Work-life Balance by Area, Actual Situation and Expectations – the Overlapping Opinions of Employers and Employees in Slovenia

• Authors: Tatjana Kozjek , Nina Tomaževič , Janez Stare
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Background: The question of work-life balance (WLB) is an area where increasing attention is being paid nowadays. States, organisations and employees all have responsibility and a role to play in WLB. This article presents the important areas of the WLB by key players in this field. Purpose: The purpose of the research was to compare and analyse the differences between the actual situation and the expectations of employers and employees with regard to specific areas of WLB in Slovenia. Methodology: Data was gathered using the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method. In the first part of the research project, employers across all sectors of the economy in Slovenia were questioned and in second part focussed on employees. In order to verify the areas in which employers and employees agree and those in which there are differences in perception, multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used. Results: The results of our research show that Slovenian organisations must pay more attention to flexible working time, the employees’ ability to take time off to care for family members, time and stress management workshops and paid leave for parents on a child’s first day of school. Conclusion: A significant role in WLB is played by organisations. The incorporation of WLB strategies into the strategic and financial planning of an organisation can, in fact, have positive business, economic and social effects. Employees have to express their expectations and needs, which is the only way that employers can be made aware of their problems and help with WLB. State responsibility is to encourage all social partners to shape the living environment in which employees’ can achieve a good WLB with an emphasis on gender equality

Keywords

EN

work-life balance; the state; employer; employee; multidimensional scaling (MDS)

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Organizacija
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 47
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 35-51

Dates

published

2014-02-01

online

2014-03-06

Contributors

author

Tatjana Kozjek

• University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Gosarjeva Street 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

author

Nina Tomaževič

• University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Gosarjeva Street 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

author

Janez Stare

• University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Gosarjeva Street 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

References

• Albanese, P. & Farr, T. (2012). I’m lucky’....; to have child care: evoking luck while managing child care needs in a changing economy. International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies, 3(1), 83-111. Retrieved January 09, 2014 from http:// journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ijcyfs/article/view/10475/3108
• Albertsen, K., Kauppinen, K., Grimsmo, A., Sørensen, B. A., Rafnsdóttir, G. L. & Tómasson, K. (2007). Working time arrangements and social consequences - What do we know? København: Nordic Council of Ministers.
• Arbon, C.A., Facer, R.L. & Wadsworth, L.L. (2012). Compressed Workweeks - Strategies for Successful Implementation. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 389-405, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009102601204100301[WoS][Crossref]
• Begall, K. & Mills, M. (2011). The Impact of Subjective Work Control, Job Strain and Work-Family Conflict on Fertility Intentions: a European Comparison. Eur J Population, 27, 433-456, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-011-9244-z[WoS][Crossref]
• Bonet, R., Cruz, C., Fernandez Kranz, D. & Justo, R. (2013). Temporary contracts and work-family balance in a dual labour market. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 66(1), 55-87. Retrieved January 09, 2014 from http://digitalcommons. ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/vol66/iss1/3
• Buehler, C. & O’Brien, M. (2011). Mothers’ Part-Time Employment: Associations With Mother and Family Well- Being. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(6), 895-906, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025993[WoS][Crossref]
• COFACE (Confederation of Family Organizations in the European Union). (2008). COFACE Position on reconciling family life, private life and professional life to prevent poverty and social exclusion. Adopted by the Administrative Council of COFACE on 15-16 December 2008. Retrieved May 17, 2010, http://coface-eu.org/en/upload/WG%20SOCIAL/WG1-2008-PositionCOFACE-reconciliation-EN.pdf
• Davis, A. & Kalleberg, A. (2006). Family friendly organizations: Work and family programs in the 1990. Work and Occupations, 33(2), 191-223, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888405280446[Crossref]
• Den Dulk, L. & Doorne-Huiskes, A. (2010). Social Policy in Europe: its Impact on Families and Work. In: Crompton, R., Lewis, S. & Lyonette, C. (ed). Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35-57.
• Den Dulk, L., Groeneveld, S. & Bram, P. (2014). Workplace worklife balance support from a capabilities perspective. In: Hobson (ed). Worklife balance. The Agency & Capabilities Gap. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 153-173.
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and work conditions. (2007). Combining family and full-time work. Retrieved April 08, 2010 from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/reports/TN0510TR02/TN0510TR02.pdf
• European Economic and Social Committee (2007). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on The role of the social partners in reconciling working, family and private life. Exploratory opinion. SOC/271 - CES 998/2007, 11 July 2007, Brussels. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.soc-opinions.14131
• Fagan, C. & Walthery, P. (2014). Working time capabilities at workplace: individual adjustment options between full-time and part-time working in European firms. In: Hobson B. (ed). Worklife balance. The Agency & Capabilities Gap. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 174-205.
• Fahlen, S. (2014). The agency gap: policies, norms, and working time capabilities across welfare states. In: Hobson B. (ed). Worklife balance. The Agency & Capabilities Gap. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-56.
• Fagnani, J. (2010). Fertility Rates and Mother’s Employment Behaviour in Comparative Perspective: Similarities and Differences in Six European Countries. In: Crompton, R., Lewis, S. & Lyonette, C. (ed). Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59-75.
• Fernández Cordón, J. A. (2009), Policy issues for reconciling work and the family. The United Nations Expert Group Meeting on ‘Family policy in a changing world: Promoting social protection intergenerational solidarity’. Doha, Quatar, 14-16 April 2009. Retrieved May 05, 2010, from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/docs/egm09/Cordon.pdf
• Fox, E., Pascall, G. & Warren, T. (2009). Work-family policies, participation, and practices: fathers and childcare in Europe. Community. Work & Family, 12(3), 313-326, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800902966323[Crossref]
• Galea, C. Houkes, I. & De Rijk, A. (2013). An insider’s point of view: how a system of flexible working hours helps employees to strike a proper balance between work and personal life. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1090-1111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013 .816862[Crossref][WoS]
• Hashiguchi, M. (2010). Flexible working arrangements and specific training in the UK voluntary sector: A case study. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(4), 431-447, http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0143831X10365575[Crossref][WoS]
• Halpern, D. F. (2005). How time-flexible work policies can reduce stress, improve health and save money. Stress and Health, 21, 157-168, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.1049[Crossref]
• Hinkin, T.R. & Tracey, J.B. (2010). What Makes It So Great? An Analyses of Human Resources Practices among Fortune’s Best Companies to Work For. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(2), 158-170, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1938965510362487[WoS][Crossref]
• Hobson, B. (2014). Introduction: capabilities and agency for worklife balance - a multidimensional framework. In: Hobson B. (ed). Worklife balance. The Agency & Capabilities Gap. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-31.
• Hong, S. A. (2009). Work-Family Balance Policies: From a Comparative Perspective. GSPR2009, vol. 2. Retrieved April 02, 2010, from http://www.GSPR2009_2_05_Seung_Ah_ Hong[1].pdf.
• ILO (2004). The family friendly workplace. Geneva. Retrieved April, 07, 2010 from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/condtrav/pdf/infosheets/wf-3.pdf
• ILO. (2004a). Making work arrangements more family-friendly. Geneva: International Labour Office. Joyce, K., Pabayo, R., Critchley, J. A. & Bambra, C. (2010). Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 1-89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2[Crossref]
• Kanjuo Mrčela, A. & Černigoj Sadar, N. (2014). Capabilities for work life balance in the context of increasing work intensity and precariousness in the service sector and the IT industry in a transitional economy. In: Hobson B. (ed). Worklife balance. The Agency & Capabilities Gap. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 238-265.
• Kelly, E., Kossek, E., Hammer, L., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., Murphy, L. & Kaskubar, D. (2008). Getting There From Here: Research on the Effects of Work-Family Initiatives on Work-Family Conflict and Business Outcomes. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 305-349, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211610[Crossref]
• Kelly, E.L., Phyllis, M. & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing Workplaces to Reduce Work-Family Conflict: Schedule Control in a White-Collar Organization. American Sociological Review, 76, 265-90, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400056[Crossref][WoS]
• Kossek, E.E. & Michel, J.S. (2010). Flexible work schedules. In: Zedeck, S. (ed.). APA Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Littig, B. (2008). Work Life Balance - catchword or catalyst for sustainable work? Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/soc/rs85.pdf
• OECD. (2007). OECD Policy Brief. Can Policies Boost Birth Rates? Observer OECD, Paris, November. Retrieved May 08, 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/57/39970765.pdf
• OECD. (2008). Policy Brief. Babies and Bosses: Balancing Work and Family Life. OECD Observer, July. Retrieved April 26, 2010 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/2/34566853.pdf Thévenon, O. (2008). Family policies in Europe: available databases and initial comparisons. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 165-177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2008s165[Crossref]
• Vandell, D. L. & Shumow, L. (1999). After-School Child Care Programs. The Future of Children When School is Out, 9(2), 64-80, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602707[Crossref]
• Van Dyne, L., Kossek, E. & Lobel, S. (2007). Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support worklife flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations, 60(8), 1123-1154, http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0018726707081657[Crossref]
• Warren, T., Fox, E. & Pascall, G. (2009). Innovative Social Policies: Implications for Work-life Balance among Low-waged Women in England. Gender, Work and Organization. 16(1), 126-150, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00433.x [Crossref]
• Wharton, A.S. (2012). Work and Family in the 21st Century: Four Research Domains. Sociology Compass, 6(3), 219-235, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00450.x [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/orga-2014-0004