Talking Books in Reading Instruction and Student Behavior

• Authors: Stig T. Gissel
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In grade 1, Danish students used a talking book with TTS (text-to-speech) and participated in a learning design with emphasis on decoding and reading for meaning in written text. The students all read the same unfamiliar text, which for many of the students would traditionally be considered being at their frustration level. Basing the intervention on connectionist theory of reading and Share’s self-teaching hypothesis, students were instructed to try to read the words before activating the TTS-function. Only five students out of 17 used the software in ways that could promote selfteaching, but underused the support. Five other students very quickly refrained from trying to decode, instead clicking the full page TTS. Another five students did not at any point try to decode words independently. These results suggest that by using TTS and talking books in reading instruction without measures to fine tune the scaffolding, it is very doubtful whether any students benefit from the TTS at all.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Designs for Learning
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 76-98

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2014-12-20

Contributors

author

Stig T. Gissel

• University College Lillebaelt & University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Adams, M.J. (1994). Modeling the connections between word recognition and reading. In R.B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading - (5th Ed., pp. 1210-1243). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Balajthy, E. (2005). Text-to-speech software for helping struggling readers. Reading Online, 8(4), 1-9.
• Beers, K. (2003). When kids can’t read: What teachers can do. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-15). London: Routledge.
• Betts, E. A. (1957/1946). Foundations of reading instruction with emphasis on differentiated guidance. New York, NY: American Book Company.
• Bowey, J.A. & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders’ silent reading: a critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2005 Nov; 92(3):203-19.
• Clay, M. M. (1993). An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Cunningham, A.E. et al. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 82 (2002) 185-199.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Dymock, S. (1993). Reading but not understanding. Journal of Reading, 37(2), 86-91.
• Edyburn, D. L. (2007). Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly 42/1.
• Ehri, L. C. (2008). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings. IN: Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (RED): The Science of Reading: A Handbook.
• Fischer, D., Frey, N. & Lapp, D. (2012). Text Complexity: Raising Rigor in Reading. International Reading Association.
• Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic Systems and Skilled Word Recognition Processes in Reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (272-295). Oxford: Blackwell Karemaker, A.M., Pitchford, N.J., & O’Malley, C. (2009). Enhanced recognition of written words and enjoyment of reading in struggling beginner readers through whole-word multimedia software. Computers and Education. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu .2009.07.018[Crossref]
• Karemaker, A.M., Pitchford, N.J., & O’Malley, C. (2008). Does whole-word multimedia software support literacy acquisition? Reading and Writing. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-008-9148-4[WoS][Crossref]
• Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication Discourse. London: Arnold.
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.
• Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CDROM storybook features that influence reading behaviours. The Reading Teacher. 58(5), 4-10.
• Littleton, K., Wood, C. and Chera, P. (2006). Interactions with talking books: Phonological awareness affects boys’ use of talking books. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), pp. 382-390.[Crossref]
• McKenna, M. C., Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2003). The effects of electronic trade books on the decoding growth of beginning readers. In R. M. Joshi, C. K. Leong, & B. L. J. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography (pp. 193-202). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
• McKenney, S. & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, Conventions and Design. Interactions 6(3):38-43, May 1999, ACM Press.
• Olofsson, A. (1992). Synthetic Speech and Computer Aided Reading for Reading Disabled Children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal v4 p 165-78. June 1992.
• Olson, R. K., Wise, B. W. (1992). Reading on the Computer with Orthographic and Speech Feedback: An Overview of the Colorado Remediation Project. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, v4 n2 p107-44 Jun 1992. (EJ483146)
• Parr, M. (2008). More than Words: Text-to-Speech Technology as a Matter of Self-Efficacy, Self- Advocacy, and Choice. Retrieved from digitool.library.mcgill.ca/thesisfile18738.pdf Pea, R. (2004). The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 423-451.
• Pressley, M., Rankin, J. & Yokoi, L. (1996). A Survey of Instructional Practices of Primary Teachers Nominated as Effective in Promoting Literacy. IN: The Elementary School Journal, vol 96, nr. 4.
• Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/part1.html
• Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180 -18.[Crossref]
• Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219-235.[Crossref]
• Seidenberg, M. (2005). Connectionist Models of Word Reading. American Psychological Society Vol 14, nr. 5.
• Shanahan, T. (2006). The National Reading Panel Report. Practical Advice for Teachers. Learning point Associates.
• Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Share, D. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Share, D. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267-298.[Crossref]
• Share, D. & Gur, T. (1999). How reading begins: A study of preschoolers’ print identification strategies.
• Cognition and Instruction, 17, 177-213.
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A. & Davis, S. (2009). Effective Beginning Reading Programs: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research. Vol. 79, Iss. 4; pp. 1391-1466.[WoS]
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21(4): 360-407.[Crossref]
• Wang, H.C., Castles, A., Nickles, L. & Nation, K. (2011). Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 109, Issue 1, May 2011, Pages 39-57. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.ez-vas.statsbiblioteket.dk:2048/science/article/pii/S0022096510002250
• Wood, D, Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 17, 1976, pp. 89-100. Pergamon Press. [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/dfl-2014-0012