Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 5 | 2 | 143-154

Article title

Development of Concepts and Models of Performance Evaluation from the 19thCentury to the Present

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The main aim of this paper is to provide a framework of concepts and models from the area of performance measurement. Due to the fact that the business environment is con-stantly changing, changes also occur in the trends relating to performance. Traditional financial performance measures have been highly criticized and the need identified to integrate non-financial perspectives, such as level of innovation, degree of motivation, intellectual capital and other criteria. Intellectual capital is often a crucial factor in the creation of value in a company. This paper provides a literature review supplemented by the author’s research in the field of performance. The article shows that the performance appraisal system is currently focused on several areas that could affect the performance of the company, which is also part of the overall performance of the economy in the form of GDP growth. Based on the research, it can be said that, for the sample tracked, the selection of performance evaluation system does not depend on the legal form of the business.

Keywords

Publisher

Year

Volume

5

Issue

2

Pages

143-154

Physical description

Dates

online
2014-07-08

Contributors

  • Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Kolejní 2906, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

References

  • Bain & Company. (2012). Top 10 tools through the years. Retrieved on April 19, 2013, from http://www.bain.com/management_tools/BainTopTenTools/default.asp.
  • Bititci, U. S. (1994). Measuring your way to profit. Management Decision, 32(6), 16–24.[Crossref]
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
  • Epstein, M. J., Manzoni, J. (1997). The Balanced Scorecard and the Tableau de Bord: translating strategy into action. Management Accounting, 79(2), 28–36.
  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. (2007). Management by Measurement. Designing Key Indicators and Performance Measurement Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • George, M. L. (2010). Lean Six Sigma kapesní příručka. Brno: SC&C Partner.
  • Hronová, S., Fischer, J., Hindls, R., Sixta, J. (2009). Národní účetnict ví: nástroj popisu globální ekonomiky. Praha: C. H. Beck
  • Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D.P (2002). Balanced Scorecard: strategický systém měření výkonnosti podniku. Praha: Management Press.
  • Katic, D., Majstorovic, V., Colak, I. (2011). Performance Measurement Review. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings, 515-516.
  • Marinič, P. (2008). Plánování a tvorba hodnoty firmy. Praha: Grada.
  • Nečadová, M. (2012). Je HDP vhodným ukazatelem ekonomické výkonnosti a sociálního pokroku v podmínkách globalizace? Acta oeconomica pragensia, 20(5), 3-23.
  • Neely, A., Adams, C, Crowe, P. (2001). The Performance Prism in Practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 6-12.
  • Nenadál, J. (2002). Moderní systémy řízení jakosti: Quality management. Praha: Management Press.
  • Nenadál, J. (2004). M#x011B;řenív systémech managementu jakosti. Praha: Management Press.
  • Osberg, L., Sharpe, A. (2002). An Index of Economic Well-being for Selected OECD Countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 291-316.
  • Paladino, B. (2007). Five keys principles of corporate performance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Quinn, J. B., Thomas, L.D. and Penny, C.P. (1990). Beyond products: service-based strategy. Harvard Business Review, March/April, 58-68.[PubMed]
  • Rigby, D. (2010). Top 10 Management Tools. Retrieved on December 19, 2010 from http://bain.com/publications/business-insights/management-tools-and-trends-2011.aspx#.
  • Töpfer, A. (2008). Six Sigma: koncepce a příklady pro řízeníbez chyb. Brno: Computer Press.
  • Vouldis, A., Kokkinaki, A. (2011). A critical review of business performance models and frameworks and their application to sales organization. In European Conference on Intellectual Capital, 475–485.
  • Watts, T, McNair-Connolly, C. J. (2012). New performance measurement and management control systems. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(3), 226-241.
  • Yadav, N., Sagar, S., Sagar, M. (2013). Performance measurement and management framework. Research trends of the last two decades. Business Process Management, 19(6), 947-970.[Crossref]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_danb-2014-0008
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.