An Essay on the Social Costs and Benefits of Technology Evolution

• Authors: Maximiliano E. Korstanje , Geoffrey Skoll
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

After the Chernobyl’s and Three Miles’s accidents, the relation between technology and risk started to be questioned. Social scientist posited considerable criticism against technology and how its interventions may engender new dangers. However, these views ignored the fact that risks are not just a result of technology, but also depend upon the trust and knowledge. Any risk, first, should be defined as a narrative which is enrooted in a previous cultural and stereotyped framework. By itself, technology is only an instrument employed in different directions. This essay review explores the limitations and approaches of two senior sociologists who delved in the study of risk and climate change, Cass Sunstein and Anthony Giddens.

Keywords

EN

Risk; Disaster; Technology; Sociology; Modernity

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human and Social Studies
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 13-39

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-07-05

Contributors

author

Maximiliano E. Korstanje

• Department of Economics, University of Palermo, Larrea 1079 Road, Buenos Aires, BUE, Argentina. Voice: [phone]

author

Geoffrey Skoll

• Buffalo State College, New York, USA

References

• Amar, Georges. Homo Mobilis. The new era of mobility. Buenos Aires: La Crujia, 2011.
• Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Fears contemporary society and its liquid fears. Buenos Aires: Paidos Editorial, 2008.
• Barney, Darin. One Nation Under Google, Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2007.
• Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society, towards a new modernity. Buenos Aires: Paidos, 2006.
• Benko, Steven. “Ethics, Technology, and post human communities.” Essays inPhilosophy 6.1 (2005): 1−17.
• Castel, R. The Social Insecurity ¿what does it mean to be protected? Buenos Aires: El Manantial, 2006.
• Cuevas, Ana. “The many Faces of Science and Technology relationships.” Essays in Philosophy 6.1 (2005): article 3.
• Erikson, K. A new Species of Trouble. Explorations in disasters, trauma and community. NY: Norton and company, 1994.
• Farris, James. “Philosophy regarding technology.” Essays in Philosophy 6.1 (2005): article 5, <http://commons.pacificu.edu>.
• Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and society in The late modern age. California: Stanford University Press, 1991.
• Giddens, Anthony. The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.
• Hugues, James H. Citizen Cyborg. Why democratic societies must respond to theredesigned human of the future. Cambridge: West-view Press, 2004.
• Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. London: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006.
• Marcuse, Herbert. One Dimensional Man. Studies in ideology of advanced industrysociety. London: Routledge, 1991.
• Perrow, Charles. Normal Accidents. Living with high risk Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
• Scott-Ruse, M. “Technology and the Evolution of the Human, from Bergson to the philosophy of Technology.” Essays in Philosophy, 6.1 (2005): article 27, <http://commons.pacificu.edu>.
• Sorman, Guy. The Progress and its enemies. Buenos Aires: Emece, 2002.
• Sunstein, Cass. Risk and Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
• Virilio, Paul. El Arte del Motor: aceleración y realidad. Buenos Aires: ediciones el Manantial, 1996.
• Virilio, Paul. Ciudad Pánico: el afuera comienza aquí. Buenos Aires; Libros el Zorzal, 2007.
• Virilio, Paul. The University of Disaster. Oxford: Polity Press, 2010.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/hssr-2013-0002