The Rise In Popularity Of The Lithuanian Political Party Drasos Kelias

• Authors: Liudas Mažylis , Ingrida Unikaitė-Jakuntavičienė , Bernaras Ivanovas
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article examines the genesis of a new Lithuanian political unit, the Drasos kelias party, which was created in 2012 and successfully participated in the 2012 Lithuanian parliamentary elections, reconstructing it in three stages based on the analysis of news portals. Reconstruction of the first stage is based on the competing “conspiracy versions” (two different interpretations of the unsolved criminal story in the news media) in 2009- 2010. Two archetypal characters (criminal and/or hero) were sought in the interpretation of the two aforementioned versions. Agenda setting and media framing theories were used as explanatory theories. The second stage (2011-2012) is reconstructed through further analysis of the news portals as well as through the analysis of some additional research from the interviews and focus group discussions. This data allowed us to retrace the logic of collective thinking. This logic of collective thinking contributed to the formation of a continuous “single issue” protest community which was united by the slogan “do not hand the child to a paedophilia clan”. This group of people constantly hindered the governmental institutions from the implementation of the court decision to hand the child to her mother, and over a long period of time its protest arguments expanded from “not handing the child to her mother” to protests against the entire Lithuanian legal system. Further, the third stage associated with formal institutionalization of political party and its rising of popularity among the voters in the 2012 Lithuanian parliamentary elections is analyzed. The analysis stresses the importance of social and personal networks for the regional dispersion of party election results.

Keywords

EN

Political party; elections; ‘single issue’ political party; collective thinking; institutionalization of political party

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 63-88

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-09-05

Contributors

author

Liudas Mažylis

• Professor; Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

author

Ingrida Unikaitė-Jakuntavičienė

• Associate Professor; Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

author

Bernaras Ivanovas

• Associate Professor; Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

References

• 1. Bell, Stephen. “Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?” British Journal of Political Science Volume 41, No. 04 (October 2011): 883-906 // DOI: 10.1017/S0007123411000147.[Crossref]
• 2. Bruveris, Vytautas. “Drąsiųjų keliai - į priešingas puses.” lrytas.lt (2012-11-29) // http://www.lrytas.lt/-13541673451353999707- dr%C4%85si%C5%B3j%C5%B3-keliai-%C4%AF-prie%C5%A1ingaspuses. htm (accessed December 30, 2012).
• 3. Bučnys, Artūras, and Gintaras Žilinskas. “Teisminė valdžia”: 472-473. In: Algis Krupavičius and Alvidas Lukošaitis, eds. Lietuvos politinė sistema. Sąranga ir raida. Vilnius: Poligrafija ir informatika, 2004.
• 4. Cohen, Bernard. The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.
• 5. “D. Kuolio partijos paramą kai kuriems ‘Drąsos kelio’ kandidatams vadovybė vadina ‘neetišku kišimusi’.” delfi.lt (2012-08-31) // http://www.delfi.lt/archive/dkuolio-partijos-parama-kai-kuriems-drasos-keliokandidatams- vadovybe-vadina-neetisku-kisimusi.d?id=59422575 (accessed September 25, 2012).
• 6. “‘Drasos kelias’ politines partijos rinkimu programa” (The election manifesto of the political party ‘Drąsos kelias’) (2012) // http://www.dkpartija.lt/partijos-programa/rinkimuprograma2012/ (accessed November 25, 2012).
• 7. “‘Drąsos kelio’ partija palaikys A. Butkevičių.” lrytas.lt (2012-11-02) // http://www.lrytas.lt/-13535043961351189469-dr%C4%85sos-kelio-partijapalaikys- a-butkevi%C4%8Di%C5%B3.htm (accessed December 15, 2012).
• 8. Entman, Robert M. “Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4) (1993): 51-58.
• 9. Entman, Robert M. “Framing U.S. coverage of International news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents.” Journal of Communication 41 (4) (1991): 6-27.
• 10. Ezrow, Lawrence. Linking Citizens and Parties: How Electoral Systems Matterfor Electoral Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
• 11. Hay, Calin. “From Historian to Constructivist Institutionalism”: 57-63. In: R.A.W. Rhodes, S.A. Binder, and B. Rockman, eds. The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Institutions. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford University Press, 2008.
• 12. Hester, Joe Bob, and Rhonda Gibson. “The Agenda-Setting Function of National Versus Local Media: A Time-Series Analysis for the Issue of Same- Sex Marriage.” Mass Communication and Society 10:3 (2007): 299-317.
• 13. International Election Observation Mission. “Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions.” Parliamentary Election, Republic of Moldova (April 5, 2009) // http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/moldova/36823 (accessed October 10, 2012).
• 14. Jovaišas, Karolis. “Kada bus užsakytos mišios už ‘Drąsos kelią’?” delfi.lt (2012-10-17) // http://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/lit/kjovaisas-kada-busuzsakytos- misios-uz-drasos-kelia.d?id=59780143#ixzz2GkEVDF1O (accessed December 6, 2012)
• 15. Krupavičius, Algis, and Alvidas Lukošaitis. Lietuvos politinė sistema. Sarangair raida. Kaunas: Poligrafija ir informatika, 2004.
• 16. Kuznecovaitė, Asta. “A. Ūso bylos teisėjas A. Cininas: ‘Tai yra absoliuti reabilitacija’.” lrytas.lt (2012-11-30) // http://www.lrytas.lt/-13542801221352809306-a-%C5%ABso-bylos-teis%C4%97jas-a-cininas-taiyra- absoliuti-reabilitacija.htm (accessed December 10, 2012).
• 17. “Laiko ženklai.” Lietuvos rytas Nr. 283 (6646) (2012-12-04).
• 18. Lapinskas, Anatolijus. “Reakcijos į D. Kedžio bylą: nuo atgimimo iki ... išsigimimo.” delfi.lt (2012-04-24) // http://www.delfi.lt/news/ringas/lit/alapinskas-reakcijos-i-dkedzio-byla-nuoatgimimo- iki-issigimimo.d?id=58441740 (accessed November 30, 2012).
• 19. Lee, Gan Heong. “Reconciling cognitive priming vs. obtrusive contingency hypotheses.” Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies 66 (2004): 151-167.
• 20. Lepper, Andrzej. “Ogólne postulaty ideowo-programowe Samoobrony” // http://www.samoobrona.org.pl/pages/02.Partia/02.Program/index.php?docu ment=02.postul.html (accessed October 10, 2012).
• 21. Lijphard, Arend, and Grofman Bernard. Electoral Laws & Their PoliticalConsequences. New York: Algora Publishing, 2003.
• 22. Lippman, Walter. Public opinion. New York: Free Press Paperbacks, 1997.
• 23. “Luisai Rinau likti Lietuvoje - vis mažiau vilčių,” delfi.lt (2008-03-21) // http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/law/luisai-rinau-likti-lietuvoje-vis-maziauvilciu. d?id=16413800 (accessed October 11, 2012).
• 24. Mažylis, Liudas, and Aušrinė Jurgelionytė. “The Lithuanian Referendum on Extending the Working of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Station: The Rationality of Actors within (Un-)Changing Structures.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 5:1 (2012): 117-136.
• 25. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. “The agenda-setting function of mass media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (1972): 176-187.
• 26. McQuail, Denis. Mass Communication Theory: an introduction. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
• 27. Nagle, John D., and Mahr, Alison. Democracy and Democratization. London. SAGE Publications, 1999.
• 28. “Neringa Venckienė: siektume teismų ir prokuratūros reformos.” delfi.lt (2012-10-14) // http://tv.delfi.lt/video/6NPHbpMm/ (accessed October 20, 2012).
• 29. “Panevėžio apygardos teismas atsisakė priimti N. Venckienės prašymą stabdyti L. Stankūnaitės ir D. Kedžio dukros perdavimą motinai.” lrytas.lt (2011-12-23) // http://m.lrytas.lt/-13246322331324626153- panev%C4%97%C5%BEio-apygardos-teismas-atsisak%C4%97-priimti-nvenckien% C4%97s-pra%C5%A1ym%C4%85-stabdyti-lstank% C5%ABnait%C4%97s-ir-d-ked%C5%BEio-dukros-perdavim%C4%85- motinai.htm (accessed December 10, 2012).
• 30. Pilsudska, Inna. “Civil Society, Public Information and Media” // http://www.globalintegrity.org/reports/2004/2004/countryb506.html?cc=ua& act=ia (accessed September 12, 2009).
• 31. Povilaitis, Nerijus. “M.Milinienė: mano sūnų nužudę žmonės gali kėsintis ir į mane.” lrytas.lt (2012-12-27) // http://www.lrytas.lt/lietuvosdiena/ kriminalai/m-miliniene-mano-sunu-ir-a-usa-nuzude-zmones-galikesintis- ir-i-mane.htm (accessed December 29, 2012).
• 32. “Prokurorai nesako, kada kreipsis dėl N. Venckienės neliečiamybės panaikinimo.” delfi.lt (2012-12-20) // http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/lithuania/prokurorai-nesako-kada-kreipsis-delnvenckienes- nelieciamybes-panaikinimo.d?id=60279301 (accessed December 21, 2012).
• 33. Riekašius, Remigijus. “Politinis dalyvavimas”: 213-242. In: Algis Krupavičius and Alvidas Lukošaitis, eds. Lietuvos politinė sistema. Sąranga ir raida. Vilnius: Poligrafija ir informatika, 2004.
• 34. Sanders, Karen. Communicating Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• 35. Schmidt, Vivien A. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science Vol. 11 (June 2008): 303-326 // DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.[WoS][Crossref]
• 36. Schmitter, Phillippe, and Guillermo O'Donnell. Transitions from AuthoritarianRule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Vol. IV. Baltimore/London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
• 37. The World Bank. The Communication for Governance and AccountabilityProgram (CommGAP) ‘TheMedia effects’ // http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTGOVACC/Resources/MediaEffectsweb.p df (accessed December 11, 2012).
• 38. Thelen, Kathleen. “Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science No. 2 (1999): 369-404.
• 39. Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform. “UDAR elects faction’s leadership in parliament.” Kiyv Post (2012-12-12) // http://www.kyivpost.com/content/politics/udar-elects-factions-leadership-inparliament-317537.html (accessed December 20, 2012).
• 40. Wagner, Markus. “Defining and measuring niche parties.” Party Politics Vol. 18, No. 6 (November 2012): 845-864.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjlp-2013-0004