blv. 5, Riga LV-1050, Latvia

References

• Acemoglu, D. (2010), ‘Institutions, Factor Prices and Taxation: Virtues of Strong States?’ American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 115-29.
• Adams, N.; Alden, J. & Harris, N. (2012), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
• Aghion, P. & Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Alexiadis, S. (2013), Convergence Clubs and Spatial Externalities: Models and Applications of Regional Convergence in Europe, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31626-5 Auerbach, A. J. (2009), ‘Implementing the New Fiscal Policy Activism,’ Ameiican Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 543-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.543[Crossref]
• Bachtler, J. & Yuill, D. (2007), Regional Policy in Western Europe: Taking Stock of the Shift in Paradigm, Bochum: RUFIS.
• Baltiņa, L. (2011), ‘Uz vietu balstlta pieeja ES regionalas politikas efektivitates uzlabosanai,’ Latvijas Universitates raksti: Ekonomika un vadJbas zinatne, 766. sejums. Riga: Latvijas Universitate, pp. 106-120.
• Baltiņa, L. & Muravska, T. (2012), Eiropas Savienlbas Kohezijas politika pec 2013. gada. Ko ta noznne Latvijai?' Zurnals “Lahijas intereses Eiropas SavienTba”, no. 1, pp. 46-56.
• Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Refonned Cohesion Policy, A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent report (Brussels: DG Regio).
• Barca, F. & McCann, P. (2012), ‘The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches/ Journal of Regional Science, vol. 52,no. l,pp. 134-152. http://dx.doi.org.10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x Blizkovsky, P. (2012), Does ‘the Golden Rule’Translate into ‘Golden ’EUEconomic Governance? Policy Brief. Singapore: School of Public Policy.[Crossref]
• Caroleo, F. E. & Pastore, F. (2010), The Labour Market Impact of the Enlargement; Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2164-2_1 Capello, R.; Camagni, R. P.; Chizzolini, P. & Fratesi, U., eds. (2008). Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe: European Competitiveness and Global Strategies, Berlin: Springer.[Crossref]
• Capello, R. & Dentinho, T. P. (2012), Networks, Space and Competitiveness: Evolving Challenges for Sustainable Growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781003671 Chavance, B. (2008). Institutional Economics, London: Routledge. Cooke, B.; Langford. W. T.; Gordon, A. & Bekessy, S. (2012). ‘Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation.' Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 55. no. 4. pp. 469-485. http://dx.doi.org10.1080/09640568.2011.60S549[Crossref]
• Crescenzi. R. & Percoco, M. (2012), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Advances in Spatial Science. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_2 Dale, A.: Dushenko, W. T. & Robinson, P. J. (2012), Urban Sustainability: Reconnecting Space and Place. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.[Crossref]
• Dall’erba, S.; Lira, J.; Tong. D. & Plane, D. (2011), ‘New Perspectives on Regional Development/ Région et développement. vol. 33. pp. 5-8.
• Dawkins, C. J. (2007), ‘Space and the Measurement of Income Segregation.' Journal of Regional Science, vol. 47. no. 2. pp. 255-272. <http://dx.doi.org/10.111L> j. 1467-9787.2007.00508.X Diedrichs, U.; Reiners, W. & W essels, V. (2011), The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Dunleavy. P.; Margetts, H.; Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2006), Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Govemment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• EC (2010), Europe 2020: A European Strategy’for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Communication from the Commission, COM (2010)2020, 03.03.2010, Brussels: European Commission.
• ESPON (2009), ‘ESPON: European Spatial Planning Observation Network. Territorial Observation No. 2/ The ESPON 2013 Programme. Nov 2009. Luxembourg.
• Faludi, A. (2010), Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? Abingdon: Routledge.
• Farole, T.; Rodriguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2011). ‘Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions/ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49. no. 5. pp. 1089-1111. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x Fritsch, M. & Noseleit, F. (2013). ‘Investigating the Anatomy of the Employment Effects of the Business Formation/ Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 2. pp. 349-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes030 Grzeszczak, R. & Karolewski, I. P. (2012), The Multi-Level and Potycetitric European Union: Legal and Political Studies. Munster: LIT Yerlag.
• Hiro, I. (2008). ‘What Does Endogenous Growth Theory Tell about Regional Economies? Empirics of R&D Worker-based Productivity Growth Regional Studies.’ Regional Studies, vol. 42. no. 7. pp. 947-960. http:.'dx.doi.org 10.108000343400701541847[WoS]
• Howitt, P. (2007), Edmund Phelps: Macroeconomist and Social Scientist/ The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 109. no. 2. pp. 203-224.
• Karlson, C.; Johansson, B. & Stough, R. R. (2012), Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Governance: Directions for the Sustainable Development and Competitiveness of Regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781002841[Crossref]
• OECD (2008). ‘Making the Most of Regional Development Policy through Multi-level Governance.' in Territorial Reviews: Poland 200S, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 171-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264049529-5-en [Crossref]
• -(2009), OECD Regions at a Glance, Paris: OECD Publishing.
• McCann, P. (2010), Modern Urban and Regional Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Menard, C. & Shirley, M. (2008). New Institutional Economics: Institutions and Development. Berlin: Springer.
• Mendez, C'.; Bachrler, J. & Wishlade, F. (2011), Visions and Options for Cohesion Policy after 2015, Report to European Parliament. Brussels: European Parliament.
• Molle, W. (2011), Economic Governance in the EU: Implementing Policies with the Financial and Coordination Modes, London: Routledge.
• Muravska, T. (2012), ‘Crisis in Latvia - economic transformation: the regional dimension and development constraints,' in G. Gorzelak. C. Goh & K. Fazekas (eds.) Adaptability’ and Change - the Regional Dimensions in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe "Scholar". pp. 245-268.
• Nijkamp, P. (2011), Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness: Dynamic Regions in the Knowledge-Based World Economy, Advances in Spatial Science, Berlin: Springer.[WoS]
• Olsen, J. P. (2010), Governing Through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Panara, C. & De Backer, A., eds. (2011), The Role of the Regions in theEU Governance, Berlin: Springer http://dx.doi.oig-10.1007/978-3-642-11903-3[Crossref]
• Paulsen, K. (2013). ‘The Effects of Growth Management on the Spatial Extent of Urban Development,' Land Economics, vol. 89. no. 2, pp. 193-210.
• SRDA (2008). Survey 'Trends of Social Economic Development of Towns and Cities of Latvia \ Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
• -(2012), Parskats “Regionu attīstība Latvija 2011” [Survey ‘Development of Regions in Latvia 2011]. Riga: The State Regional Development Agency.
• Prezioso, M. (2008). ‘Is it possible to give the territorial dimension more relevance for choices of competitiveness and sustainability policies?' Transition Studies Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
• Sabel, C. & Zeitlin, J. (2010), ‘Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU.' in C. F. Sabel & J. Zeitlin (eds.) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-28.
• Servillo, L. (2010), ‘Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning,’ Planning Theoiy & Practice, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397-416.
• Solow, R. M. (2000), Growth Theoiy: An Exposition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Stead, D. (2013), ‘Dimensions of territorial governance, ’ Planning Theoiy and Practice, vol. 14.no. l.pp. 142-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.758494 [Crossref]
• Teece, D. (2011), Dynamic Capabilities and Sfrategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Teece, D. & Helfat, C. E. etal. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Str ategic Change in Oiganisations. Oxford & Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Tosics, I. (2011), Governance Challenges and Models for the Cities of Tomorrow. Budapest: Metropolitan Research Institute.
• Vaidere, I.; Yanags. E.; Yanags. I. & Mika, I. (2006). Regionālā politika un pašvaldību attīstība Eiropas Savienībā un Latvija, Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
• Walsh, J. (2013), ‘Remapping the border: geospatial technologies and border activism.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 31. no. 6. pp. 969-987.[WoS]
• Wood, A. & Roberts, S. (2012), Economic Geography: Places, Networks and Flows. Abingdon: Routledge.
• World Bank (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Zouneveld, W.; De Vries, J. & Janssen-Jansen, L„ eds. (2012). European Territorial Governance. Housing and Urban Policy Studies, vol. 35, Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjes-2014-0003