World Tax Index: New Methodology for OECD Countries, 2000–2012

• Authors: Zuzana Machová , Igor Kotlán
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper follows our previous article, Kotlán and Machová (2012a), which presented an indicator of the tax burden that can be used as an alternative to the tax quota, or for implicit tax rates in macroeconomic analyses. This alternative is an overall multi-criteria index called the WTI - the World Tax Index. The aim of this paper is to present the new World Tax Index 2013 and its methodology, which allowed us to compute it for all 34 OECD countries for the 2000-2012 period, with special references to methodology changes from the previous version. We show that, using the WTI, the highest tax burden is measured for Denmark, Belgium and Turkey, while the lowest tax burden is in Switzerland, Ireland, Chile or Japan. The total ranking of the countries is from 66% correlated with the ranking according to the tax quota, mainly due to a strong correlation in the case of property taxes, personal income taxes and VAT-type taxes. In these cases, the tax quota seems to be a good approximator of the tax burden. However, there is no correlation between corresponding tax quotas and WTI sub-indices for corporate taxes or selective consumption taxes. In those cases, the tax quota apparently fails and is not suitable for use in further analyses.

Keywords

EN

Tax Burden Measurement; World Tax Index (WTI); Tax Quota; Corporate Tax

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: DANUBE: Law and Economics Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 165-179

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-07-09

Contributors

author

Zuzana Machová

• VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Sokolská trˇ. 33, 721 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

author

Igor Kotlán

• VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Sokolská trˇ. 33, 721 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

References

• Arnold, J. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 643.
• Börzel, T. (2011). Move Closer!NewModes of Governance and Accession to the European Union. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2(2), 1-22.
• De Laet, J.-P., Wöhlbier, F. (2008). Tax Burden by Economic Function: A Comparison for the EU Member States. MPRA Paper, 14761.
• Elschner, Ch., Schwager, R. (2004). A Simulation Method to Measure the Tax Burden on Highly Skilled Manpower. ZEW Discussion Papers, 04-59.
• Janíčková, L. (2013). Effective Tax Rates in the Moravian-Silesian Region. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 4(1), 83-92.
• Johansson, A., Heady, C., Arnold, J., Brys, B., Vartia, L. (2008). Tax and Economic Growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 621.
• Kiss, G. P., Jedrzejowicz, T., Jirsáková, J. (2009). How to Measure Tax Burden in an Internationally Comparable Way? National Bank of Poland Working Paper, 56.
• Kotlán, I. (2001). The Alternative Goals of the Stabilization Policy. Politická ekonomie, 49(4), 514-521.
• Kotlán, I. (2008). Gnoseology Approach to the Tax Reform in the Czech Republic. Politicka ´ ekonomie, 56(4), 505-519.
• Kotlán, I., Machová, Z. (2012a). World Tax Index: Methodology and Data. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 3(2), 19-33.
• Kotlán, I., Machová, Z. (2012b). The Influence of Corporate Taxation on Economic Growth: The Failure of Tax Quota? Politická ekonomie, 60(5), 743-763.
• Kotlán, I., Machová, Z., Janíčková, L. (2011). Taxation Influence on the Economic Growth. Politická ekonomie, 59(5), 638-658.
• Kotlánová, E., Kotlán, I. (2012). The Influence Of The Institutional Factors On The Corruption: The Empirical Analysis. Politická ekonomie, 60(2), 167-186.
• Laffer, A. B. (2004). The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future. Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, 1765.[WoS]
• Lazar, S. (2010). Effective Tax Burden Borne By Companies: A Review And A New Methodology. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(2), 584-588.
• Nagy, I. Z. (2011). The Economic and Psychological Contexts of the Tax Evasion on Hungary’s Example. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2(3), 55-68.
• OECD (2011). Revenue Statistics 1965-2010: 2011 Edition. Paris: OECD.
• Ricotti, G. et al. (2010). The Tax Burden on the Banking Sector: Some Methodological Issues and Assessments. Questioni di Economia e Finanza, Occasional Papers, 80.
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
• Szarowska, I. (2010). Changes in Taxation and their Impact on Economic Growth in the European Union. MPRA Paper, 32354.
• The World Bank (2012). Doing Business: Measuring Business Regulations [online]. Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org/.
• Walden, M. L. (1996). Implicit Tax Rates of the Expanded Earned Income Tax Credit for Welfare Recipients in North Carolina. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 30(2), 348-372.
• Zechner, J., Swoboda, P. (1986). The Critical Implicit Tax Rate and Capital Structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 10(3), 327-341.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/danb-2013-0008