Social Sciences and Common Perceptions of Sport

• Authors: Jerzy Kosiewicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper provides a discussion on various aspects and features of the concept of the social sciences of sport. The concept originated recently and was formulated in 2007 during the preparations for the establishment of the International Society for the Social Sciences of Sport. The Society, however, was not formed until the beginning of 2009. Among other things, the concept includes such academic disciplines and fields as sport sociology, sport philosophy, sport psychology, sport pedagogy, the history of physical fitness, sport and Olympism, sport politics and the international conditions of sport, sport economics, sport organizations and management, the social and cultural foundations of tourism and recreation, the social relations regarding training and sport tactics, as well as the humanistic theory of martial arts. The author presents a growth in interest of different social aspects and issues of sport at the beginning of the twentieth century. He indicates the significant development of sport during the second half of the last century, especially towards its end and at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The social sciences of sport was also underlined as the reason for the creation of a new, dynamically developing cognitive paradigm. According to the Author, it is mainly connected with the institutional and functional, organizational and methodological conditions of the social science of sport which specifically complemented the educational and research standards for the academic community around the globe. The Author emphasizes the social sciences of sport’s distinctive and autonomous part in sport science due to its specific and detailed merit-related issues and methodological foundations. He also stresses that not only does natural science (particularly biological science) play an important role in sport science, but also that the social science of sport has a vital and fundamental value in it. In his opinion, natural (biological) science in relation to sport refers mainly to one person’s organism, whereas social science refers, for the most part, to the axiological, cultural, symbolical, esthetic, ethical perception of physical exertion. Moreover, research conducted in this field encompasses the professional, pragmatic, utilitarian, cathartic, escapist, ludic, hedonistic, epistemological and recreational aspects of differently perceived professional sports or sport for all. The Author points out that the amount of available courses - lectures, classes, seminars - in the field of social sciences themselves, as well as in the social science of sport, is being gradually reduced, which undoubtedly lowers not only the knowledge, but also the perception, interpretation, explanation and comprehension of sport in the context of the humanistic approach. Furthermore, he indicates this trend’s influential role in the development of common-sense thinking, which makes opinion-forming and valuable comments on the subject of sport undergo cognitive deformations. He points out its negative influence on the listeners, audience and fans’ consciousness, opinion and attitude, as well as on the interpretative context of the observed events - not only ones associated with sport, but also those happening beyond it, for instance in social, family, peer, professional, political and religious life.

Keywords

EN

social sciences of sport; common-sense thinking; research methodology; hypothesis; research procedure

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 60
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 64-74

Dates

published

2013-12-01

online

2013-12-10

Contributors

author

Jerzy Kosiewicz

• Josef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland

References

• Cameron, I. (1979). Scientific Images and Their Social Uses. An Introduction to the Concept of Science. London: Butterworth.
• Carnap, R. (1935). Logical Syntax of Language. In R. Carnap, Philosophy and Logical Syntax. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
• Carnap, R. (1969). Sprawdzalność i znaczenie/Reliability and importance/. In R. Carnap, Filozofia jako analiza językanauki /Philosophy as an analysis of the language of science/. Warszawa: PWN.
• Carnap, R. (1973). Neopozytywistyczna koncepcja weryfikacji w ujęcia Carnapa /Carnap’s neo-positivist conception of verification/. In B. Mejbaum, W. Mejbaum. (Eds.), Główne zagadnienia filozofii i socjologii marksistowskiej /Keyissues of Marxist philosophy and sociology/. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Akademia Medyczna w Łodzi.
• Czerwiński, M. (1986). Przedmowa./Introduction/. In T. Hołówka, Myślenie potoczne /Common-sense thinking/. Warsaw: PIW.
• Feyerabend P. (1970). Against the Method. Minnesota Studies for the Philosophy of Science, 4.
• Hołówka, T. (1986). Myślenie potoczne /Common-sense thinking/. Warsaw: PIW.[WoS]
• Kołakowski, L. (2000). Zakresowe i funkcjonalne rozumienie filozofii /The scope and functional understanding of philosophy/. In Kultura i fetysze /Culture and fetishes/. Warszawa: PWN.
• Kosiewicz, J. (2008/2009). Philosophy of Sport from the Institutional, Content Related and Methodological Viewpoint, Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 46, 5-31. DOI: 10.2478/v10141-009-0001-5.[Crossref]
• Kosiewicz, J. (2010). Social and Biological Context of Physical Culture and Sport. Physical Culture and Sport. Studiesand Research, 50, 5-31. DOI: 10.2478/v10141-010-0021-1.[Crossref]
• Kosiewicz, J. (2012). Considerations on General Methodological Assumptions the Sciences of Sport, Physical Cultureand Sport. Studies and Research, 56, 65-101, DOI: 10.2478/v10141-012-0026-z.[Crossref]
• Kuhn, T. (1968). Struktura rewolucji naukowych /Structure of scientific revolutions/. Warszawa: PWN.
• Lakatos, I. (1995). Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych /Writings from the philosophy of the empirical sciences/. Warszawa: PWN.
• MacFadden, B. (1926). MacFadden's Encyclopedia of Physical Culture (Bernarr MacFadden assisted by Specialists in the Application of Natural Methods of Healing), New York: MacFadden's Publications, INC., Chicago: Hammond Press WB Conkey Company Chicago.
• Nelson, L. (1994). O sztuce filozofowania /On the art of philosophizing/. Kraków: Baran i Szuszczyński.
• Nietzsche, F. (1907). Narodziny tragedyi, czyli hellenizm i pesymizm /The birth of tragedy/. Kraków: Nakład Jakóba Mortkowicza.
• Piątkowska, M. (2006). Rozumienie pojęcia kultura na świecie /Understanding the concept of culture around the world/. Kultura Fizyczna, 9-12, 83-86.
• Popper, K. (1995). Logika odkryca naukowego /The logic of scientific discovery/. Warszawa: PWN.
• Reinchenbach, H. (1936). Logistic Empiricism in Germany at the Present State of Its Problems. Journal of Philosophy, 33.
• Schelling, F.W.J. (2002). Filozofia objawienia. Ujęcie pierwotne /Philosophy of epiphany: Primal conceptualization/. Vol. 1. Warszawa: PWN.
• http://www.bernarrmacfadden.com/

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/pcssr-2013-0027