The Significance and Impact of Innovation Networks of Academia and Business with a Special Emphasis on Work-Based Learning

• Authors: Max A. Hogeforster , Elina Priedulena
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Europe 2020 Strategy puts the quality and relevance of education and training systems at the heart of EU’s efforts to improve innovation and competitiveness and to achieve intelligent, sustainable and inclusive growth. The development of partnerships between vocational schools or higher-education institutions and the business sector must be considered as a critical factor in identifying learning requirements, improving the relevance of education and facilitating access to education and learning. The growing lack of skills is one of the major challenges for companies that rely on more highly qualified personnel. To increase the cooperation between academia and the business world means to integrate small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since 99.2 per cent of European businesses are SMEs. They are the blood cells of the European economy and are essential for growth, yet a very heterogeneous group that can only be integrated in cooperation networks by intermediate organisations which tackle the needs of this diverse group of businesses. Such a partnership of 17 universities and polytechnics, including the University of Latvia, was founded in 2010 and is shortly introduced as a best practice example.To stay competitive in the globalised world, companies need to be innovative and that requires cooperation with knowledge institutions. A survey conducted in 2013 revealed that one of the major obstacles for SMEs to improve their innovation capabilities is their inability to find qualified personnel. This corresponds to the huge challenges the labour markets face in Europe. Almost all countries report a growing lack of skilled workforce while at the same time youth unemployment is increasing. This gap between the current qualifications and the qualifications demanded by businesses sector can be overcome by a closer cooperation between enterprises and education facilities, on a national but also international level between Western and Eastern countries. The introduction of work-based education plays a crucial role in narrowing this divide.

Keywords

EN

innovation network; partnership; qualification; SMEs; work-based learning

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 69-82

Dates

published

2014-10-01

online

2014-11-05

Contributors

author

Max A. Hogeforster

• Baltic Sea Academy Blankeneser Landstrasse 7, Hamburg 22587, Germany

author

Elina Priedulena

• Hanse Parlament Blankeneser Landstrasse 7, Hamburg 22587, Germany

References

• Abreu, M.; Grinevich, V.; Hughes, A.; Kitson, M. & Ternouth, P. (2008), Universities, Business and Knowledge Exchange, Council for Industry and Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www3.cardiffmet.ac.uk/English/management/workbasedlearning/CCWL/Documents/Library-Documents/134%20Universities,%20Business%20and%20Knowledge%20Exchange.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Altenburg, T. (2008), “Breakthrough? China’s and India’s Transition from Production to Innovation,” World Development, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.011[WoS][Crossref]
• Baumol, W. J. (2002), The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Biermann, U.; Boll, C.; Reich, N. & Stiller, S. (2013), ‘Economic Perspectives, Qualification and Labour Market Integration of Women in the Baltic Sea Region,’ Baltic Sea Academy Series, vol. 9, pp. 29-35.
• Blossfeld, H. P. (1992), ‘Is the German Dual System a Model for a Modern Vocational Training System? A Cross-national Comparison of How Different Systems of Vocational Training Deal with the Changing Occupational Structure,’ International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 33, nos. 3-4, pp. 168-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002071529203300302[Crossref]
• Cedefop (2014), Cedefop - European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Skill Mismatch: More than Meets the Eye, Briefing Note, March 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/publications/22524.aspx [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. -- (2013), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• de Kok, J.; Vroonhof, P.; Verhoeven, W.; Timmermans, N.; Kwaak, T.; Snijders, J. & Westhof, F. (2011), Do SMEs Create More and Better Jobs, Report prepared by EIM for the European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry, Brussels: European Commission.
• Dessinger, T. (2000), “The German ‘philosophy’ of linking academic and work-based learning in higher education: the case of the ‘vocational academies’,” Journal of Vocational Education and Training, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 605-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13636820000200134[Crossref]
• Eichhorst, W.; Hinte, H. & Rinne, U. (2013), ‘Youth unemployment in Europe: what to do about it?’ Intereconomics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 230-235.
• Enright, M. J.; Fowcs-Williams, I. & Nolan, A. (2001), ‘Local partnership, clusters and SME globalisation. Enhancing SME competitiveness,’ OECD Bologna Ministerial Conference / Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, pp. 115-150.
• European Commission (2011), Report from the commission to the council and the European parliament, Minimizing regulatory burden for SMEs, Adapting EU regulation to the needs of micro-enterprises, COM (2011) 803 final, 23 November 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/governance/better_regulation/documents/minimizing_burden_sme_EN.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Eurostat (2012), Europe in Figures - Eurostat Yearbook 2012: Population, European Commission.
• Gagliardi, D. et al. (2013), A Recovery on the Horizon, Annual report on European SMEs 2012/2013 for the European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/files/supporting-documents/2013/annual-report-smes-2013_en.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Heinonen, J. (2010), ‘Business in the Baltic Sea Region - future perspective,’ Baltic Rim Economies Quarterly Review, vol. 3, p. 46.
• Hogeforster, M. (2014), ‘Future Challenges for Innovations in SMEs in the Baltic Sea Region,’ Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 110, pp. 241-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.867[Crossref]
• Holm, D. B.; Eriksson, K. & Johanson, J. (1996), ‘Business networks and cooperation in international business relationships,’ Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1033-1053.[Crossref]
• Lee, S.; Park, G.; Yoon, B. & Park, J. (2010), ‘Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model,’ Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 290-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009[WoS][Crossref]
• Lester, S. & Costley, C. (2010), ‘Work based learning at higher education level: value, practice and critique,’ Studies in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 561-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070903216635[Crossref]
• Liu, X.; Hodgkinson, I. R. & Chuang, F. M. (2014), ‘Foreign competition, domestic knowledge base and innovation activities: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries,’ Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 414-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.11.005[Crossref][WoS]
• Lukács, E. (2005), ‘The economic role of SMEs in world economy, especially in Europe,’ European Integration Studies, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 3-12.
• Michaelides, R.; Morton, S. C.; Michaelides, Z.; Lyons, A. C. & Liu, W. (2013), ‘Collaboration networks and collaboration tools: a match for SMEs?’ International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2034-2048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.701778 [Crossref]
• Nickolaus, R.; Gschwendtner, T. & Geissel, B. (2009), ‘Social inequality as an enduring phenomenon of general and vocational education - characteristics in the Federal Republic of Germany and international perspectives,’ CEDEFOP European Journal of Vocational Training, vol. 46, no. 1. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/EJVT47_en.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Odenrick, P. (2012), SME relevant sectors in the BSR: Personnel organization, energy and construction, Baltic Sea Academy Series, vol. 5, pp. 9-52.
• Siebert, H. (1997), Labor Market Rigidities and Unemployment in Europe, Kiel Working Papers, no. 787. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/934/1/224916742.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Stiller, S. & Faltermeier, J. (2011), Auswirkungen des demographischen Wandels auf die Arbeitsmärkte im Ostseeraum, Baltic Sea Academy Series: Education Policy Strategies Today and Tomorrow around the “Mare Balticum”, vol. 3, pp. 50-68.
• Street, C. T. & Cameron, A. F. (2007), ‘External relationships and the small business: A review of small business alliance and network research,’ Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 239-266.
• Soriano, F. H. & Mulatero, F. (2010), ‘Knowledge policy in the EU: From the Lisbon strategy to Europe 2020,’ Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 289-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0020-9[Crossref]
• Teichler, U. (2013), ‘Universities Between the Expectations to Generate Professionally Competences and Academic Freedom Experiences from Europe,’ Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 77, pp. 421-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.097[Crossref]
• Tödtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (2001), ‘The role of the region for innovation activities of SMEs,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800303[Crossref]
• Ubarevičienė, R.; Van Ham, M. & Burneika, D. (2014), Shrinking Regions in a Shrinking Country: The Geography of Population Decline in Lithuania 2001-2011, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA) Discussion Paper, no. 8026. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp8026.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• UN World Population Prospects (2010), World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
• Van de Vrande, V.; De Jong, J. P.; Vanhaverbeke, W. & de Rochemont, M. (2009), ‘Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges,’ Technovation, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 423-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001[Crossref]
• Van der Meer, H. (2007), ‘Open innovation - the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models,’ Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 192-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00433.x [Crossref]
• Von Kiedrowski, J. & Schaumann, U. (2011), Duale Bachelor Studiengänge: Konzepte und Erfahrungen der Berufsakademie Hamburg, Baltic Sea Academy Series, vol. 3, pp. 338-348.
• Wymenga, P.; Spanikova, V.; Derbyshire, J. & Barker, A. (2011), Are EU SMEs recovering? Annual Report on EU SMEs 2010/2011 for the European Commission, Rotterdam & Cambridge: Ecorys. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/files/supportingdocuments/2010-2011/annual-report_en.pdf [accessed 10 Jun 2014]
• Zeng, S. X.; Xie, X. M. & Tam, C. M. (2010), ‘Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs,’ Technovation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 181-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003 [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjes-2014-0016