Special Issue of Polish Psychological Bulletin on “Agency and communion in social cognition and behavior”

• Authors: Aleksandra Szymkow , Dorota Kalka
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 392-393

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2014-12-16

Contributors

author

Aleksandra Szymkow

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot Campus, ul. Polna 16/20, 81-745 Sopot, Poland;

author

Dorota Kalka

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot Campus, ul. Polna 16/20, 81-745 Sopot, Poland;

References

• Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and femininecommunal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776.
• Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935-948.
• Abele, A. E. & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). The Big Two of Agency and Communion in Language and Communication. In J. Forgas& J. Laszlo (Eds.), Language and social psychology. New York: Psychology press.
• Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063-1065.[WoS]
• Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.[WoS]
• Abele, A. & Wojciszke, B., (2014). Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Accepted for Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.[WoS]
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P. P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.[WoS]
• Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configuration model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276-298
• De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The double meaning of a single act: Influence of the perceiver and the perceived on cooperative behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 13, 165-182.
• Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877-889.
• Forgas J. P., Fiedler, K., & Sedikides, C. (2013). Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behavior: Classical theories and current perspectives.In J. P. Forgas, K. Fiedler, C. Sedikides (Eds.), Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behavior (pp. 1-22), Psychology Press, New York.
• Kenworthy, J., & Tausch, N. (2008). Expectations about the accuracy and stability of warmth versus competence traits: An intergroup analysis.European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1121-1129.[WoS]
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
• Macrae, C., & Miles, L. (2012). Revisiting the sovereignty of social cognition: Finally some action. In S. Fiske, & C. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social cognition. (pp. 1-12). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Radkiewicz, P., Skarzynska, K., & Hamer, K. (2013). The influence of the Big Two. The perception of people in relation to negativistic beliefs about the social world. Social Psychology, 44, 75-83.[WoS]
• Scholer, A. A. & Higgins, E. T. (2008). People as resources: Exploring the functionality of warm and cold. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1111-1120.[WoS]
• Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V. & Palma, T. A. (2012). Interfacing body, mind, the physical, and social world: Socially Situated Cognition. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 637-655). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2009). The social context of cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 454-466). Cambridge University Press.
• Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2006). Socially situated cognition as a bridge. In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 145-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.[WoS]
• Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617-627.[WoS]
• Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R. & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245-1257.
• Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083-1092[WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ppb-2014-0047