The morphology of tense and aspect in Nama, a Papuan language of southern New Guinea

• Authors: Jeff Siegel
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper describes the complex tense and aspect morphology in Nama, a previously undocumented Papuan language of southern New Guinea. Tense/aspect suffixes followed by agent/actor referencing suffixes occur in combination with one of two sets of patient referencing prefixes. Most of the tense/aspect suffixes mark two possible tenses, and the choice of a prefix from a particular set determines the appropriate interpretation. The distinction between imperfective and perfective aspect is central to the Nama tense/aspect system, and the forms of the perfectivity markers depend on the number category of the grammatical arguments: dual versus non-dual, which encompasses both singular and plural (i.e. more than two). At the same time, the agent/actor suffixes and patient referencing prefixes generally index two different number categories: singular versus non-singular. Each of the two basic aspects has three different tenses, with some other aspectual distinctions occurring only with singular arguments. A combination of imperfective and perfective marking is also used.

Keywords

EN

Papuan languages; New Guinea; imperfective; perfective; dual number; inceptive; immediate; proximate; remote

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Open Linguistics
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1

Dates

received

2014-06-30

accepted

2014-10-31

online

2015-02-27

Contributors

author

Jeff Siegel

• School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England,
  Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

References

• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Crowley, Terry, John Lynch, Jeff Siegel, Julie Piau. 1995. The design of language: An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Auckland: Longman Paul.
• Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55 (1), pp. 59-138. [Crossref]
• Evans, Nicholas. 2012a. Even more diverse than we thought: The multiplicity of Trans-Fly languages. In: Evans, Nicholas, Marian Klamer (eds.), Melanesian languages on the edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st century (Language Documentation and Conservation special publication No. 5). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, pp. 109-149.
• Evans, Nicholas. 2012b. Nen assentives and the problem of dyadic parallelisms. In Andrea C. Schalley (ed.), Practical theories and empirical practice: Facets of a complex interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 159-183.
• Evans, Nicholas. forthcoming a. Valency in Nen. In: Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath, Bernard Comrie, Iren Hartmann (eds.), Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Evans, Nicholas. forthcoming b. Inflection in Nen. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jones, Linda K. 1986. The question of ergativity in Yawa, a Papuan language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6 (1), pp. 37-55. [Crossref]
• Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the world (seventeenth edition). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.
• Li, Charles, Rainer Lang. 1979. The syntactic irrelevance of an ergative case in Enga and other Papuan languages. In: Plank, Frans (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press. pp. 307-324.
• Miller, Jim. 2006. Bulgarian. In: Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (second edition). San Diego: Elsevier, pp. 149-151.
• Price, Mavis. 2000. Alphabet development workshop for sociolinguistic orthography [Nama]. ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
• Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66 (2), pp. 143-160.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/opli-2014-0011