The Profile and Work of Officials in Central and Regional Administration Compared: The Case of the Czech Republic

• Authors: Arnošt Veselý
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper examines the profiles and work tasks of officials in central and regional administration in the Czech Republic. It analyzes data from surveys among the officials of eleven ministries in 2013 (N = 1351) and fourteen regional offices in 2012 (N = 783). First, the profile of ministerial officials (MOs) is compared with that of regional-level officials (ROs). In accordance with our hypotheses, on average it is found that MOs are, when compared to ROs, older, more educated and have spent more time in civil service. Th ere is also a higher proportion of men in ministries than in regional offices. On the other hand, ministerial work seems to be affected by higher levels of fluctuation than jobs in the regional offices. Second, we compare work tasks of MOs and ROs. As expected, MOs are more involved in analytical tasks and research than ROs. In contrast, ROs are more likely to implement policies or programs, direct and monitor programs or lower-level bodies, provide advice for political bodies of the region, negotiate with elected politicians, communicate with citizens and provide methodological guidance, train or lecture. Contrary to our theoretical expectations, we found a strong positive correlation between analytical and brokering tasks (communication and negotiation). We thus reject the hypothesis that analytical tasks are at odds with negotiating and communication. Instead, it is concluded that most officials are multitaskers, and it is especially so in regional offices. It is hypothesized that this might be caused by the fact that regional offices are smaller and have a lower capacity to specialize

Keywords

EN

Ministries; regional offices; policy analysis; policy work; sample survey; Czech Republic

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 107-128

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-07-26

Contributors

author

Arnošt Veselý

• Associate Professor, Institute of Sociological Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

References

• Baun, Michael and Dan Marek. 2006. “Regional Policy and Decentralization in the Czech Republic.” Regional & Federal Studies 16(4), 409 - 428.
• Bouckaert, Geert, Vitalis Nakrošis and Juraj Nemec. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4(1), 9 - 29.
• Colebatch, Hal K. (ed.). 2006. Th e Work of Policy: An International Survey. Oxford: Lexington Books.
• Colebatch, Hal K., Robert Hoppe and Mirko Noordegraaf (eds). 2010. Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Colebatch, Hal K. and Beryl A. Radin. 2006. “Mapping the work of policy.” In Hal K.
• Colebatch (ed.). Th e Work of Policy: An International Survey. Lanham: Lexington Books, pages, 217 - 226
• Craft , Jonathan and Michael Howlett. 2013. “Th e Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: Th e Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32(3), 187 - 197.[WoS]
• Drulák, Petr, Jiři Česal and Stanislav Hampl. 2003. “Interactions and Identities of Czech Civil Servants on their Way to the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 10(4), 637 - 654.[Crossref]
• Dunn, William N. 2004. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How ? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” Th e American Political Science Review 97(2), 233 - 243.
• Hoppe, Robert. 1999. “Policy Analysis, Science and Politics: From ‘Speaking Truth to Power’ to ‘Making Sense together’.” Science and Public Policy 26(3), 201 - 210.
• Howlett, Michael. 2011. “Public Managers as the Missing Variable in Policy Studies: An Empirical Investigation Using Canadian Data.” Review of Policy Research 28(3), 247 - 263.
• Howlett, Michael and Joshua Newman. 2010. “Policy Analysis and Policy Work in Federal Systems: Policy Advice and its Contribution to Evidence-Based Policy-Making in Multi-Level Governance Systems.” Policy and Society 29(2), 123 - 136.
• Howlett, Michael and Richard M. Walker. 2012. “Public Managers in the Policy Process: More Evidence on the Missing Variable ?” Policy Studies Journal 40(2), 211 - 233.[WoS][Crossref]
• Howlett, Michael and Adam M. Wellstead. 2012. “Professional Policy Work in Federal States: Institutional Autonomy and Canadian Policy Analysis.” Canadian Public Administration 55(1), 53 - 68.[WoS][Crossref]
• Kabele, Jiři and Martin Hajek. 2008. Jak vládli ? Průvodce hierarchiemi reálného socialismu [How they governed ? Th e guide through hierarchies of ‘really existing socialism’]. Brno: Doplněk.
• Kohoutek, Jan, Martin Nekola and Vilem Novotny. 2013. “Conceptualizing Policy Work as Activity and Field of Research.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(1), 28 - 59.
• Koppenjan, Johannes Franciscus Maria and Erik-Hans Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
• Lee, Geon, Jennifer Benoit-Bryan and Timothy P. Johnson. 2012. “Survey Research in Public Administration: Assessing Mainstream Journals with a Total Survey Error Framework.” Public Administration Review 72(1), 87 - 97.[WoS][Crossref]
• Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009. Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years aft er EU Accession, Sigma Papers. Paris: OECD.
• Page, Edward and Bill Jenkins. 2005. Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Th ousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Radin, Beryl A. 2013. “Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(1), 8 - 27.
• Randma-Liiv, Tiina. 2008. “New Public Management versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2), 49 - 71.
• Rasmussen, Ken, Jim Marshall, Adam Wellstead and Bryan Evans. (Unpublished). “Policy Work in Subnational Jurisdictions: Does Size Determine Role ?”.
• Rhodes, Roderick Arthur William. 1996. “Th e New Governance: Governing without Government.” Political Studies 44(4), 652 - 667.[Crossref]
• Scherpereel, John A. 2004. “Renewing the Socialist Past or Moving toward the European Administrative Space ? Inside Czech and Slovak Ministries.” Administration & Society 36(5), 553 - 593. ’t Hart, Paul, Karin Geuijen, Sebastiaan Princen, Kutsal Yesilkagit, and Ellen Mastenbroek. 2007. Th e Europeanization of the Civil Service Craft . Report presented to the Dutch Ministry of the Interior (BZK).
• Vesely, Arnošt. 2013a. “Conducting Large-N Surveys on Policy Work in Bureaucracies: Some Methodological Challenges and Implications from the Czech Republic.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(2), 88 - 113.
• Vesely, Arnošt. 2013b. “Externalization of Policy Advice: Th eory, Methodology and Evidence.” Policy and Society 32(3), 199 - 209.[WoS]
• Vesely, Arnošt. 2012. “Policy Advisory System in the Czech Republic: From State Monopoly to Hollowing out ?” Paper presented at 22nd World Congress of Political Science. 8 - 12 July 2012, Madrid.
• Vesely, Arnošt, Adam Wellstead and Bryan Evans. 2014 (in press). “Comparing Sub-National Policy Workers in Canada and the Czech Republic: Who Are they, what they Do, and why it Matters ?” Policy and Society 2.[WoS]
• Wellstead, Adam, Stedman, Richard C., & Lindquist, Evert (2009). Th e Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada’s Public Service. Canadian Political Science Review, 3(1), 34 - 56.
• Wellstead, Adam, Stedman, Richard. 2010.. Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada’s Federal Government. Public Management Review, 12(6), 893 - 910. [WoS][Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/nispa-2014-0002