On the pregnance of bodily movement and geometrical objects: A post-constructivist account of the origin of mathematical knowledge

• Authors: Wolff-Michael Roth
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Traditional (e.g., constructivist) accounts of knowledge ground its origin in the intentional construction on the part of the learner. Such accounts are blind to the fact that learners, by the fact that they do not know the knowledge to be learned, cannot orient toward it as an object to be constructed. In this study, I provide a phenomenological account of the naissance (birth) of knowledge, two words that both have their etymological origin in the same, homonymic Proto-Indo-European syllable ĝen-, ĝenә-, ĝnē-, ĝnō-. Accordingly, the things of the world and the bodily movements they shape, following Merleau-Ponty (1964), are pregnant with new knowledge that cannot foresee itself, and that no existing knowledge can anticipate. I draw on a study of learning in a second-grade mathematics classroom, where children (6-7 years) learned geometry by classifying and modeling 3-dimensional objects. The data clearly show that the children did not foresee, and therefore did not intentionally construct, the knowledge that emerged from the movements of their hands, arms, and bodies that comply with the forms of things. Implications are drawn for classroom instruction

Keywords

EN

pregnance; naissance; knowledge; cognition; movement

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal of Pedagogy
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 65-89

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-07-10

Contributors

author

Wolff-Michael Roth

• Lansdowne Professor University of Victoria Applied Cognitive Science MacLaurin Building A557 Victoria, BC V8W 3N4 Canada

References

• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie [A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia]. Paris, France: Les Éditions de Minuit.
• Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und zeit [Being and time]. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer. (First published in 1927) Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behaviour. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 872-876.
• Henry, M. (2000). Incarnation: Une phénoménologie de la chair [Incarnation: A phenomenology of the flesh].Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.
• Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana Band I: Cartesianische mediationen und pariser vorträge [Husserliana vol. 1: Cartesian meditations and Paris lectures]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Husserl, E. (1976). Husserliana Band VI: Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie [Husserliana vol. 4. The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London, UK: Routledge.
• Lee, G., & Byun, T. (2012). An explanation for the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: The relationship between cognitive conflict and responses. Research in Science Education, 42, 943-965.[WoS]
• Leont’ev, A. N. (1959). Problemy razvitija psixhiki [Problems of mental development]. Moscow, USSR: Idastel’stvo Akademii Pedagogičeskix Nauk.
• Maine de Biran, P. (1859a). OEuvres inédites, tome 1 [Unpublished works vol. 1]. Paris, France: Dezobry and Magdeleine.
• Maine de Biran, P. (1859b). OEuvres inédites, tome 2 [Unpublished works vol. 2]. Paris, France: Dezobry and Magdeleine.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of perception] Paris, France: Gallimard.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris, France: Gallimard.
• Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Corpus [Corpus]. Paris, France: Métaillé.
• Petitmengin, C. (2006). L’énaction comme expérience vécue [Enaction as lived experience]. Intellectica, 43, 85-92.
• Petitmengin, C. (2007). Towards the source of thoughts: The gestural and transmodal dimensions of lived experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 54-82. G., L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, & L. Fogassi. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1997). The space around us. Science, 277, 190-191.
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 295 (5), 54-61.[WoS]
• Romano, C. (1998). L’événement et le monde [Event and world]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Roth, W.-M. (2012). Mathematical learning: The unseen and unforeseen. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32 (3), 15-21.
• Roth, W.-M. (2013). To event: Towards a post-constructivist approach to theorizing and researching curriculum as event*-in-the-making. Curriculum Inquiry, 43, 388-417.[Crossref][WoS]
• Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. G. (2013). Situated cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 463-478.
• Roth, W.-M., & Lawless, D. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12, 285-304.[Crossref]
• Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Roth, W.-M., & Thom, J. (2009a). Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: From classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 175-189.[WoS]
• Roth, W.-M., & Thom, J. (2009b). The emergence of 3d geometry from children’s (teacher-guided) classification tasks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 45-99.[WoS]
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). The corporeal turn: An interdisciplinary reader. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2010). Body and movement: Basic dynamic principles. In S. Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 217-234). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
• Suchman L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/jped-2014-0004