The Relationship between Sustainability– Oriented Innovation Practices and Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Slovenian Organizations

• Authors: Matjaž Maletič , Damjan Maletič , Jens J. Dahlgaard , Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park , Boštjan Gomišček
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Background and Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyse the effects of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organizational performance. Further, this paper also aims to advance understanding of the measurement of corporate sustainability practices with the focus on innovation dimensions. Design/Methodology/Approach - The study uses data obtained from a survey of 116 organizations encompassing both the manufacturing and service industries in Slovenia. Descriptive statistics were used in order to determine the level of sustainability-oriented innovation practices deployment. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to extract the underlying factors and to provide a basis for assessing their reliability and validity. In addition, regression analysis was used to quantify the effect of sustainability practices on the organizational performance. Results - Data analysis result showed that sustainability-oriented innovation practices are significantly associated with organizational performance. Therefore, empirical evidence from this research confirmed the premise that building innovation competencies and integrating innovation activities in organization’s processes lead to performance benefits. This contributes to the debate about the potential for organizations to be sustainable and competitive. Conclusion - The presented research on corporate sustainability provides important theoretical and practical insights on which the deployment of sustainability-oriented innovation practices are conducive to fostering a broader set of performance benefits. As such, managers should increase organizations’ capacity for innovation which can be beneficial in terms of performance implications and achieving sustainability goals

Keywords

EN

corporate sustainability; sustainability-oriented innovation; organizational performance; empirical study

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Organizacija
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 47
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 3-13

Dates

published

2014-02-01

online

2014-03-06

Contributors

author

Matjaž Maletič

• University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kidričeva cesta 55a, SI-4000 Kranj, Slovenia

author

Damjan Maletič

• University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kidričeva cesta 55a, SI-4000 Kranj, Slovenia

author

Jens J. Dahlgaard

• Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Sweden

author

Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park

• Lund University, Department of Service Management, Sweden

author

Boštjan Gomišček

• University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kidričeva cesta 55a, SI-4000 Kranj, Slovenia

References

• Antony, J.P. & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs - Part 1: a conceptual framework. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(2), 3-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683041011047812[Crossref]
• Asif, M., Searcy, C., Garvare, R. & Ahmad, N. (2011). Including sustainability in business excellence models. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(7), 773-786, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.585784[Crossref]
• Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M.Á. & Ricartm, J.E. (2006). Responsible competitiveness at the ‘‘micro’’ level of the firm. Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: a dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 475-490, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700610689586[Crossref]
• Baird, K., Hu, K.J. & Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(7), 789-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443571111144850[Crossref]
• Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J. & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013[Crossref]
• Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Río, P. & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1073-1083, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014[Crossref]
• Chenhall, R.H. & Langfield-Smith, K. (2007). Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266-282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.001[Crossref]
• Côté, R., Booth, A. & Louis, B. (2006). Eco-efficiency and SMEs in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 542-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.004[Crossref]
• Collins, E., Roper, J. & Lawrence, S. (2010). Sustainability Practices: Trends in New Zealand Businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 479-494, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.653[Crossref]
• Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. & Dahlgaard, J.J. (2010). Organizational learnability and Innovability: A system for assessing, diagnosing and Improving Innovations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(2), 153-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17566691011057339[Crossref]
• Delai, I. & Takahashi, S. (2013). Corporate sustainability in emerging markets: insights from the practices reported by the Brazilian retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 211-221, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.029[Crossref]
• Dyllik, T. & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. 11(2), 30-141, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.323[Crossref]
• Fairfield, K.D., Harmon, J. & Behson, S.J. (2011). Influences on the organizational implementation of sustainability: an integrative model. Organization Management Journal, 8, 4-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/omj.2011.3[Crossref]
• Fauzi, H, Svensson, G. & Rahman, A.A. (2010). “Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future. Sustainability, 2, 1345-1360, http://dx.doi. org/10.3390/su2051345[Crossref]
• Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (Introducing Statistical Methods series). London: Sage Publications Ltd; Second Edition.
• Fuentes-Fuentes, M.M., Albacete-Sáez, C.A. & Lloréns-Montes, F.J. (2004). The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance. Omega, 32, 425-442, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.02.005[Crossref]
• Gomes, C.F., Yasin, M.M. & Lisboa, J.V. (2011). Performance measurement practices in manufacturing firms revisited International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(1), 5-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443571111098726[Crossref]
• Hahn, T. & Scheermesser, M. (2006). Approaches to Corporate Sustainability among German Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13, 150-165, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.100[Crossref]
• Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010).
• Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Hallstedt, S.I., Thompson, A.W. & Lindahl, P. (2013). Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 277-288, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.043[Crossref]
• Hart, S.L. & Milstein, M.B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-69, http:// www.jstor.org/stable/4165956
• Hockerts, K., Morsing, M., Eder-Hansen, J., Krull, P., Midttun, A., Halme, M., Sweet, S., Davidsson, P., Sigurjonsson, T. O., & Nurmi, P. (2008). CSR-Driven Innovation: Towards the Social Purpose Business. Frederiksberg: Center for Corporate Social Responsibility, CBS. Retrieved from: http://samfundsansvar.dk/file/318859/csr_driven_innovation_towards_social_purpose_business_september_2008..pdf
• Hutchins, J. & Sutherland, J.W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1688-1698, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001 [Crossref]
• Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School.
• Kaplan, R.S. (1983). Measuring manufacturing performance: a new challenge for managerial accounting research. Accounting Review, 58(4), 686-703, http://www.jstor.org/stable/247063
• Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 405-435, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00004-4[Crossref]
• Klewitz, J. & Hansen, E.G. (2013). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017[Crossref]
• Koo, C., Chung, N. & Ryoo, S.Y. (2013). How does ecological responsibility affect manufacturing firms’ environmental and economic performance? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.835615[Crossref]
• Lingteringen, E. & Zadek, S. (2005). The Future of Corporate Responsibility Codes, Standards and Frameworks. Executive Briefing. GRI and AccountAbility, 4.
• Lin, C.Y. & Kuo, T.H. (2007). The mediate effect of learning and knowledge on organizational performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(7), 1066-1083, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570710816748[Crossref]
• Lozano, R. (2011). Creativity and Organizational Learning as Means to Foster Sustainability. Sustainable Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.540[Crossref]
• Maletic, M., Maletic, D. & Gomiscek, B. (2011). Can sustainable quality management contribute to the organizational performance? African Journal of Business Management, 5(9), 3723-3734, http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.1575[Crossref]
• Martensen, A., Dahlgaard, J.J., Park-Dahlgaard, S.M. & Grønholdt, L. (2007). Measuring and diagnosing innovation excellence - simple contra advanced approaches: a Danish study. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(4), 51-65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683040710837928[Crossref]
• Maas, S. & Reniers, G. (2013). Development of a CSR model for practice: Connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business. Journal of Cleaner Production, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.039[Crossref]
• Neely, A. & Adams, C. (2000). Perspectives on performance: the performance prism. In Bourne, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Performance Measurement, Gee Publishing, London.
• Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10 (4), 363-382, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115[Crossref]
• Poksinska, B., Dahlgaard, J.J. & Eklund, J.A.E. (2003). Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(5), 585-606, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710310476543[Crossref]
• Prajogo, D.I. & Sohal, A.S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901-918, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710310493625[Crossref]
• Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26, 76-85, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006[Crossref]
• Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K. & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57, 45-59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.013[Crossref]
• Rocha, M., Searcy, C. & Karapetrovic, S. (2007). Integrating Sustainable Development into Existing Management Systems. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(1-2), 83-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080=14783360601051594
• Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007[Crossref]
• Schaltegger, S. & Wagner, M. (2006). Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability: Capturing the relationship between sustainability performance, business competitiveness and economic performance. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner, (eds) Managing the business case for sustainability: The integration of social, environmental and economic performance, pp. 1-27. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
• Schrettle, S., Hinz, A., Scherrer -Rathje, M. & Friedli, T. (2013). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 73-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.030[Crossref]
• Seuring, S. & Gold, S. (2013). Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 1-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.033[Crossref]
• Siebenhuner, B. & Anold, M. (2007). Organizational learning to manage sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 339-353, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.579 [Crossref]
• Takala, T. & Pallab, P. (2000). Individual, Collective and Social Responsibility of the Firm. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2), 109-118, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.0018[Crossref]
• Tangen, S. (2003). An overview of frequently used performance measures. Work Study. 52(7): 347-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00438020310502651 [Crossref]
• van Kleef, J.A.G. & Roome, N.J. (2007). Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation: a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 38-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.06.002[Crossref]
• Veleva, V. & Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519-549, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00010-5[Crossref]
• Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-14, http://www.jstor.org/stable/258398
• Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26, 247- 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.006[Crossref]
• Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69, 1553-1560, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017[Crossref]
• Wagner, M. (2008). Links between sustainability-related innovation and sustainability management. SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2008-046. Berlin: Technische Universität München. Retrieved, April 13 from http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/papers/pdf/SFB649DP2008-046.pdf
• Witell, L., Löfgren, M. & Gustafsson, A. (2011). Identifying ideas of attractive quality in the innovation process. The TQM Journal, 23(1), 87-99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542731111097515 [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/orga-2014-0001