Child- centered pedagogies, curriculum reforms and neoliberalism. Many causes for concern, some reasons for hope

• Authors: Encarna Rodríguez
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article maps some of the ways in which neoliberalism, pedagogy, and curriculum are closely interconnected. Looking at the Spanish curriculum reform during the first Socialist administration in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it explicitly identifies child-centered pedagogies as an important tool in articulating the neoliberal agenda in curriculum reforms around the world. It explores the way Spain uncritically embraced these curriculum reforms with a notion of the individual not defined by the educational needs of the country but by the neoliberal rationality dominating Spain’s political and economic transition at the time. Based on this analysis and on the way child-centered pedagogies have been implemented in education reforms around the world, this article considers the question of whether such pedagogies can really work toward the democratic ideals they claim to serve. The article concludes by offering some reflections on this question and by calling for a larger and interdisciplinary conversation on the ideological possibilities of these pedagogies.

Keywords

EN

constructivism; curriculum reform; child- centered pedagogies; neoliberalism; governmentality; Spain

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Pedagogy
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 59-78

Dates

published

2013-06-01

online

2013-04-03

Contributors

author

Encarna Rodríguez

• Saint Joseph‘s University, Department of Educational Leadership, 5600 City Ave., Philadelphia, 19131-1395, PA, USA

References

• Amsler, S. S. (2009). Promising futures? Education as a symbolic resource of hope in Kyrgyzstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(7), 1189-1206.[WoS]
• Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.[WoS]
• Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1996). Introduction. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason. Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalitiesof government (pp. 1-18). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Burchell, G. (1993). Liberal government and techniques of the self. Economy andSociety, 22 (3), 267-282.
• Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What does globalization mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 1-9.
• Cascante, C. (1995). Neoliberalismo y reformas educativas. Reflexiones para el desarrollo de teorías y prácticas educativas de izquierda. Signos. Teoría y práctica de laeducación, 15, 42-61.
• Cascante, C. (1997). Neoliberalismo y educación. Utopías, 172 (2), 15-36.
• Coll, C. (1991). Concepción constructivista y planteamiento curricular. Cuadernosde Pedagogía, 188, 8-11.
• Coll, C. (1995). Psicología y currículum (5th ed.). Barcelona, Buenos Aires & Mexico: Paidós.
• Domínguez de Montoya, M. d. M. (2008). Nivel de conocimiento sobre el Enfoque Constructivista de las Maestras de Educación Parvularia. Crea Ciencia, 5(8), 21-23.
• Doz Orrit, J. (1995). Problems of implementation in Spanish Educational Reform. In O. Boyd-Barrett, & P. O’Malley (Eds.), Education Reform in democratic Spain (pp. 79-93). London & New York: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H.
• Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo & Singapore: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
• Gentili, P. (1997). El consenso de Washington y la crisis en América Latina, Archipiélago, 29, 56-65.
• Gimeno [Jimeno] Sacristán, J. (1995). The process of pedagogic reform. In O. Boyd- -Barrett & P. O”Malley (Eds.), Education reform in democratic Spain (pp. 113-125). London & New York: Routledge.
• Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C.
• Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 1-49). London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo & Singapore: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practices, Educational Researcher, 32 (5), 19-25.
• Holman, O. (1996). Integrating Southern Europe. EC expansion and the transnationalizationof Spain. London & New York: Routledge.
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-Americanchildren. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race,and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
• Martínez Bonafé, J. (2001). Arqueología del concepto “compromiso social en el discursopedagógico de formación docente. Retrieved May 20, 2012 from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol3no1/contenido-bonafe.html
• McVeigh, P. (2005). Embedding neoliberalism in Spain: From Franquismo to neoliberalism. In S. Soederberg, G. Menz, & P. G. Cerny (Eds.), Internalizing globalization. The rise of neoliberalism and the decline of national varieties of capitalism (pp. 90-105). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (1995). Preamble to LOGSE. In O. Boyd-Barrett & P. O’Malley (Eds.), Education Reform in democratic Spain (pp. 53-64). London & New York: Routledge.
• Moreno Olmedilla, J. M. (1998). Notas para una genealogía de los estudios curricularesen España, Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, Retrieved May 17, 2006 from http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev22ART1.pdf.
• Moll, L. C. (Ed.) (1990). Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applicationsof sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Phillips, D. C. (Ed.) (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinionson controversial issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Peters, M. (1996). Poststructuralism, politics and education. Westport, CT & London: Bergin & Garvey.
• Plataforma Asturiana de Educación Crítica (1998). Para una revisión crítica de la reforma educativa. HEURESIS [on-line]. http://www2.uca.es/HEURESIS/revisioncritica.htm.
• Rodríguez, E. (2001). Neoliberalismo, educación y género: Análisis crítico de la reformaeducativa española. Madrid: La Piqueta.
• Rosas, R., & Sebastián, C. (2001). Piaget, Vygotski y Maturana. Constructivismoa tres voces. Buenos Aires: Aique.
• Rose, N. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In P. Heelas, & P. Morris (Eds.), Thevalues of the enterprise culture (pp. 141-164). London & New York: Routledge.
• Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves. Psychology, power and personhood (2nd ed.). Cambridge, New York & Melbourne, Cambridge University Press.
• Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Silva, T. T. da (1998). Las pedagogías psy y el gobierno del yo en nuestros regimenes neoliberales. Archipiélago, 38, 56-61.
• Silva, T. T. da (2001). Espacios de identidad. Nuevas visiones sobre el curriculum. Barcelona, Spain: Octaedro.
• Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2006). The learning society and governmentality: An introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38 (4), 417-430.
• Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39 (1), 7-26.
• Terwell, J. (1999). Constructivism and its implications for curriculum theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31 (2), 195-199.[Crossref]
• Tuschling, A. & Engemann, C. (2006). From Education to lifelong learning: The emerging regime of learning in the European Union. Educational Philosophy andTheory, 38 (4), 451-469.
• Varela, J. (1991). El triunfo de las pedagogías psicológicas. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 198, 56-59.
• Varela, J. (2007). Las reformas educativas a debate (1982-2006). Madrid: Morata.
• Walkerdine, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: psychology, social regulationand subjectivity (pp. 152-202). London & New York: Methuen.
• Watkins, W. H. (Ed.) (2011). The assault on public education: Confronting the politicsof corporate school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72 (2), 131-175.
• Wigg, R. (1988). Spain: Europeanism in place of socialism. The World Today, 44, 115-118.
• Woo, Y. Y. J., & Simmons, J. A. (2008). Paved with good intentions: Images of textbook development in Afghanistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 28 (3), 291-304.[WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/jped-2013-0004