The EU’s Difficulty in Translating Interests into Effective Foreign Policy Action: A Look at the Ukraine Crisis

• Authors: Nicholas Ross Smith
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The EU’s foreign policy response(s) to the unfolding Ukraine crisis has further illustrated its difficulty in making effective foreign policy decisions. Using a neoclassical realist analytical framework, this paper argues that although the EU did have tangible collective interests in pursuing its Ukraine foreign policy, it was unable to adequately filter these through its domestic setting. Three key constraints to the EU’s Ukrainian foreign policy> were identified: decision-makers ’ miscalculations; rigid normative demands; and a reliance on consensus politics. Ultimately, the Ukraine crisis illustrated that the EU, in current incarnation, cannot translate interests into effective foreign policies, even when making policy for their direct neighbourhood.

Keywords

EN

EU foreign policy; neoclassical realism; Ukraine

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 54-68

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-05-17

Contributors

author

Nicholas Ross Smith

• Politics and International Relations, University of Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

References

• Averre, D. (2009). “Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the ‘Shared Neighbourhood’.” Europe-Asia Studies. vol. 61. no. 10. pp. 1689-1713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130903278918 [WoS][Crossref]
• Bressand, A. (2011). ‘Between Kant and Machiavelli: EU foreign policy priorities in the 2010s.' International Affairs, vol. 87. no. 1. pp. 59-85. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1468-2346.2011.00960.x[WoS]
• Brooks, S. G. & Wohlforth, W. C. (2010). World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Casier, T. (2011), “Russia’s Energy Leverage over the EU: Myth or Reality?’' Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol. 12. no. 4. pp. 493-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.622963[Crossref]
• Christou, G. (2010). ‘European Union security logics to the east: the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership,’ European Security. vol. 19. no. 3. pp. 413-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2010.526110[Crossref]
• Copsey, N. & Poinorska, K. (2013), ‘The Influence of Newer Member States in the European Union: The Case of Poland and the Eastern Partnership,’ Europe-Asia Studies. vol. 66. no. 3. pp. 421-443.
• European Commission (2009). EU-Ukraine Association Agenda, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
• - (2013), EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
• European Council (2014), Joint statement on Crimea by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
• Forsberg, T. (2013), ‘ The power of the European Union: What explains the EU's (lack of) influence on Russia?" Politique europeenne. vol. 39. no. 1. pp. 22-42.
• Hamilton. P. (2014). Professor Stephen Walt on the Crisis in Ukraine.' Boston Global Forum. Retrieved from http://bostonglobalforum.org/2014/03/professor-stephen-walt-on-the-crisis-in-ukraine [accessed Apr 2014]
• Hyde-Price, A. (2007), European Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Challenge of Multipolarity, New York: Routledge.
• Keohane, R. & Nye, J. (1973), ‘Power and interdependence,’ Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, vol. 15. no. 4. pp. 158-165.
• Layne, C. (2012). "This Time It's Real: The End ofUmpolarity and the Pax Americana." International Studies Quarterly, vol. 56. no. 1. pp. 203-213. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1468-2478.2011.00704.x[WoS]
• Leonard, M. & Popescu, N. (2007), A Pow er Audit ofEU-Russia Relations, London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
• Petrovic, M. (2013), The Democratic Transition of Post-Communist Europe: In the Shadow of Communist Differences and Uneven EUropeanisation, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, http: dx.doi.org 10.1057/97S1137315359[Crossref]
• Pridham, G. (2005), Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org.10.1057/9780230504905[Crossref][WoS]
• Rose, G. (1998). ‘Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.' World Politics, vol. 51. no. 1. pp. 144-172. http: dx.doi.org 10.1017. S0043S87100007814
• Schweller, R. L. (2004). ‘Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing/ International Security, vol. 29. no. 2, pp. 159-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0162288042/879913[Crossref]
• Sjöstedt, G. (1977), The External Role of the European Community’, Farnborough: Saxon House.
• Thomas, D. (2012), ‘Still Punching below Its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy.' JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 50. no. 3. pp. 457^74.[WoS]
• Toje, A. (2008). " The Consensus-Expectations Gap: Explaining Europe's Ineffective Foreign Policy,” Security Dialogue, vol. 39. no. 1. pp. 121-141. http: Vdx.doi.org 10.1177 0967010607086826 -(2011), ‘The European Union as a Small Power,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49. no. 1. pp. 43-60. http://Vdx.doi.org.10.11/11/j.1468-5965.2010.02128.x
• Toje, A. & Kunz, B. (2012), ‘Introduction: neoclassical realism in Europe.’ in A. Toje and B. Kunz (eds.) Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Whitman, R. G. (2011). Nonna five Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230305601 [Crossref]
• Wolilforth, W. C. (1999). ‘The Stability of a Unipolar World.’ Intejuational Security. vol. 24. no. 1. pp. 5-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228899560031[Crossref]
• Zielonka, J. (2013), “Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 18.no. l.pp. 35-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2013.750172 [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjes-2014-0004