PL EN


2013 | 17 | 2 | 101-113
Article title

Doubtfulness – A Dialogical Perspective

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The current globalizing world stimulates many doubts. Doubtfulness is a starting point for inner dialogue. Internal dialogical activity often reduces the experience of uncertainty by integration of contrasting ideas. Sometimes, however, the result is quite opposite - doubts grow rather than being reduced. The paper proposes a dialogical model of doubtfulness and presents empirical findings which are consistent with the model. Additionally, the functions of doubtfulness and internal dialogue in philosophy and science are discussed. On one hand, as empirical results show, doubtfulness can be linked to anxiety which blocks human thinking and acting. On the other hand, as exemplified by Galileo, doubt demands a deeper analysis of the situation and is conducive to human development, in personal or even in socio-cultural space.
Publisher
Year
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
101-113
Physical description
Dates
published
2013-09-01
online
2013-09-06
Contributors
  • John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
author
  • Faculty of Psychology, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland, poles@swps.edu.pl
References
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and selfreactive mechanisms. In R. Dienstbler (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 69-164). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Bibler, V. (1982). Myślenie jako dialog [Thinking as Dialogue]. Warszawa: PIW.
  • Campbell, J.D., Trapnell, P.D., Heine, S.J., Katz, I.M., Lavallee, L.F., & Lehman, D.R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156.
  • Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R)and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G., & Brennan, K.A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.
  • Galileo, G. (1967). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems - Ptolemaicand Copernican (2 ed.). California: University of California Press.
  • Gergen, K.J. (1992). The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Modern Life. New York: Basic.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late ModernAge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hermans, H.J.M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 31-50.[Crossref]
  • Hermans, H.J.M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Introduction. Theory & Psychology, 12, 147-160.
  • Hermans, H.J.M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 89-130.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Hermans, H.J.M. & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 31-61.
  • Hermans, H.J.M. & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical Self Theory: Positioningand Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hermans, H.J.M. & Kempen, H.J.G. (1993). The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Josephs, I.E. (1998). Constructing one’s self in the city of the silent: Dialogue, symbols, and the role of ‘as-if’ in self-development. Human Development, 41, 180-195.[Crossref]
  • Kołakowski, L. (1984). Czy diabeł może być zbawiony i 27 innych kazań [Can theDevil Be Saved and 27 Other Sermons]. London: Aneks.
  • Kołakowski, L. (1990). Cywilizacja na ławie oskarżonych [Civilization in the Dock]. Warszawa: Res Publica.
  • Kuchinski, G.M. (1983). Dialog i myshlenie. Minsk: BGU.
  • Leary, M.R. (2004). The Curse of the Self. Self-Awareness, Egotism, and the Qualityof Human Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Marková, I. (2005). Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McAdams, D.P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7 (4), 295-321.[Crossref]
  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T.J. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Oleś, P. (2009). Czy głosy umysłu da się mierzyć? Skala Wewenętrznej Aktywności Dialogowej (SWAD) [Can the mind’s voices be measured? The Internal Dialogical Activity Scale (IDAS)]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 52, 37-50.
  • Oleś, P. (2011). Dialogowe Ja: zarys teorii, inspiracje badawcze, ciekawsze wyniki [The dialogical self: Theory, research inspirations, interesting results]. In P.
  • Oleś & M. Puchalska-Wasyl (Eds.), Dialog z samym sobą [A Dialogue withOneself] (pp. 143-171). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Oleś, P. & Batory, A. (2008). Wstęp [Introduction]. In P. Oleś & A. Batory (Eds.), Tożsamość i jej przemiany a kultura [Identity and Its Changes vs. Culture]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  • Oleś, P., Batory, A., Buszek, M., Chorąży, K., Dras, J., Jankowski, T., Kalinowska, I., Kubala, D., Parzych, J., Sadowski, S., Sosnowska, K., Talik, W., & Wróbel, M. (2010). Wewnętrzna aktywność dialogowa i jej psychologiczne korelaty [Internal dialogical activity and its psychological correlates]. CzasopismoPsychologiczne, 16 (1), 113-127.
  • Oleś, P. & Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2012). Dialogicality and personality traits. In H.J.M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory (pp. 241-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2006). Nasze wewnętrzne dialogi. O dialogowości jako sposobiefunkcjonowania człowieka [Our Inner Dialogues. About Dialogicalityas a Way of Human Functioning]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  • Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2010). Dialogue, monologue and change of perspective - three forms of dialogicality. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4 (1), 67-79.
  • Puchalska-Wasyl, M., Chmielnicka-Kuter, E., & Oleś, P. (2008). From internal interlocutors to psychological functions of dialogical activity. Journal ofConstructivist Psychology, 21 (3), 239-269.[WoS]
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Saugstad, P. (1977). A Theory of Communication and Use of Language. Foundationsfor the Study of Psychology. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Saugstad, P. (1980). A Theory of Language and Understanding. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., & Oh, S. (2001). The development of intelligence at midlife. In M.E. Lachman (Ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development (pp. 217-247). New York: John Wiley.
  • Tarnas, R. (2000). Dzieje umysłowości zachodniej [History of the Western Mind]. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_plc-2013-0007
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.