Content Analysis Algorithms: An Innovative and Accurate Approach to Statement Veracity Assessment

• Authors: Bartosz Wojciech Wojciechowski
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

EN

psychological content analysis; veracity assessment; statement validity assessment; decision algorithm

• Publisher: Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego / Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM KAAFM
• Journal: European Polygraph
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 119-128

Dates

published

2014-09-01

online

2014-12-20

Contributors

author

Bartosz Wojciech Wojciechowski

• Clinical and Forensic Psychology Department, University of Silesia Katowice Poland

References

• Akehurst L., Bull R., Vrij A., Koehnken G., (2004), Th e eff ects of training professional groups and lay persons to use Criteria-Based Content Analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877.[Crossref]
• Blandon-Gitlin I., Pezdek K., Lindsay S.D., Hagen L. (2009), Criteria-Based Content Analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901.[WoS][Crossref]
• Buck J.A., Warren A.R., Betman S.I., Brigham J.C. (2002), Age diff erences in criteria-based content analyses scores in typical sexual abuse interviews. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 267.[Crossref]
• Goedert H.W., Gamer M., Rill H.R., Vossel G., (2005), Statement validity assessment: inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225.[Crossref]
• Granhag P.A., Stroemwall L.A., Landstroem S. (2008), Children recalling an event repeatedly: eff ects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Crimininological Psychology, 11, 81-98.
• Kapardis A., (2003), Psychology and law. A critical introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Koehnken G.(2004), Statement Validity Analysis and the “detection of truth” in P.A. Granhag, L.A. Stroemwall, eds. Th e detection of deception in forensic contexts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41.
• Koehnken G., Schimossek E., Aschermann E., Hoefer E., (1995), Th e Cognitive Interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6, 671.[Crossref]
• Pezdek K. (2004), Detecting deception in children: event familiarity aff ects Criterion-Based Content Analysis ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1, 119-126.[Crossref]
• Rassin E. (2001), Criteria-based content analysis: the less scientifi c road to truth. Expert Evidence, 7, 265.
• Ruby C.L., Brigham J.C. (1997), Th e usefulness of the Criterion-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations: A critical review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 705.[Crossref]
• Sporer S.L. (1997), Th e less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373.[Crossref]
• Trankell A. (1972), Reliability of evidence, Beckmans, Stockholm.
• Undeutsch U. (1967), Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Zeugenaussagen, in: Handbuch der Rechtspsychologie, ed. Undeutsch U., Gettingen, Hogrefe, 26.
• Vrij A., (2008), Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Wiley, Chichester.
• Vrij A. (2005), Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the fi rst 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 1, 3.
• Vrij A., Mann S., (2006), Criteria-Based Content Analysis: an empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 337.
• Vrij A., Akehurst L., Soukara S., Bull R. (2004), Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and Reality Monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching and deception, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 2, 113.[Crossref]
• Wojciechowski B.W. (2012). Ocena wiarygodności zeznań świadkow dorosłych przy zastosowaniu psychologicznych i prawniczych kryteriow treściowych; unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Silesia in Katowice.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ep-2014-0010