Vilnius eastern partnership summit: milestone in EU-Russia relations – not just for Ukraine

• Authors: Peter Havlik
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit on 28-29th November 2013 represents a milestone in EU relations not just with respect to the six Eastern Partnership countries (EaP Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and particularly Ukraine), but also with the EU’s ‘strategic partner’ Russia. The turbulence and numerous speculations regarding expectations about the signature of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (comprising a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement - AA/DCFTA), as well as progress in initialling similar future agreements with Georgia and Moldova, have been escalating before the summit. The association agreementswould bring EaP signatory countries closer to the EU not really closer to EU membership, but closer to the application of various EU norms and standards (takeover of the ‘acquis communautaire’) and - significantly - out of the Russian orbit, for the beginning at least symbolically. The last minute postponement of the EU-Ukraine AA/DCFTA signature announced by Ukraine’s government just one week before the summit represents a serious setback for the EU. Though the EU has no ‘Plan B’ and was stunned after Ukraine’s announcement, life will continue after the summit and new initiatives will have to be started. What are the relevant issues and challenges and what is at stake? This note attempts to evaluate the consequences (economic and otherwise) of alternate decisions following the Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit, reviews some of the disputed arguments and discusses selected relevant economic issues.

Keywords

EN

Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit; European Union; Ukraine; EU-Ukraine Association Agreement; Russia

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: DANUBE: Law and Economics Review
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 21-51

Dates

published

2014-03-01

online

2014-04-12

Contributors

author

Peter Havlik

• The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw), Rahlgasse 3, A-1060 Vienna, Austria, and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1,A-2361 Laxenburg,Austria

References

• Astrov, V., Havlik, P. and Pindyuk, O. (2012). Trade Integration in the CIS: Alternate Options, Economic Effects and Policy Implications for Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, wiiw Research Report 381, Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
• Dabrowski, M. and Taran, S. (2012). The Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Ukraine: Conceptual Background, Economic Context and Potential Impact, CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 437.
• Dreyer, I. (2012). What economic benefit to expect from DCFTAs? Visegrad Group and Germany Policy Makers Seminar, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Prague, November.
• EBRD. (2012). Transition Report 2012. Integration Across Borders. Chapter 4. London.
• EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2012). Ukraine and the Customs Union. Comprehensive Assessment of the Macroeconomic Effects of Various Forms of Deep Economic Integration of Ukraine and the Member States of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space, St. Petersburg.
• EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). Monitoring of Mutual Investments. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 15. September. EDB: St. Petersburg.
• EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). The Customs Union and Neighbouring Countries: Mechanisms and Instruments of Mutually Beneficial Partnership. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 11. March. EDB: St. Petersburg.
• EDB Centre for Integration Studies. (2013). Economic and Technological Cooperation by Sectors SES and Ukraine. EDB Centre for Integration Studies’ Report no. 18. November.
• EDB: St. Petersburg. Emerson, M. (2005): EU-Russia - the Four Common Spaces and the Proliferation of the Fuzzy, CEPS Policy Brief, Brussels, May.
• Emerson, M. (2011a). Review of the review - of the European Neighbourhood Policy, CEPS European Neighbourhood Watch, 71, May.
• European Commission. (2010).Taking stock of the EuropeanNeighbourhood Policy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission.
• European Economy. (2011). The EU’sNeighbouring Economies: Coping with newchallenges, Occasional papers 86, DG ECFIN, November.
• Francois, J., Manchin, M., Norberg, H., Pindyuk, O. and Tomberger, P. (2013). Reducing Trans-Atlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment, European Commission and CEPR.
• Füle, Š. (2013a). EU-Ukraine: In Yalta about progress towards signing the Association Agreement. 10th Yalta Annual Meeting, in Yalta, Ukraine, 20 September, Speech/13/727.
• Füle, Š. (2013b). EU-Ukraine: Dispelling the Myths About the Association Agreement. International Conference “The Way Ahead for the Eastern Partnership”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 11 October, Speech/13/808.
• Füle, Š. (2013c). Speech at the National Round Table on European integration Kyiv, Ukraine, 11 October, Speech/13/810.
• Gligorov, V., Holzner, M., Landesmann, M., Leitner, S., Pindyuk, O. and Vidovic, H. (2012). New Divide(s) in Europe? Current Analyses and Forecasts, wiiw Research Report 9, Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
• Grant, Ch. (2011). A New Neighbourhood Policy for the EU, Centre for European Reform Policy Brief, London: CERP.
• Grinberg, R., Havlik, P. and Havrylyshyn, O. (eds). (2008). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden:Nomos.
• Havlik, P. (2003).EUEnlargement: Implications for Growth and Competitiveness’,Astudy commissioned by the Austrian Ministry for Economic Affairs and Labour. wiiw, Vienna, August.
• Havlik, P. (2008). Structural change and trade integration on EU-NIS borders’, In: R. Grinberg et al. (eds.). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 119-148.
• Havlik, P. (2010). European Energy Security in View of Russian Economic and Integration Prospects, wiiw Research Report 362,Vienna:Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
• Havlik, P. (2013). The European Union and Eurasia: Challenges of Economic Integration. Presentation at the VIII. Eurasian Development Bank Conference on Deepening and Widening of Eurasian Integration. Moscow, November. http://www.eabr.org/general//upload/8ConferenceDOC/presentations/Havlik-1.pdf.
• Havrylyshyn, O. (2008). Structural change in transition 1990-2005: A comparison of New Member States and selected NIS countries. In: R.Grinberg et al. (eds.). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 17-48.
• Hunya, G. (2008). FDI in the new EU borderland. In: R. Grinberg et al. (2008). Economic Restructuring and Integration in Eastern Europe. Experiences and Policy Implications, Baden Baden: Nomos, 73-94.
• Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. (2011). Ukraine’s Trade Policy Choice: Pros and cons of different regional integration options, Kiev: IERPC.
• Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (2011). Or_ntovna anal_tiqna oc_nka ekonom_qnih nasl_dk_v ukladenn_ ugodi pro zonu v_l~no = torg_vl_ z _S abo vhod_enn_ do Mitnogo so_zu Ros_ =, B_lorus_ ta Kazahstanu (Approximate analytical estimate of economic consequences of FTA with EU or joining the Customs Union of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus), Kyiv, mimeo.
• Movchan, V. and Shportyuk, V. (2012). EU-Ukraine DCFTA: the Model for Eastern Partnership Regional Trade Cooperation. CASE Network Studies and Analyses, No. 445.
• Richter, S. (2011). Revival of the Visegrad Countries’ Mutual Trade after their EU Accession: a Search for Explanation’ (with Neil Foster-McGregor, Gabor Hunya and Olga Pindyuk), wiiw Research Report, No. 372, Vienna, July.
• Samson, I. (2002). The Common European Economic Space Between Russia and the EU: An Institutional Anchor for Accelerating Russian Reform. Russian Economic Trends, 11(3).
• Vinokurov, E. and Libman, A. (2012). Eurasia and Eurasian Integration: Beyond the Post- Soviet Borders. Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2012. EDB: St. Petersburg, pp. 80-96.
• Vinokurov, E. and Libman, A. (2012). Eurasian integration: Challenges of transcontinental regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.[WoS]
• Wallace, H. (2009). The European Union and its neighbourhood: time for a rethink, ELIAMEP Thesis, 4, May.
• Wisniewski, P. D. (2013). It Is High Time to Start a ‘Real Partnership’. Carnegie Moscow Center, November. (http://carnegie.ru/2013/11/20).
• World Bank. (2013). Doing Business 2014: Doing Business in a More Transparent World.
• Washington. D.C.: World Bank. (http://www.doingbusiness.org). wiiw. (2013). Handbook of Statistics. Countries in Transition. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Vienna, November.
• Youngs, R. and Pishchikova, K. (2013). Smart Geostrategy for the Eastern Partnership. Carnegie Europe, November.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/danb-2014-0002