Women in Local Politics in Russia: Coping with Poverty and Strategies for Development

• Authors: Ann-Mari Sätre
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In historical continuation from the Soviet Union, social policy is predominantly a female responsibility. The present article focuses on women in local politics, who have an important role in local change, and who; among others, cope with poverty and try to solve reasons and consequences of poverty. Based on interviews and observations, the article shows how women’s entrepreneurial skills of handling various shortcomings in the Soviet system are reflected in their present strategies for social development in local contexts in Russia. While the state leadership decides about reforms, setting new formal rules, local politicians develop their own routines and strategies. Being responsible for organising social welfare, interviewed female politicians told about how they use different strategies. This means that adopted practices are likely to be more heterogeneous than before. It seems important to both rely on useful norms inherited from the Soviet time, while also developing strategies based on new possibilities, arising as a result of reforms. The empirical data is based on interviews from three minor communities in one Russian region, conducted in 2002 to 2012.

Keywords

EN

Russia; women; agency; strategies; local politics; poverty

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Eastern European Countryside
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 27-53

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2014-12-20

Contributors

author

Ann-Mari Sätre

References

• Antyuganov, V. and Ivashinenko, N., 1994. Privatizatsiya i bankrotstvo [Privatization and bankruptcy], VVKTS.
• Appel, H., 2008. ’Is it Putin or Is It Oil? Explaining Russia’s Fiscal Recovery’, Post- Soviet Affairs, Vol. 24 (4): 301-323.[Crossref]
• Chebankova, E., 2010. ‘Public and Private Cycles of Socio-Political Life in Putin’s Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 26 (2):121-148.[Crossref]
• Clements, B. E., 1992. ‘The Utopianism of the Zhenotdel’, Slavic Review, Vol. 51 (3): 485-496.[Crossref]
• Cuddy, M. and Qian L., 2007. ‘The Rural Economy in China and Russia - What is Different? Is There a Lesson for Russia?’, Econ Change, Vol. 40: 157-187.
• Davis, C., 1989. Priority and the shortage model: the medical system in the socialist economy. In: Davis, C. and Charemza, W. (eds.), Models of Disequilibrium and Shortage in Centrally Planned Economies. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
• Duvanova, D. S., 2011. ‘Firm Lobbying versus Sectoral Organization: The Analysis of Business-State Relations in Post-Communist Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 27 (2): 387-409.[Crossref]
• Ericson, R., 2009. ‘The Russian Economy in the Year 2008: Testing the “Market Economy” ’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 25 (3): 209-231.[Crossref]
• Gaddy, C. G., 2007. ‘The Russian Economy in the Year 2006’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 21 (1): 38-49.[Crossref]
• Granberg, L., 2007. Rural Paths in Russia, In: Heinonen, M., Nikula, J, Kopoteva, I. and Granberg, L. (eds), Refiecting Transformation in Post-Socialist Rural Areas, Cambridge: Scholars Publishing, pp. 49-62.
• Hitt, M., 2004. ‘The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economics: China vs. Russia’, Organization Science, Vol. 15 (2): 173-185.[Crossref]
• Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. and Romanov, P., 2002. ‘A Salary is not Important Here: The Professionalization of Social Work in Contemporary Russia’, Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 36 (2): 123-141.
• Kay, R., 2011. ‘(Un)caring Communities: Processes of Marginalisation and Access to Formal and Informal Care and Assistance in Rural Russia’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 27 (1): 45-53.[Crossref]
• Khlinskaya Rockhill, E., 2010. Lost to the State. Family Discontinuity, Social Orphanhood and Residential Care in the Russian Far East. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
• Kornai, J., 1980. Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
• Kulmala, M., 2010. ‘Women Rule this Country: Womens Community Organizing and Care in Rural Karelia’, the Anthropology of East Europe Review, Vol. 28 (2): 164-184.
• Kuznetsov, B., Dolgopyatova, T., Golikova, V., Yakovlev, A. and Yasin, Y., 2011, ‘Russian Manufacturing Revisited: Industrial Enterprises at the Start of the Crisis’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 27 (4): 366-386.[Crossref]
• Lapidus, Gail W., 1975. ‘Political Mobilization, Participation, and Leadership: Women in Politics’, Comparative Politics 8 (1): 90-118.[Crossref]
• Lazareva, O., 2009. Labour Market Outcomes During the Russian Transition, Stockholm School of Economics (dissertation).
• Ledeneva, A., 2008. ‘Telephone Justice in Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 24 (4): 324-350.[Crossref]
• Lindner, P., 2009. ‘Localising Privatization, disconnecting locales - Mechanisms of disintegration in post-socialist rural Russia’, Geoforum, Vol. 38: 494-504. Malle, S., 2012. ‘Policy Challenges of Russia’s Post-Crisis Economy’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. (28) 1: 66-110.
• Melin, H. (ed.), 2005. Social Structure, Public Space and Civil Society in Karelia, University of Helsinki: Kikimora Publications 34.
• Moses, J. C., 2008. ‘Who Has Led Russia? Russian Regional Political Elites, 1954-2006’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 60 (1): 1-24.
• Nikitin, G. G., Dulskaya, N. N., Burko, I. Yo. and Nikitin, A. G., 2002. ‘Kozyaistvennaya deyatelnost predpriyatii’ [The economic activity of an enterprise], EKO, Vol. 6: 25-39.
• North, D., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Polichuk, L., 2009. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: Institutional Analysis with an Application to Russia’. Working Paper WP10/2009/01, Moscow State University - Higher School of Economics.
• Remington, T., 2011. ’The Russian Middle Class as Policy Objective‘, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 27 (2): 97-120.[Crossref]
• Rimashevskaya, N. M., 2010. ‘Riski bednosti v sovremennoi Rossii’ [Risks of poverty in modern Russia], Narodonaselenie, Vol. 2 (48): 4-9.
• Roland, G., 2006. ‘The Russian Economy in the Year 2005’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 22 (1): 90-98.[Crossref]
• Rossiya v Tsifrakh [Russia in figures], (various years), Goskomstat Rossii, Moscow.
• Rossiyskiy Statisticheskiy Yezhegodnik [Russian Statistical Yearbook], (various years) Goskomstat Rossii, Moscow.
• Sakwa, R., 2010. ‘The Dual State in Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 26 (3): 185-206.[Crossref]
• Salmenniemi, S., 2008. Democratization and Gender in Contemporary Russia, London & New York: Routledge.
• Sen, A., 1984. Resources, Values and Development, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
• Shanin, T. and Alexander, N., 2012. Vtoraya Rossiya: Differentsiatsiya i Camaorganizatsiya [Second Russia: differentiation and self-organization]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo dom ‘Delo’.
• Shevchenko, J., 2002. ‘Who Cares about Women’s Problems? Female Legislators in the 1995 and 1999 Russian State Dumas’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 54 (8): 1201-1222.
• Shubin, S., 2007. ‘Networked Poverty in Rural Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 59 (4): 591-620.
• Smyth, R., Lowry A. and Wilkening B., 2007. ‘Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 23 (2): 118-137.[Crossref]
• Soutworth, C., 2006. ‘The Dacha Debate. Household Agriculture and Labor Markets in Post-Socialist Russia’, Rural Sociology; 71 (3): 451-478.[Crossref]
• Svensson, B., 2008. Seven years that shook Soviet economic and social thinking.
• Reflections on the revolution in communist economics 1985-91, Stockholm Studies in Economic History No. 55, Stockholm University (dissertation).
• Sätre, A-M., 1994. Environmental Problems in the Shortage Economy: the Legacy of Soviet Environmental Policy, Aldershot and Brookfield USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• Sätre A.-M., 2001. ‘Women’s and Men’s Work in Transitional Russia: Legacies of the Soviet System’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 17 (1): 56-79.
• Sätre, A.-M., 2007. Vild kapitalism och gammal byråkrati. Om småföretagare i Ryssland [Wild capitalism and old bureaucracy. On small entrepreneurs in Russia]. Nøhaven Danmark: Premiss förlag.
• Sätre, A.-M., 2010. Women’s Work in transitional Russia: Women’s Strategies for Entrepreneurship and Survival in Russian Regions, in: Kangaspuro, M. Nikula, J. & Stodolsky, I. (eds.) Perestroika: Process and Consequences, Helsinki: Finnish Literary Society.
• Sätre, A.-M., 2012. Gendered Experiences in Russian Entrepreneurship, Family and Social Activities. In: Carlbäck, H., Gradskova, I. and Kravchenko Z. (eds.), And they All Lived Happily Ever A+er? Norms and Everyday Practices of Family and Parenthood in Russia and Eastern Europe, CEU press, pp. 297-318.
• Sätre, A.-M., 2013. Women’s Work, Political Strategies and Survival in rural Russia. In: Simmons, C. (ed.) Post-Communist Transition and Women’s Agency: Russia and the “Near Abroad” , Dordrecht: ROL Publishers. Thiessen, U., 2006. ‘Fiscal Federalism in Russia: Theory, Comparisons, Evaluations’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 22 (3): 189-224.
• Tompson, W., 2005. ‘The Political Implications of Russia’s Resource-Based Economy’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 21 (4): 335-359.[Crossref]
• Treisman, D., 2010. ‘Loans for Share’ Revisited’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 26 (3): 207-227.[Crossref]
• Vartapetov, K., 2011. ‘Russian fiscal federalism under stress: federal support of regions during the global financial crisis’, Eurasian geography and economics, Vol. 52 (4): 529-542. Voronin, Yo., 2002. ‘Prioritety byodzhetnoi politiki’ [Priority in budget politics], Ekonomist, Vol. 7: 52-57.
• Wegren, K., O’Brien, D. and Patsiorkovski, V., 2003. ’Russia’s Rural Unemployed, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 55 (6): 847-867.
• Wegren, K., 2011. ‘Private farming in Russia: An Emerging Success?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 26 (3): 211-240.[Crossref]
• Wengle, S. and Rasell, M., 2008. ‘The Monetisation of L’goty: Changing Patterns of Welfare Politics and Provision in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 60 (5): 739-756.
• White, A., 2000. ‘Social Change in Provincial Russia: The Intelligentsia in a Raion Centre’, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 52 (4): 677-694.
• Yates, S., 2004. Living with Poverty in Post-Soviet Russia: Social Perspectives on Urban Development, London School of Economic and Political Science (doctoral thesis).

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/eec-2014-0002