Visualisation of Intangible Data of the Cultural Heritage in Field Research and Hermeneutic Analysis

• Authors: Ivan Murín
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Ethnology and cultural anthropology are characterized by the field research and ethnographic collection of material. Recording and transcription seem to be issues of ethnoscience that have already been resolved many years ago. The relevance of their use in science, e.g. by intercultural comparison,was getting lost with the use of more illustrative and available photo and film recording. Later on, the complicated schemes of interpretation of the empirical knowledge were a burden for the disciplines themselves; they were literally overloaded by sign systems. The issues have been methodologically addressed by resignation to the descriptive documentation. This paper is pointed at the methodological discourse of the visual documentation, visual data analysis and interpretation in research of the cultural heritage.

Keywords

EN

field methodology; visualisation; data; hermeneutic analysis; intangible cultural heritage

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Ethnologia Actualis
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 60-77

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-12-30

Contributors

author

Ivan Murín

• Department of Environment, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica

References

• BAKHTIN, M. (1979): Estetika slovasnovo tvorčestva. Moskva: Iskusstvo.
• BACHTIN, M. (1990): Bachtinskij sbornik. Moskva: Prometej.
• COLLIER, J. (1995): Photography and Visual Antropology. In. Paul Hockings. Princips of Visual Antropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.250-253.
• FRIESE, S. (2013): ATLAS.ti. In. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. [Online] 25th september 2013. http://www.atlasti.com/uploads/media/atlasti_v7_manual_201301.pdf.
• GEERTZ, C. (2000): Interpretace kultur. Vybrané eseje. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
• FELBEROVÁ, M. (2001): Odborná príprava a jej ďalšie komponenty pri filmovom spracovaní národopisných javov. Etnologické rozpravy, No. 1, pp.93-94.
• HALBWACHS, M. (1980): The collective memory. Harper & Row.
• HAMAR, J. (2013): The convention for the safeguarding of the intangible culture heritage. In. Slovenský národopis, vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 497-506.
• HENDL, J. (2005): Kvalitativní výskum. Základní metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál.
• HOCKINGS, P. [ed.]. (1995): Principles of Visual Anthropology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.
• CHRISTIAN, P. J. (2012): Memory, Monuments and Conflict. [Online] [26th September 2013.] http://www.academia.edu/1400651/Memory_Monuments_and_Conflict.
• ICCROM Working Group 'Heritage and Society", (2005): Definition of Cultural Heritage. References to documents in history. UNESCO. [Online] 15th January 2005. http://cif.icomos.org/pdf_docs/Documents%20on%20line/Heritage%20definitions.pdf.
• JUNG, K. G. (1954): Von den Wurzeln des Bewustseins. Studien uber den Archetypus. Zurich: s.n., Psychologische Abbandlungen, Zv. IX.
• KLUCKHOHN, C., KROEBER, A. L. and UNTEREINER, W. (1952): Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definition. s.l. : Vintage Books.
• LIPSITZ, G. (2001): Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture. In. American culture, Vol. 4.
• LOI, A. (1982): Fenomen ponimaniia i kulturno-istoricheskaia ontologiia soznaniia.Comprehension as a Logical-Gnoseological Problem. In. Nauka. London Declaration. (2004): Sustaining Europe’s Cultural Heritage: from research to policy. London: s.n. Online: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/sustainableheritage/conferenceproceedings.
• LORENZ, K. (1983): Abbau des Menschlichen (The Waning of Humaneness).Munchen: Piper Verlag.
• MacDOUGALL, D. (1995): Beyond Observation Cinema. In. Paul Hockings: Principles of Visual Anthropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• MEAD, G. H. (1934): Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. [ed.] Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• MEAD, M. and BATESON, G. (1977): On the Use of the Camera in Anthropology. In.Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication. December 1977, vol. 4, Nr. 2, pp.78-80.
• MEAD, M. (1963): Anthropology and the camera. In. Willard D. Morgan, Encyclopedia of photography. New York: s.n.
• PROFANTOVÁ, Z. (ed.) (2000): Milan Leščák bibliography. In. Folklór a folkloristika na prahu milénia na Slovensku, pp. 15-20.
• PINK, S. (2005): Classifying and Interpreting Photographic and Video Materials. In.Doing Visual Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications, pp.94-114.
• RHISIART, M. (2012b): JPI Cultural Heritage and Global Change, Report on Drivers of Change and the Future of Cultural Heritage. Paris: Centre for Research in Futures and Innovation, University of Glamorgan, UK with CM International University, research report.
• PETERKOVÁ, J. (2003): The Role of Cultural Heritage in the Process of Mutual Communication and Creation of Consciousness of Common Cultural Identity. In. Kakanien Revisited. [Online] 20th August 2003. http://www.kakanien.ac.at/beitr/fallstudie/JPeterkova1.pdf.
• PETRUSEK, M. (1993): Teorie a metoda v moderní sociologii. Praha: Karolinum.
• SEEBOHM, T. (2004): Hermeneutics. Method and Methodology. In. Contributions to Phenomenology, Vol. 50., Springer, p. 272.
• UNESCO, (1989). Draft Medium Term Plan. 25, vol. C, 4.
• VOROPAJ, T. S. (2002): Človek vo svete slova: Michail Michailovič Bachtin (1895-1975). In. Filozofia 9, vol. 57, pp. 651-666.
• WENGRAF, T. (2001): Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narratives and Semistructured Methods. London: SAGE.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/eas-2014-0004