European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature

• Authors: Jan Kubeš
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Over 180 articles concerning urban geography aspects of European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland, published between 1990-2012 in international journals, were selected for the analysis in this paper. Statistics of articles by journals, analysed cities (and their countries) and authors proves the preponderance of research on post-socialist Central European capitals, especially Berlin, Prague and Budapest, followed by Leipzig and Łodź, as well as Moscow and Tallinn. It also proves that the number of domestic authors and those who moved from post-socialist Europe to Western universities gradually increased, while the number of authors from the West decreased. The analysis of representations of article topics, their explanations and justifications were carried out in the second part of the paper. The most frequent article topics include ‘social spatial structure of the city and its transformation’, followed by ‘urban planning and management in the city’ and ’suburbanisation and urban sprawl in the near hinterland of the city’. A smaller number of articles refers to ‘physical spatial structure of the city and its transformation’, ‘housing structure in urban neighbourhoods in connection with changes in housing policy and market’ and ‘functional spatial structure of the city and its transformation’. Indexes of the articles are part of this paper

Keywords

EN

post-socialist city; urban literature; city spatial structure; urban geography

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 19-43

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-02-26

Contributors

author

Jan Kubeš

• University of South Bohemia, Department of Geography, Jeronýmova 10, 371 15 České Budějovice, The Czech Republic, phone: + 420 387 773 098, fax: + 420 387 312 194

References

• Ahas, R., Aasa, A., Silm, S. and Tiru, M., 2010: Daily rhythms of suburban commuters’ movements in the Tallinn metropolitan area: case study with mobile positioning data. In: Transportation Research Part C, 18 (1), pp. 45-54.
• Alden, J., Beigulenko, Y. and Crow, S., 1998: Moscow: Planning for a world capital city towards 2000. In: Cities, 15 (5), pp. 361‒374.[Crossref]
• Altrock, U., Gunter, S., Huning, S. and Peters, D. eds., 2006: Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states. From adjustment to reinvention, Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Andrusz, G.D., Harloe, M. and Szelenyi, I. eds., 1996: Cities after socialism: urban and regional change and conflict in postsocialist societies, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Argenbright, R., 2011: New Moscow: An exploratory assessment. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52 (6), pp. 857‒875.[Crossref]
• Badyina, A. and Golubchikov, O., 2005: Gentrification in central Moscow - A market process or a deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regeneration in Ostozhenka. In: Geografiska Annaler: Series B,Human Geography, 87 (2), pp.113‒129.[Crossref]
• Bater, J.H., 1994: Housing developments in Moscov in the 1990s. In: Post-Soviet Geography, 35 (6), pp. 309‒328.
• Bater, J.H., 2001: Adjusting to change: privilege and place in post-Soviet Central Moscow. In: Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe canadien, 45 (2), pp. 237‒251.[Crossref]
• Bater, J.H., 2006: Central St. Petersburg: Continuity and change in privilege and place. In: Eurasian Geographyand Economics, 47 (1), pp. 4‒27.
• Bater, J.H., Amelin, V.N. and Degtyarev, A.A., 1994: Moscow in the 1990s - Market reform and the central city. In: Post-Soviet Geography, 35 (5), pp. 247‒266.
• Bater, J.H., Degtyarev, A.A. and Amelin, V.N., 1995: Politics in Moscow: local issues, areas, and governance. In: Political Geography, 14 (8), pp. 665‒687.[Crossref]
• Beluszky, P. and Timar, J., 1992: The changing political system and urban restructuring in Hungary. In: Tijdschriftvoor economische en sociale geografie, 83 (5), pp. 380‒389.
• Bernt, M., 2009: Partnerships for demolition: The governance of urban renewal in East Germany‘s shrinking cities. In: International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 33 (3), pp. 754‒769.
• Bodnar, J. and Molnar, V., 2010: Reconfiguring private and public: State, capital and new housing developments in Berlin and Budapest. In: Urban Studies, 47 (4), pp. 789‒812.[Crossref]
• Bollens, SA, 2008: Urbanism, political uncertainty and democratisation. In: Urban Studies, 45 (5‒6), pp. 1255‒1289.[Crossref]
• Boren, T. and Gentile, M., 2007: Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: an introduction. In: GeografiskaAnnaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89 (2), pp. 95‒110.
• Bouzarovski, S., 2009: Building events in inner-city Gdańsk, Poland: exploring the sociospatial construction of agency in built form. In: Environment and PlanningD: Society and Space, 27 (5), pp. 840‒858.
• Bouzarovski, S., 2011: City profile: Skopje. In: Cities, 28 (3), pp. 265‒277.[Crossref]
• Bouzarovski, S., Salukvadze, J. and Gentile, M., 2011: A socially resilient urban transition? The contested landscapes of apartment building extensions in two post-communist cities. In: Urban Studies, 48 (13), pp. 2689‒2714.[Crossref]
• Brade, I., Herfert, G. and Wiest, K., 2009: Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? In: Cities, 26 (5), pp. 233‒244.[Crossref]
• Brade, I. and Rudolph, R., 2004: Moscow, the global city? The position of the Russian capital within the European system of metropolitan areas. In: Area, 36 (1), pp. 69‒80.[Crossref]
• Brown, D.L. and Schafft, K.A., 2002: Population deconcentration in Hungary during the post-socialist tranformation. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 18 (3), pp. 233‒244.[Crossref]
• Buček, J., 2000: Sublocal decentralisation - the case of Slovak big cities. In: Environment and Planning C: Governmentand Policy, 18 (1), pp. 57‒78.
• Buzar (Bouzarovski), S., Ogden, P.E., Hall, R., Haase,A., Kabisch, S. and Steinfuhrer, A., 2007: Splintering urban populations: Emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four European cities. In: Urban Studies, 44 (4‒6), pp. 651‒677.[Crossref]
• Cochrane, A. and Jonas, A., 1999: Reimagining Berlin. In: European Urban and Regional Studies, 6 (2), pp. 145‒164.[Crossref]
• Cochrane, A. and Passmore, A., 2001: Building a national capital in an age of globalization: the case of Berlin. In: Area, 33 (4), pp. 341‒352.[Crossref]
• Cook, A., 2010: The expatriate real estate komplex: creative destruction and the production of luxusy in postsocialist Prague. In: International Journal of Urban andRegional Research, 34 (3), pp. 611‒628.
• Couch, C., Karecha, J., Nuissl, H. and Rink, D., 2005: Decline and sprawl: An evolving type of urban development - Observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. In: EuropeanPlanning Studies, 13 (1), pp. 117‒136.
• Csefalvay, Z., 2011: Gated communities for security or prestige? A public choice approach and the case of Budapest. In: International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 35 (4), pp. 735‒752.
• Dawidson, K.E.K., 2004a: Redistributing nationalised housing: impact on property patterns in Timisoara, Romania. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45 (2), pp. 134‒156.[Crossref]
• Dawidson, K.E.K., 2004b: Conflits of interest in the restitution and privatisation of housing since the fall of socialism: The case of central Timisoara City - a problem of democracy? In: Europe-Asia Studies, 56 (l), pp. 119‒141.
• Dingsdale, A., 1999: Budapest’s built environment in transition. In: GeoJournal, 49 (1), pp. 63-78.[Crossref]
• Dołzbłasz, S. and Raczyk, A., 2012: Transborder openness of companies in a divided city: Zgorzelec/Gorlitz case study. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 103 (3), pp. 347‒361.
• Eckardt, F. and Hassenpflug, D. eds., 2005: Paths of urban transformation (European city in transition), New York & Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang Publishing.
• Ellger, C., 1992: Berlin: legacies of division and problems of unification. In: Geographical Journal, 158 (1), pp. 40‒46.[Crossref]
• Ellger, C., 1994: Business service supply and economic transformation - Cottbus, Brandenburg. In: Tijdschriftvoor economische en sociale geografie, 85 (4), pp. 343‒353.
• Elter, I. and Baross, P., 1993: City profile: Budapest. In: Cities, 10 (3), pp. 189‒197.[Crossref]
• Enyedi, G., 1990: Specific urbanization in East-Central Europe. In: Geoforum, 21 (2), pp. 163‒172.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Enyedi, G., 1992: Urbanisation in East Central Europe: social processes and societal responses in the state socialist system. In: Urban Studies, 29 (6), pp. 869‒880.[Crossref]
• Enyedi, G. ed., 1998: Social change and urban restructuring in Central Europe, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
• Feldman, M., 2000: Urban waterfront regeneration and local govenance in Tallinn. In: Europe-Asia Studies, 52 (5), pp. 829‒850.
• Gentile, M. and Sjoberg, O., 2006: Intra-urban landscapes of priority: the Soviet legacy. In: Europe-Asia Studies, 58 (5), pp. 701‒729.
• Gentile, M. and Sjoberg, O., 2010: Spaces of priority: the gography of Soviet housing construction in Daugavpils, Latvia. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (1), pp. 112‒136.[Crossref]
• Gentile, M., Tammaru, T. and van Kempen, R., 2012: Heteropolitanization: Social and spatial change in Central and East European Cities. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 291‒299.[Crossref]
• Glock, B. and Haussermann, H., 2004: New trends in urban development and public policy in Eastern Germany: Dealing with the vacant housing problem at the local level. In: International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 28 (4), pp. 919‒929.
• Golubchikov, O., 2004: Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. In: European Planning Studies, 12 (2), pp. 229-247.[Crossref]
• Golubchikov, O., 2010: World-city-entrepreneurialism: globalist imaginaries, neoliberal geograpies, and the production of new St Petersburg. In: Environment andPlanning A, 42 (3), pp. 626‒643.
• Golubchikov, O. and Phelps, N.A., 2011: The political economy of place at the post-socialist urban periphery: Governing growth on the edge of Moscow. In: Transactionsof the Institute of British Geographers, 36 (3), pp. 425-440.
• Grava, S., 1993: The urban heritage of the Soviet regime: The case of Riga, Latvia. In: Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association, 59 (1), pp. 9‒30.
• Gritsai, O., 1997: Moscow under globalisation and transition: paths of economics restructuring. In: Urban Geography, 18 (2), pp. 155‒165.[Crossref]
• Gritsai, O., 2004: Global business services in Moscow: Patterns of involvement. In: Urban Studies, 41 (10), pp. 2001‒2024.[Crossref]
• Haase, A., Kabisch, S., Steinfuhrer, A., Bouzarovski, S.,Hall, R. and Ogden, P., 2010: Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in European setting. In: Population, Space and Place, 16 (5), pp. 443‒463.
• Haase, A., Grossmann, K. and Steinfuhrer, A., 2012: Transitory urbanites: New actors of residential change in Polish and Czech inner cities. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 318‒326.[Crossref]
• Haase, A., Herfert, G., Kabisch, S. and Steinfuhrer, A., 2012: Reurbanizing Leipzig (Germany): Context conditions and residential actors (2000‒2007). In: EuropeanPlanning Studies, 20 (7), pp. 1173‒1196.
• Haase, A., Steinfuhrer, A., Kabisch, S., Grossmann,K. and Hall, R. eds., 2011: Residential change and demographic challenge. The inner city of East Central Europe in the 21st century, Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate.
• Haase, D., Haase, A., Kabisch, S. and Bischoff, P., 2008: Guidelines for the ‘perfect inner city’. Discussing the appropriateness of monitoring approaches for reurbanization. In: European Planning Studies, 16 (8), pp. 1075‒1100.[Crossref]
• Haase, D. and Nuissl, H., 2007: Does urban sprawl drive chages in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870‒2003. In: Landscape and UrbanPlanning, 80 (1‒2), pp. 1‒13.
• Hamilton, F.E.I., Dimitrowska Andrews, K. and Pichler-Milanović (Pichler-Milanovich), N. eds., 2005: Transformation of cities in Central and Eastern Europe - towards globalization, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
• Hammersley, R. and Westlake, T., 1996: Planning in the Prague region: Past, present and future. In: Cities, 13 (4), pp. 247‒256.[Crossref]
• Hauswirth, I., Herrschel, T. and Newman, P., 2003: Incentives and desincetives to city- regional cooperation in the Berlin-Brandenburg conurbation. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 10 (2), pp. 119‒134.
• Hegedus, J. and Tosics, I., 1994: Privazization and rehabilitation in the Budapest inner districts. In: HousingStudies, 9 (1), pp. 39‒54.
• Hess, D.B., Tammaru, T. and Leetmaa, K., 2012: Ethnic differences in housing in post-Soviet Tartu, Estonia. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 327-333.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S., 2006: Post-socialist urban forms: notes from Sofia. In: Urban Geography, 27 (5), pp. 464‒488.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S., 2007: Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. In: Urban Geography, 28 (8), pp. 755‒780.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S., 2008a: Stuck in the suburbs? Gendered perspectives on living at the edge of the post-communist city. In: Cities, 25 (6), pp. 340‒354.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S., 2008b: Landscapes of postmodernity: Changes in the built fabric of Belgrade and Sofia since the end of socialism. In: Urban Geography, 29 (8), pp. 785‒810.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S., 2009: City profile: Belgrade, Serbia. In: Cities, 26 (5), pp. 293‒303.[Crossref]
• Hirt, S. and Petrović, M., 2011: The Belgrade wall: The proliferation of gated housing in the Serbian capital after socialism. In: International Journal of Urban andRegional Research, 35 (4), pp.753‒777.
• Hirt, S. and Stanilov, K., 2009: Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, 1989‒2009, Nairobi: Human Settlements Global Dialogue Series, UN Habitat.
• Hoffman, L.M., 1994: After the fall - crisis and renewal in urban-planning in the Czech Republic. In: InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 18 (4), pp. 691‒702.
• Holm, A. and Kuhn, A., 2011: Squatting and urban renewal: The interaction of squatter movements and strategies of urban restructuring in Berlin. In: International Journalof Urban and Regional Research, 35 (3), pp. 644‒658.
• Ioffe, G. and Nefedova, T., 1998: Environs of Russian cities: A case study of Moscow. In: Europe-Asia Studies, 50 (8), pp. 1325‒1356.
• Ioffe, G. and Zayonchkovskaya, Z., 2011: Spatial shifts in the population of Moscow Region. In: Eurasian Geographyand Economics, 52 (4), pp. 543‒566.
• Jurgens, U., 1996: City profile: Leipzig. In: Cities, 13 (1), pp. 37‒43.[Crossref]
• Kabisch, N., Haase, D. and Haase, A., 2010: Evolving reurbanisation? Spatio-temporal dynamics as exemplified by East German City of Leipzig. In: Urban Studies, 47 (5), pp. 967‒990.[Crossref]
• Kauko, T., 2009: Policy impact and house price development at the neigbourhood-level - a comparison of four urban regeneration areas using the concept of ‘artificial’ value creation. In: European Planning Studies, 17 (1), pp. 85‒107.[Crossref]
• Kahrik, A. and Tammaru, T., 2008: Population composition in new suburban settlements of the Tallinn metropolitan area. In: Urban Studies, 45 (5‒6), pp. 1055‒1078.[Crossref]
• Kahrik, A. and Tammaru, T., 2010: Soviet prefabricated panel housing estates: areas of continued soical mix or decline? The case of Tallinn. In: Housing Studies, 25 (2), pp. 201‒219.[Crossref]
• Kahrik, A., Leetmaa, K. and Tammaru, T. 2012: Residential decision-making and satisfaction among new suburbanites in the Tallinn urban region, Estonia. In: Cities, 29 (1), pp. 49‒58.[Crossref]
• Keivani, R., Parsa, A. and McGreal, S., 2001: Globalisation, institutional structures and real estate markets in Central European cities. In: Urban Studies, 38 (13), pp. 2457‒2476.[Crossref]
• Keivani, R., Parsa, A. and McGreal, S., 2002: Institutions and urban change in a globalising world: The case of Warsaw. In: Cities, 19 (3), pp.183‒193.[Crossref]
• Kemper, F.J., 1998: Restructuring of housing and ethnic segregation: Recent developments in Berlin. In: UrbanStudies, 35 (10), pp. 1765‒1789.
• Kiss, E., 2002: Restructuring in the industrial areas of Budapest in the period of transition. In: Urban Studies, 39 (1), pp. 69‒84.[Crossref]
• Kiss, E., 2004: Spatial impacts of post-socialist industrial transformation in the major Hungarian cities. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 11 (1), pp. 81‒87.
• Kolossov, V., Vendina, O. and O’Loughlin, J., 2002: Moscow as an emergent world city: international links, business, developments, and the entrepreneurial city. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43 (3), pp. 170‒196.[Crossref]
• Kontuly, T. and Tammaru, T., 2006: Population subgroups responsible for new urbanization and suburbanization in Estonia. In: European Urban and Regional Studie, 13 (4), pp. 319‒336.
• Kotus, J., 2006: Changes in the spatial structure of a large Polish city - The case of Poznań. In: Cities, 23 (5), pp. 364‒381.[Crossref]
• Kotus, J. and Hlawka, B., 2010: Urban neigbourhood communities organised on-line - A new form of self-organisation in the Polish city? In: Cities, 27 (4), pp. 204‒214.[Crossref]
• Kovacs, Z., 1994: A city at the crossroads: Social and economic transformation in Budapest. In: Urban Studies, 31 (7), pp. 1081‒1096.[Crossref]
• Kovacs, Z., 1999: Cities from state-socialism to global capitalism: an introduction. In: GeoJournal, 49 (1), pp. 1-6.[Crossref]
• Kovacs, Z., 2009: Social and economic transformation of historical neighbourhoods in Budapest. In: Tijdschriftvoor economische en sociale geografie, 100 (4), pp. 399‒416.
• Kovacs, Z. and Herfert, G., 2012: Development Pathways of Large Housing Estates in Post-socialist Cities: An International Comparison. In: Housing Studies, 27 (3), pp. 324‒342.[Crossref]
• Kovacs, Z., Wiessner, R. and Zischner, R., 2012. Urban renewal in the inner city of Budapest: Gentrification from a post-socialist perspective. In: Urban Studies, Doi: 10.1177/0042098012453856 Kratke, S., 2000: Berlin: The metropolis as a production space. In: European Planning Studies, 8 (1), pp. 7‒27.[Crossref]
• Kratke, S., 2001: Berlin: Towards a global city? In: UrbanStudies, 38 (10), pp. 1777‒1799.
• Kratke, S., 2004: City of talents? Berlin’s regional economy, socio-spatial fabric and „worst practice“ urban governance. In: International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 28 (3), pp. 511‒529.
• Krišjāne, Z. and Bērzinš, M., 2012: Post-socialist urban trends: New patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Riga, Latvia. In: Urban Studies, 49 (2), pp. 289-306.[Crossref]
• Krišjāne, Z., Bērzinš, M., Ivlevs, A. and Bauls, A., 2012: Who are the typical commuters in the post-socialist metropolis? The case of Riga, Latvia. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 334-340.[Crossref]
• Kulu, H., 2003: Housing differences in the late Soviet city: The case of Tartu, Estonia. In: International Journal ofUrban and Regional Research, 27 (4), pp. 897‒911.
• Ladanyi, J., 1993: Patterns of residential segragation and the Gypsy minority in Budapest. In: International Journalof Urban and Regional Research, 17 (1), pp. 30‒41.
• Latham, A. and McCormack, D.P., 2009: Thinking with images in non-representational cities: vignettes from Berlin. In: Area, 41 (3), pp. 252‒262.[Crossref]
• Leetmaa, K., Brade, I., Anniste, K. and Nuga, N., 2012: Socialist summer-home settlements in post-socialist suburbanisation. In: Urban Studies, 49 (1), pp. 3‒21.[Crossref]
• Leetmaa, K. and Tammaru, T., 2007: Suburbanization in countries in transition: destination of suburubanizers in the Tallinn Metropolitan Area. In: Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography, 89 (2), pp. 127‒146.[Crossref]
• Leetmaa, K., Tammaru, T. and Anniste, K., 2009: From priority-led to market-led suburbanisation in a postcommunist metropolis. In: Tijdschrift voor economischeen sociale geografie, 100 (4), pp.436‒453.
• Lehmann, S.G. and Ruble, B.A., 1997: From “Soviet” to “European” Yaroslavl’: Changing neighbourhood structure in post-Soviet Russian cities. In: Urban Studies, 34 (7), pp. 1085‒1107.[Crossref]
• Levine, M.A., 2004: Government policy, the social state, and gentrification: the case of Prenzlauer Berg (Berlin), Germany. In: Journal of Urban Affairs, 26 (1), pp. 89‒108.[Crossref]
• Lisowski, A. and Wilk, W., 2002: The changing spatial distribution of services in Warsaw. In: European Urbanand Regional Studies, 9 (1), pp. 81‒89.
• Marcińczak, S., 2012: The evolution of spatial patterns of residential segregation in Central European Cities: The Łodź Functional Urban Region from mature socialism to mature post socialism. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 300‒309.[Crossref]
• Marcińczak, S., Musterd, S. and Stępniak, M., 2012: Where the grass is greener: social segregation in three major Polish cities at the beginning of the 21st century. In: European Urban and Regional Studies, 19 (4), pp. 383‒403.
• Marcińczak, S. and Sagan, I. 2011: The socio-spatial restructuring of Łodź, Poland. In: Urban Studies, 48 (9), pp. 1789‒1809.[Crossref]
• Marcuse, P., 1998: Reflections on Berlin: The meaning of construction and the construction of meaning. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22 (2), pp. 331‒338.[Crossref]
• Mieszkowska, K., 1996: City profile: Szczecin. In: Cities, 13 (2), pp. 109‒116.[Crossref]
• Mitchneck, B., 1998: The heritage industry Russian style - The case of Yaroslavl‘. In: Urban Affairs Review, 34 (1), pp. 28‒51.[Crossref]
• Mozolin, M., 1994: The geography of housing values in the transformation to a market economy: a case study of Moscow. In: Urban Geography, 15 (2), pp. 107‒127.[Crossref]
• Musil, J., 1993: Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe: analysis and prediction. In: Urban Studies, 30 (6), pp. 899‒905.[Crossref]
• Nae, M. and Turnock, D. 2011: City profile: The new Bucharest: Two decades of restructuring. In: Cities, 28 (2), pp. 206‒219.[Crossref]
• Nagy, E., 2001: Winners and losers in the transformation of city centre retailing in East Central Europe. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 8 (4), pp. 340‒348.
• Nase, I. and Ocakci, M., 2010: Urban pattern dichotomy in Tirana: Socio-spatial impact of liberalism. In: EuropeanPlanning Studies, 18 (11), pp. 1837‒1861.
• Nedović-Budić, Z., 2001: Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. In: Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (1), pp. 38‒52.[Crossref]
• Nedović-Budić, Z., Djordjević, D. and Dabović, T., 2011: The mornings after…. Serbian spatial planning legislation in context. In: European Planning Studies, 19 (3), pp. 429‒455.[Crossref]
• Niemczyk, M., 1998: City profile - Warsaw (Warszawa). In: Cities, 15 (4), pp. 301‒311.[Crossref]
• Nientied, P., 1998: The question of town and regional planning in Albania. In: Habitat International, 22 (1), pp. 41‒47.[Crossref]
• Novak, J. and Sykora, L., 2007: City in motion: Time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and structuration of spatial organisation in Praque Metropolitan Area. In: Geografiska Annaler: Series B,Human Geography, 89 (2), pp.147‒168.[Crossref]
• Nuissl, H. and Rink, D., 2005: The „production“ of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of postsocialist transformation. In: Cities, 22 (2), pp. 123‒134.[Crossref]
• O’Loughlin, J. and Kolossov, V., 2002: Moscow: Post-Soviet development and challenges. In: Euroasian Geographyand Economics, 43 (3), pp. 161‒169.
• O’Neill, B., 2010: Down and then out in Bucharest: urban poverty, governance and the politics of place in the postsocialist city. In: Environment and Planning D:Societyand Space, 28 (2), pp. 254‒269.
• Ott, T., 2001: From concentration to de-concentration migration patterns in the post-socialist city. In: Cities, 18 (6), pp. 403‒412.[Crossref]
• Ouředniček, M., 2007: Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. In: Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography, 89 (2), pp. 111‒126.[Crossref]
• Owen, J.C., 1994: City government in Plock. An emerging urban regime in Poland. In: Journal of Urban Affairs, 16 (1), pp. 67‒80.[Crossref]
• Pagonis, T. and Thornley, A., 2000: Urban development projects in Moscow: market/state relations in the new Russia. In: European Planning Studies, 8 (6), pp. 751‒766.[Crossref]
• Parysek, J.J. and Mierzejewska, L., 2006: City profile: Poznań. In: Cities, 23 (4), pp. 291-305.[Crossref]
• Parysek, J.J. and Wdowicka, M., 2002: Polish socio-economic transformation: winners and losers at the local level. In: European Urban and Regional Studies, 9 (1), pp. 73‒80.[Crossref]
• Pavlovskaya, M., 2004: Other transitions: multiple economies of Moscow households in the 1990s. In: Annalsof the Association of American Geographers, 94 (2), pp. 329‒351.
• Pavlovskaya, M. and Hanson, S., 2001: Privatisation of the urban fabric: gender and local geographies of transition in downtown Moscow. In: Urban Geography, 22 (1), pp. 4‒28.[Crossref]
• Petrovici, N., 2012: Workers and the city: Rethinking the geographies of power in post-socialist urbanisation. In: Urban Studies, 49 (11), pp. 2377‒2397.[Crossref]
• Pichler-Milanovich (Pichler-Milanović), N., 1994: The role of housing policy in the transformation process of Central-East European cities. In: Urban Studies, 31 (7), pp. 1097‒1115.[Crossref]
• Pickvance, C.G., 1994: Housing privatization and housing protest in the transition from state socialism - a comparative study of Budapest and Moscow. In: InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 18 (3), pp. 433‒450.
• Pojani, D., 2010: City profile: Tirana. In: Cities, 27 (6), pp. 483‒495.[Crossref]
• Pojani, D. 2011: Urban and suburban retail development in Albania’s capital after socialism. In: Land Use Policy, 28 (4), pp. 836‒845.[Crossref]
• Polanska, D., 2008: Decline and revitalization in postcommunist urban context: A case of the Polish city - Gdańsk. In: Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41 (3), pp. 359‒374.
• Reimann, B., 1997: The transition from people’s property to private property - Consequences of the restitution principle for urban development and urban renewal in East Berlin’s inner-city residential areas. In: AppliedGeography, 17 (4), pp. 301‒313.
• Riley, R., 1997: Central area activities in post-communist city: Łodź, Poland. In: Urban Studies, 34 (3), pp. 453‒470.[Crossref]
• Rowland, R.H., 1992a: Regional population trends in the city of Moscow during the 1979-1989 intercensal period. In: Post-Soviet Geography, 33 (3), pp. 150‒169.
• Rowland, R.H., 1992b: Selected urban population characteristics of Moscow. In: Post-Soviet Geography, 33 (2), pp. 569‒590.
• Rudolph, R. and Brade, I., 2005: Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery. In: Cities, 22 (2), pp. 135‒150.[Crossref]
• Rueschemeyer, M., 1993: East-Germany‘s new towns in transition: A grass-roots view of the impact of unification. In: Urban Studies, 30 (3), pp. 495‒506.[Crossref]
• Ruoppila, S., 2007: Establishing a market-orientated urban planning system after state socialism: The case of Tallinn. In: European Planning Studies, 15 (3), pp. 405‒427.[Crossref]
• Sagan, I. and Grabkowska, M., 2012: Urban regeneration in Gdańsk, Poland: Local regimes and tensions between top-down strategies and endogenous renewal. In: European Planning Studies, 20 (7), pp. 1135‒1154.[Crossref]
• Sailer-Fliege, U., 1999: Characteristics of post-socialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. In: Geo-Journal, 49 (1), pp. 7‒16.
• Scott, J.W. and Kuhn, M., 2012: Urban change and urban development strategies in Central East Europe: A selective assessment of events since 1989. In: European PlanningStudies, 20 (7), pp. 1093‒1109.[Crossref]
• Shomina, E.S., 1992: Enterprises and the urban environment in the USSR. In: International Journal of Urbanand Regional Research, 16 (2), pp. 222‒233.
• Shomina, Y., Kolossov, V. and Shukhat, V., 2002: Local activism and the prospects for civil society in Moscow. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43 (3), pp. 244‒270.[Crossref]
• Sidorov, D.A., 1992: Variations in perceived level of prestige of residential areas in the former USSR. In: UrbanGeography, 13 (4), pp. 355‒373.
• Simpson, F. and Chapman, M., 1999: Comparison of urban governance and planning policy: East looking West. In: Cities, 16 (5), pp. 353‒364.[Crossref]
• Sjoberg, O., 1992: Underurbanisation and the zero urban growth hypothesis: diverted migration in Albania. In: Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 74 (1), pp. 3‒19.[Crossref]
• Sjoberg, O., 1999: Shortage, priority and urban growth: towards a theory of urbanisation under central planning. In: Urban Studies, 36 (13), pp. 2217‒2236.[Crossref]
• Smith, A., Stenning, A., Rochovska, A. and Świątek, D., 2008: The emergence of a working poor: Labour markets, neoliberalisation and diverse economies in postsocialist cities. In: Antipode, 40 (2), pp. 283‒311.[Crossref]
• Smith, F.M., 1997: Contested geographical imaginings of reunification - A case study of urban change in Leipzig. In: Applied Geograpy, 17 (4), pp. 355‒369.[Crossref]
• Smith, F.M., 1999: Discourses of citizenship in transition: Scale, politics and urban renewal. In: Urban Studies, 36 (1), pp. 167‒187.[Crossref]
• Spevec, D. and Klempić Bogadi, S., 2009: Croatian cities under tranformation: new tendencies in housing and segregation. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en socialegeografie, 100 (4), pp. 454‒468.
• Staddon, C. and Mollov, B., 2000: City profile - Sofia, Bulgaria. In: Cities, 17 (5), pp. 379-387.[Crossref]
• Stanilov, K. ed., 2007: The post-socialist city: urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
• Steinfuhrer, A., Bierzyński, A., Grossmann, K., Haase,A., Kabisch, S. and Klusaček, P., 2010: Population decline in Polish and Czech cities during post-socialism? Looking behind the official statistics. In: Urban Studies, 47 (11), pp. 2325‒2346.[Crossref]
• Steinfuhrer, A. and Haase, A., 2007: Demographic change as future challenge for cities in East Central Europe. In: Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89 (2), pp. 183‒195.[Crossref]
• Stenning, A., 2000: Placing (post-) socialism. The making and remaking of Nowa Huta, Poland. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 7 (2), pp. 99‒118.
• Strom, E., 1996: The political context of real estate development. Central city rebuilding in Berlin. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 3 (1), pp. 3‒17.
• Struyk, R.J. and Romanik, C., 1995: Residential mobility in selected Russian cities: An assessment of survey results. In: Post-Soviet Geography, 36 (1), pp. 58‒66.
• Surazska, W., 1996: Transition to democracy and the fragmentation of a city: four cases of Central European capitals. In: Political Geography, 15 (5), pp. 365‒381.[Crossref]
• Sykora, L., 1993: City in transition: The role of rent gaps in Prague’s revitalization. In: Tijdschrift voor economischeen sociale geografie, 84 (4), pp. 281‒293.
• Sykora, L., 1994: Local urban restructuring as a mirror of globalisation processes: Prague in the 1990s. In: UrbanStudies, 31 (7), pp. 1149‒1166.
• Sykora, L., 1999: Processes of socio-spatial differentiation in post-communist Prague. In: Housing Studies, 14 (5), pp. 679-701.[Crossref]
• Sykora, L., 2009: New socio-spatial formations: places of residential segregation and separation in Czechia. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 100 (4), pp. 417‒435.
• Sykora, L. and Bouzarovski, S., 2012: Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the postcommunist urban transition. In: Urban Studies, 49 (1), pp. 43‒60.[Crossref]
• Sykora, L. and Štěpanek, V., 1992: City profile: Prague. In: Cities, 9 (2), pp. 91‒100.
• Špačkova, P. and Ouředniček, M., 2012: Spinning the web: new social contacts of Prague’s suburbanites. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 341‒349.[Crossref]
• Tammaru, T., 2000: Differential urbanization and primate city growth in Soviet and post-Soviet Estonia. In: Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 91 (1), pp. 20‒30.
• Tammaru, T., 2001a: Suburban growth and suburbanisation under central planning: The case of Soviet Estonia. In: Urban Studies, 38 (8), pp. 1341‒1357.[Crossref]
• Tammaru, T., 2001b: Urbanization in Estonia in the 1990s: Soviet legacy and the logic of transition. In: Post-SovietGeography and Economics, 42 (7), pp. 504‒518.
• Tammaru, T., 2005: Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metroplitan area. In: Environmentand Planning A, 37 (9), pp. 1669‒1687.
• Tammaru, T., Kulu, H. and Kask, I., 2004: Urbanisation, suburbanisation and counter urbanisation in Estonia. In: Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45 (3), pp. 212‒229.[Crossref]
• Tammaru, T., Leetmaa, K., Silm, S. and Ahas, R., 2009: Temporal and spatial dynamics of the new residential areas around Tallinn. In: European Planning Studies, 17 (3), pp. 423‒439.[Crossref]
• Temelova, J., 2007: Flagship developments and the physical upgrading of post-socialist inner city: the Golden Angel project in Prague. In: Geografiska Annaler: SeriesB, Human Geography, 89 (2), pp. 169‒181.
• Temelova, J. and Dvořakova, N., 2012: Residential satisfaction of elderly in the city centre: The case of revitalizing neighbourhoods in Prague. In: Cities, 29 (5), pp. 310-317.[Crossref]
• Temelova, J., Novak, J., Ouředniček, M. and Puldova, P., 2011: Housing estates in the Czech Republic after socialism: various trajectories and inner differentiation. In: Urban Studies, 48 (9), pp. 1811‒1834.[Crossref]
• Timar, J., 1992: The main featurest of suburbanization in the Great Hungarian Plain. In: Landscape and UrbanPlanning, 22 (2‒4), pp. 177‒187.
• Timar, J. and Varadi, M., 2001: The uneven development of suburbanization during transition in Hungary. In: EuropeanUrban and Regional Studies, 8 (4), pp. 349‒360.
• Tolle, A., 2008: City profile: Gdańsk. In: Cities, 25 (2), pp. 107‒119.
• Tolle, A., 2010: Urban identity policies in Berlin: From critical reconstruction to reconstructing the Wall. In: Cities, 27 (5), pp. 348‒357.[Crossref]
• Trumbull, N.S., 2012: Redevelopment and conservation in the built fabric of post-socialist St. Petersburg. In: Urban Geography, 33 (3), pp. 370‒400.[Crossref]
• Tsenkova, S., 2007: Reinventing strategic planning in postsocialist cities: Experiences from Sofia. In: EuropeanPlanning Studies, 15 (3), pp. 295‒317.
• Tsenkova, S. and Nedović-Budić, Z. eds., 2006: The urbanmosaic of post-socialist Europe - space, institutions andthe policy. Heidelberg, Springer.
• Turnock, D., 1990: City profile: Bucharest. In: Cities, 7 (2), pp. 107‒118.[Crossref]
• Van Kempen, R., Vermeulen, M. and Baan, A. eds., 2005: Urban issues and urban policies in the new EU countries, Burlington: Ashgate.
• Vendina, O., 2002: Social polarization and ethnic segreagation in Moscow. In: Euroasian Geography andEconomics, 43 (3), pp. 216‒243.
• Walker, A.R., 1993: Lodź: The problems associated with restructuring the urban economy of Poland’s textile metropolis in the 1990s. In: Urban Studies, 30 (6), pp. 1065‒1080.[Crossref]
• Wiest, K., 2012: Comparative debates in post-socialist urban studies. In: Urban geography, 33 (6), pp. 829‒849.[Crossref]
• Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S., 1999: Changing the perception of the post-socialist city: place promotion and imaginery in Łodź, Poland. In: Geographical Journal, 165 (2), pp. 183‒191.[Crossref]
• Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S., 2008: The socialist past and postsocialist urban identity in Central and Eastern Europe. The case of Łodź, Poland. In: European Urbanand Regional Studies, 15 (1), pp. 53‒70.
• Žegarac, Z., 1999: Illegal construction in Belgrade and the prospects of urban development planning. In: Cities, 16 (5), pp. 365‒370.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bog-2013-0002