From Overdecentralization to Overcentralization ? Hungarian Experience in Handling the Crisis at the Local Level

• Authors: Márton Gellén
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper provides a polemic interpretation of recent Hungarian public-administration reforms compared to the opinions that can be found in international scientific literature. The divergence of the various interpretations stems from the different perspectives on the historic context of the development path of the Hungarian municipal administration during the pre- and post-regime change period. The differences in the interpretation of the achievements of the regime change determine whether one would suggest a minor correction or a total replacement - if given the possibility. After briefly describing the public-administration legacy of the communist past and of the post-communist decades, the article delves into the analysis of the financial unsustainability of the highly decentralized local-government system. The analysis builds on the findings of international financiers that operate as policy- transfer powerhouses, as well. Bursting financial tensions led to Hungary’s loan agreement with the IMF in 1996. Although the loan was paid back by 1998, internal systemic inefficiencies stemming from the uneasy compromises of the regime change still had their corroding effect, although vulnerable finances were veiled by occasional conjunctures in the domestic and international economy. In the year 2008, the country became virtually insolvent and again applied for an IMF loan. The IMF itself formulated certain measures to increase the efficiency of the overdecentralized local-government system. Unlike its predecessor, the government that stepped into power in 2010 had the political power to launch systemic corrections in the local-government system. The reforms contained a trade-off : the majority of local competences in exchange for fiscally consolidating local governments. This is labeled as a trade-off between efficiency and democracy by certain authors. It is a fact that the overdecentralized form of local public administration was inefficient and unsustainable. Now there is an opportunity to test whether an overcentralized public administration would be efficient.

Keywords

EN

democratization; politicization; centralization; decentralization; regime change

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 51-69

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2015-03-04

Contributors

author

Márton Gellén

References

• Ágh, Attila. 2013. “Bumpy Road of the Hungarian Administrative Reforms: From Political Over-Centralization to Public Policy Failures.” Politika i Uprava 13(4), 1149 - 1170.
• Ayres, Ian and John Braithwaite. 1992, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, UK.
• Batory, Agnes. 2012. “Why Do Anti-Corruption Laws Fail in Central Eastern Europe ? A Target Compliance Perspective.” Regulation & Governance 6, 66 - 82.
• Camillus, John C. and K. Deepak Datta. 1991. “Managing Strategic Issues in a Turbulent Environment.” Long Range Planning 24(2), 67 - 74.
• Deither, Jean-Jacques. 2000. “Th e Eff ectiveness of Decentralization in Hungary and Slovakia.” Washington DC: World Bank. Paper prepared for the IMF Conference on Decentralization: Experience, Issues and Policies, 20 - 21 November.
• Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2005. “Th e Rise and Demise of the New Public Management.” Post-Autistic Economics Review 33, 14 September. Available at http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm (last accessed 25 August 2014).
• Ellis, Mark S. 1997. “Purging the Past: Th e Current State of Lustration Laws in the Former Communist Bloc.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59(4), 181 - 196.
• Gál, Erzsébet. 2011. “Kell-e szabályozni az önkormányzati hitelfelvételt ? A magyar eset tanulságai” [Shall local government debts be regulated ? Conclusions of the Hungarian case] Pénzügyi Szemle 56(1), 124 - 144.
• Gellén, Márton. 2014. “Public Administration in a Continental European Legalistic Setting: Th e Hungarian Case.” Teaching Public Administration 32(2), 111 - 126.
• Gellén, Márton. 2012. Közigazgatási reformok az államszerep változásainak tükrében. PhD thesis. Available at http://doktiskjog.sze.hu/images/doktori.hu-ra/gellen%20marton%20vedes/PhD_dolgozat_GellenMarton_vegleges.pdf (last accessed 10 September 2014).
• Gellén, Márton and András Patyi. 2011. “Effi ciency and Judicial Procedures: Friends or Foes ? Analyzing the Relationship of Effi ciency and Judicial Procedures in Th eory and in Practice.” Th e NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy (Special Issue: Education and Training: Preparing for the Future of the Public Sector in Europe) 4(2), 27 - 86.
• Hajnal, György. 2008. “Public Management Reforms: Hungary.” In Geert Bouckaert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrošis, György Hajnal and Kristiina Tonnisson (eds). Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 121 - 150.
• Hajnal, György. 2003. “Diversity and Convergence: A Quantitative Analysis of European Public Administration Education Programs.” Journal of Public Aff airs Education 9(4), 245 - 258.
• Hajnal, György, 2012. Hungary. In: Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. (eds). Verhoest, K., Van Th iel, S., Bouckaert, G., and Laegreid, P. England; Palgrave; Macmillan. 289.
• Hajnal, György and Sándor Csengődi. 2014. “When Crisis Hits Superman: Change and Stability of Political Control and Politicization in Hungary.” Administrative Culture 15(1), 39 - 57.
• Hințea, C, D. Ringsmuth and C. Mora. 2006. “Th e Reform of the Higher Education Public Administration Programs in the Context of Public Administration Reform in Romania.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 16(E), 40 - 46.
• Horváth, Tamás M., Gábor Péteri and Pál Vécsei. 2014. “A helyi forrásszabályozási rendszer magyarországi példája 1990 - 2012” [Hungarian example of regulating local revenues 1990 - 2012]. Közgazdasági Szemle 61 (February), 121 - 147.
• IMF. 2009. First Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement and Request for Modifi cation of Performance Criteria. IMF Country Report No. 09 / 105.
• Jenei, Gyorgy 2011. “Th e Opening of the Hungarian Border for the East German Refugees in 1989: A Public-Policy Analysis of a Key Decision.” Halduskultuur 12(2), 113 - 125.
• Jenei, György 2009. “A közintézményi menedzsment reformjainak torz magyar folyamatai az EU tagállamok mércéjén: hiányok, okok, megoldási javaslatok” [Distorted Hungarian processes of public management reforms measured by the examples of the EU members: gaps, reasons, propositions]. Új Magyar Közigazgatás 6 - 7, 4 - 11.
• Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski and Gábor Tóka. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation and Inter- Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK.
• Kornai, János. 1996. “Paying the Bill for Goulash Communism: Hungarian Development and Macro Stabilization in a Political-Economy Perspective.” Social Research 63(4), 943 - 1040.
• Meyer-Sahling, Jan H. 2006. “Th e Institutionalization of Political Discretion in Post-Communist Civil Service Systems: Th e Case of Hungary.” Public Administration 84(3), 693 - 716.
• Milanovic, Branko. 1997. Income, Inequality and Poverty during the Transition from Planned to Market Economy. Washington D.C.: Th e International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / Th e World Bank, USA. Munkaügyi Levelek [Labour Letters]. 1998. Available at http://munkaugyilevelek.hu/1998/08/megszuntek-a-tb-onkormanyzatok/ (last accessed 11 September 2014.
• Niklasson, Th omas. 2006. Regime Stability and Foreign Policy Change. Interaction between Domestic and Foreign Policy in Hungary 1956 - 1994. Lund Political Studies 143. Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden. Available at http://www.svet.lu.se/fulltext/niklasson.pdf (last accessed 11 September 2014).
• OECD. 2008. Reforms for Stability and Sustainable Growth: An OECD Perspective on Hungary. Paris: OECD Publications.
• Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2008. “Postcommunist Welfare States.” Journal of Democracy 19(4), 80 - 94.
• Pavlínek, Petr. 2004. “Regional Development Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe.” European Urban & Regional Studies 11(1), 47 - 70.
• Pálné, Kovács I. 1990. Helyi politika [Local politics]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó .
• Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. “Public Management Reform: Reliable Knowledge and International Experience.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 3(3), 121 - 136.
• Román, Zoltán. 2005. “Does Competitiveness of our Economy Improve or Weaken ? Our Productivity and Competitiveness in the Light of Statistics.” Gazdaság és Statisztika 17(1), 51 - 62.
• Sandholtz, Wayne and Rein Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture and Communism.” International Review of Sociology 15(1), 109 - 131.
• Sedelmeyer, Ulrich. 2014. “Anchoring Democracy from Above ? Th e European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania aft er Accession.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52(1), 105 - 121.
• Sobis, Iwona and Michiel S. de Vries. 2009. Th e Story Behind Western Advice to Central Europe During Its Transition Period. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 40 - 41.
• Szabó, Lajos. 2012. Az önkormányzatok feladatrendszere. In: Zoltán Barabás et al. (eds). Közigazgatási szakvizsga: Önkormányzati közigazgatás tankönyv Nemzeti Közigazgatási Intézet [Task System of Local Governments. Coursebook for Civil Service Professional Training]. Budapest: National Institute for Public Administration, 27 - 34. Available at http://uni-nke.hu/downloads/egyetem/vtki/onkoritk.pdf (last accessed 11 September 2014).
• Takács, Tibor. 2013. “Állambiztonsági ügynökhálózat és az 1963-as amnesztia” [State Security Agent Network and the 1963 Amnesty]. Betekintő [Journal of the State Security Historical Archives] 3. Available at http://www.betekinto.hu/2013_3_takacs (last accessed 10 September 2014).
• Ungváry, Krisztián. 2008. Elhallgatott múlt: A pártállam és a belügy: A politikai rendőrség működése Magyarországon, 1956 - 1990 [Silenced Past: Th e Party State and the Ministry of the Interior: Th e Operation of the Political Police in Hungary, 1956 - 1990]. Budapest: Corvina Publisher, 1956 Institute.
• Urinboyev, Rustamjon. 2013. Living Law and Political Stability in Post-Soviet Central Asia. A Case Study of the Ferghana Vally in Uzbekistan. Lund. Lund University, Sweden.
• Vigvári, András. 2010. “Is the Confl ict Container Full ? Problems of Fiscal Sustainability at the Local Government Level in Hungary.” Acta Oeconomica 60(1), 49 - 77.
• Vigvári, András. 2009. “Atipikus önkormányzati eladósodás Magyarországon.” [Atypical Indebtedness of Local governments in Hungary]. Közgazdasági Szemle 61(6), 709 - 730.
• Vigvári, András. 2011. Önkormányzati pénzügyek. Hazai kihívások és nemzetközi példák. Állami Számvevőszék Kutató Intézete. (Local Government Finances. Domestic Challenges and International Examples. Research Institute of the State Audit Offi ce), Budapest

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/nispa-2014-0003