The empty meeting-place – Museum metaphors and their implication for learning

• Authors: Vaike Fors
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article argues for a need to scrutinize the meeting-place metaphor that is commonly used by museum practitioners, when describing the museum role in society as an informal learning environment. The metaphor indicates that there is an ambition that people should use the museum locality for meetings with others. However, there is no clear direction for what the meetings are for, who is setting up the meetings and around what and based on who’s agenda the desired meetings should be formed. As a means to push this discussion further, i. e what the meeting-place metaphor means, how it is perceived and what it does to how learning environments are designed, the article will re-visit empirical data from a study of how Swedish museum workers verbally give form to what newness in museums may consist of in their museum. The examples from the empirical data is discussed from a theoretical perspective on place as socially produced and occurring as people move through. My contribution question if the meeting-place metaphor as it is conceived by museum practioners is contra-productive to the one single purpose that all museums strive for, to attract a lot of visitors. The central question I am pursuing is if this way of using the meeting-place metaphor is obsolete and if so, what new routes may be taken in finding other metaphors more in line with how the museum can fit into contemporary mediatise society.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Designs for Learning
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 130-148

Dates

online

2014-12-20

Contributors

author

Vaike Fors

• Halmstad University, Sweden

References

• Appadurai, A. (Ed.) (1998). The social life of things. Cambridge University Press.
• Basu, P. & MacDonald, S. (2007). Experiments in Exhibition, Ethnography, Art and Science. In: P. Basu & S. MacDonald (Eds.), Exhibition Experiments, pp, 2007. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Beckman, S. & Hillström M. (2003). Museets självbilder. In: S. Beckman & L. Palmqvist (Eds.), Museer och framtidstro. Carlssons: Stockholm.
• Bollnow, O. F. (1963/1994). Vara-i-rum och ha-rum. Utdrag ur ’Mensch und Raum’. Nordisk Arkitektur forskning 7, (1994/1), 111-119.
• Falk, J. & Dierking, L. (2002). Lessons Without limits: How Free-Choice Learning is transforming Education. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
• Fors, V. (2013). Teenagers’ multisensory routes for learning in the musuem: Pedagogical affordances and constraints for dwelling in the museum. Senses & Society, Vol 8(3), pp. 268-289.
• Hein, G. E. (1998). The Constructivist Museum. London: Routledge.
• Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. & James, D. (2008). Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism Between Social and Individual Views of Learning. Vocations and Learning, 1, pp. 27-47.[WoS]
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Education, postmodernity and the museum. In: S. J. Knell, S. MacLeod & S. Watson (Eds.), Museum Revolutions. How museum change and are changed., pp 367-377, 2007. Routledge.
• Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A, 40, pp. 1796-8101.[WoS]
• Kahr-Højland, A. (2006). Changing Paradigms within Museums. Paper presented at the Nordic Digital Excellence in Museums (NODEM) conference, December 7-9, 2006, Oslo, Norway.
• Kelly, L. (2010). How Web 2.0 is Changing the nature of Museum Work. Curator: The Museum Journal, Vol. 53(4), pp. 405-410.
• Kelly, L. & Fitzgerald, P. (2011). Cooperation, collaboration, challenge: how to work with the changing nature of educational audiences in museums. In: N. Mockler & J. Sachs. (Eds.), Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry, pp. 77-88. Springer.
• Kelly, L. & Russo, A. (2008). From ladders of participation to networks of participation: Social media and the museum audiences. Paper presented at the Museum and the Web conference, April 9-12, 2008, Montreal, Canada.
• Knell, S. J., MacLeod, S. & Watson S. (2007). Introduction. In: S. J. Knell, S. MacLeod & S. Watson (Eds.), Museum Revolutions. How museum change and are changed., pp xix-xxvi, 2007. Routledge.
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In: T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E von Savigny, The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp 175-188, Routledge.
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Marstine, J. (2006). New Museum Theory and Practice: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
• McGonigal, J. (2006). This might be a game. Ubiquitous Play and Performance at the Turn of the Twenty-first century. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkely.
• Odengrund A. (2006). En ny forntid? - förändringar i basutställningar om forntiden 1972-2005. Master thesis, University of Linköping, Sweden.
• Peters, I. (2009). Folksonomies. Indexing and retrieval in web 2.0. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
• Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. Sage.
• Roberts, L. (1997). From Knowledge to Narrative: Educators and the Changing Museum. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
• Russo, A., Watkins, J., Kelly, L. & Chan, S. (2007). Social media and cultural interactive expereiences in museums. Nordisk Museologi, no. 1, pp.19-29.
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), pp. 4-13.
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. Penguin books.
• Simon, (2010). The participatory museum.
• Säljö, R. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing. In: T. Tuomi-Gröhn, & Y. Engeström (Eds.). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing, pp. 311-321. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and Place: The perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Weibel, P. & Latour, B. (2007). Experimenting with Representation: Iconoclash! And Making Things Public. In: P. Basu & S. MacDonald (Eds.), Exhibition Experiments, pp, 2007. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Zipin, L. (2009). Dark funds of knowledge, deep funds of pedagogy: exploring boundaries between lifeworlds and schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 30(3), pp. 317-331.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/dfl-2014-0007